Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

News & Politics News & Politics

Romney The Guy Who Lost Says ObamaCare Should Have Been More Like RomneyCare

Posted by on Oct. 31, 2013 at 9:00 AM
  • 4 Replies
by on Oct. 31, 2013 at 9:00 AM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-4):
JanuaryBaby06
by on Oct. 31, 2013 at 10:43 PM

He's just trying to stay in the spot light....can't blame him.

rocketracer
by Gold Member on Oct. 31, 2013 at 10:56 PM
2 moms liked this

Not exactly...during the debate over Obamacare Romney said Obama should have talked to him to talk about things that didn't work, but Obama chose not to...

mustbeGRACE
by Silver Member on Nov. 1, 2013 at 1:51 AM
1 mom liked this

The answer to your question is LIV....low information voters.

SallyMJ
by Ruby Member on Nov. 1, 2013 at 3:12 AM

No, actually - Romney spoke up because Obama made an a$$ out of himself again - O tried to make excuses for the Obamacare debacle, by saying the RomneyCare launch was as effed up as the ObamaCare launch. Romney defended himself and said No - RomneyCare is a state system that is not structured the same as Obamacare. Not only are the two not structured the same, but Obama didn't pay enough attention to learn from what they did better than Obamacare, and what they would have done differently. The MA health care law was BIPARTISAN - That's the biggest difference. And yes, it has cost twice as much as it had been projected. And the law has been revised significantly over the past seven years. A smart executive would have learned from Massachusetts' example.

Obama may have won the presidential election, but he sure lost the Obamacare implementation election in a landslide. Despicable how he and the Obama-ites like to play games with peoples' lives, jobs, finances, and the economy. Losers.

The whole point of the law was to add to the insured 15% of Americans who were uninsured. So they eff up the system, so lots of people lose jobs, or hours, or insurance, and so a different  millions of Americans are uninsured, and many others have to pay much more. That is not a solution. That's called a perverse effect contrary to what was originally intended; an intended solution makes a problem worse.

Why would an elected leader want to force onto the American people a law that a majority does not want? It's because he thinks he is so full of himself he thinks he knows what is better for We the People than we do. That is unprecedented.

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN