Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

News & Politics News & Politics

Eventually Obama is going to have to speak up on black-on-white violence

Posted by on Jan. 24, 2014 at 1:58 PM
  • 34 Replies
1 mom liked this

Obama

August 26, 2013

If I had to guess, my hunch would be that the black blood coursing through the veins of our first half-black, half-white president runs hotter than the Caucasian blood. He finds it much easier to become passionate about race and the problems attendant on it when the victim of a crime — and not the perpetrator — is dark-skinned, as he himself is.

When the complexion of the victim is more like that of his mother, the president becomes tongue-tied. It is hard to know whether this is a matter of choice or necessity, but either way Barack Obama would just as soon “not go there.”

In a way, the president has history on his side just as assuredly as he has the mainstream media in his pocket. The narrative of injustice toward blacks is far more compelling. It evokes distasteful images of Africans crammed into ships bound for the New World to be sold into enslavement. It summons up images of Jim Crow and victims like Emmett Till (to pick one name that gets bandied about a lot these days).

But history is only effective as long as its lessons are still valid, and the argument that we haven’t advanced as a nation in the 50 years since the March on Washington is becoming increasingly difficult to make. Obama may have history to back up his comments on race, but he doesn’t have the facts.

John McWhorter, also a black man, does and presents them in an article in TIME that is receiving a lot of attention. “The numbers don’t lie,” McWhorter argues:

[Y]oung black men do commit about 50% of the murders in the U.S. We don’t yet know whether the attack on [Christopher] Lane, [a white man shot in the back by three teens, two of them black] was racially motivated, nor can we know whether the three black boys who attacked a white boy on a Florida school bus recently would not have done the same to a black kid. (Critics took Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson to task for not condemning the violence.) But hardly uncommon are cases such as [that of] the two black guys who doused a white 13-year-old with gasoline and lit him on fire, saying ‘You get what you deserve, white boy’ (Kansas City, Mo.) or 20 black kids whobeat up white Matthew Owens on his porch ’for Trayvon’ (Mobile, Ala.).

So, it’s just fake to pretend that the association of young black men with violence comes out of thin air.

Which is pretty much the fiction that Obama’s enablers on the left continue to invest in. The crime against Trayvon Martin — his “victimization” if you accept the formulation of liberal writers — is somehow different from these other crimes. It’s because he was young or defenseless or minding his own business. But Chris Lane was young, just 5 years older than Martin at the time he was senselessly gunned down. And Fannie Gumbinger, who was 99 at the time of her slaying by a 20-year-black who broke into her home, was certainly defenseless and minding her own business.

No, what makes the killing of Trayvon Martin different is that the left wants it to be different. They want it to emblematic of something that once existed but has since been widely eradicated. If there are vestiges of racism toward blacks in American society, they are hardly more prevalent than black racism toward whites, which is borne largely out of resentment manufactured by guilty white liberals.

That this reality is dawning increasingly on the left is evident in an article today at CNN.com by contributor Ruben Navarrette, who writes candidly:

Americans are told we need to have a national conversation in which we talk about race.

And yet, when we have horrific crimes with white victims where the alleged perpetrators are African-American or Latino, we're told that we can't talk about race.

This isn't true when the roles are reversed. If the victims are African-American or Latino, and the alleged perpetrator is white, we talk about race until our throats go dry.

Confused? Join the club.

by on Jan. 24, 2014 at 1:58 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
Billiejeens
by Ruby Member on Jan. 24, 2014 at 3:59 PM
4 moms liked this

Why would he have to?

He has the zombies the bots and the media running cover for him.

VooDooB
by Member on Jan. 24, 2014 at 5:35 PM
6 moms liked this

Nice idea, but he won't. He was quick to jump on the Trayvon Martin case before it even went to trial, but remains mum on the knock out crime running rampant in the country. He'll continue to look the other way unless it hits home for him and him only.

Billiejeens
by Ruby Member on Jan. 26, 2014 at 4:09 PM
Quoting VooDooB:

Nice idea, but he won't. He was quick to jump on the Trayvon Martin case before it even went to trial, but remains mum on the knock out crime running rampant in the country. He'll continue to look the other way unless it hits home for him and him only.



Yep
!
MomTiara19
by Silver Member on Jan. 26, 2014 at 8:04 PM
2 moms liked this

The president has a job.It is not to speak out on every white on black and black on white crime.

He spoke on the Trayvon Martin case because it was huge,all over the media,with fears of a racial riot.Any president in office would have had to address the racial tension.It just happened to be that president Obama is half black.He can relate to what it is like to be a young black male and the stereotypes and judgements that can come with it.

Can some white people understand it?No they wont.

Will some white people see him as partial?Yes they will.

They will not be able to empathise in any way as what it feels like to be AA.

We have a law system,a justice system,and police officers to deal with crimes.

The fixation by some on president Obamas mixed raced heritage and what race he is loyal too is very bizarre and obsessive.

vic270
by Vic on Jan. 26, 2014 at 8:36 PM

 they aren't going to stop now either, they love our 50/50  racist president.

Quoting Billiejeens:

Why would he have to?

He has the zombies the bots and the media running cover for him.

 

Radarma
by Member on Jan. 27, 2014 at 12:52 AM
3 moms liked this

Well I certainly wish he would say something. The numbers don't lie.

Thanks for posting this SMJ.

SallyMJ
by Ruby Member on Jan. 27, 2014 at 2:02 AM
2 moms liked this

We're not talking about EVERY black on white crime. We're talking about it in general. Every racial crime needs to be treated as a hate crime - since black on white is about three times as much as white on black crime.

But why did Obama insert himself in the Trayvon Martin case, when it wasn't a white on black crime, it was self defense due to a black on Latino crime. He spoke of it as if TM were innocent and GZ guilty, when it was the other way around. As I mentioned elsewhere, charging a man with murder and a court trial is not an appropriate riot prevention strategy.

And why talk about the black professor, when he was arrested for disorderly conduct for insulting the cop who observed him jimmying a door lock. He didn't say, "Hello, officer, this is my house - I locked myself out." He screamed at the officer and accused him of being a racist.

A white president would be expected to address all racial crime. Why can't a black president do the same?

Quoting MomTiara19:

The president has a job.It is not to speak out on every white on black and black on white crime.

He spoke on the Trayvon Martin case because it was huge,all over the media,with fears of a racial riot.Any president in office would have had to address the racial tension.It just happened to be that president Obama is half black.He can relate to what it is like to be a young black male and the stereotypes and judgements that can come with it.

Can some white people understand it?No they wont.

Will some white people see him as partial?Yes they will.

They will not be able to empathise in any way as what it feels like to be AA.

We have a law system,a justice system,and police officers to deal with crimes.

The fixation by some on president Obamas mixed raced heritage and what race he is loyal too is very bizarre and obsessive.


Debrowsky
by Silver Member on Jan. 27, 2014 at 2:56 PM
2 moms liked this

well said, Sally

Quoting SallyMJ:

We're not talking about EVERY black on white crime. We're talking about it in general. Every racial crime needs to be treated as a hate crime - since black on white is about three times as much as white on black crime.

But why did Obama insert himself in the Trayvon Martin case, when it wasn't a white on black crime, it was self defense due to a black on Latino crime. He spoke of it as if TM were innocent and GZ guilty, when it was the other way around. As I mentioned elsewhere, charging a man with murder and a court trial is not an appropriate riot prevention strategy.

And why talk about the black professor, when he was arrested for disorderly conduct for insulting the cop who observed him jimmying a door lock. He didn't say, "Hello, officer, this is my house - I locked myself out." He screamed at the officer and accused him of being a racist.

A white president would be expected to address all racial crime. Why can't a black president do the same?

Quoting MomTiara19:

The president has a job.It is not to speak out on every white on black and black on white crime.

He spoke on the Trayvon Martin case because it was huge,all over the media,with fears of a racial riot.Any president in office would have had to address the racial tension.It just happened to be that president Obama is half black.He can relate to what it is like to be a young black male and the stereotypes and judgements that can come with it.

Can some white people understand it?No they wont.

Will some white people see him as partial?Yes they will.

They will not be able to empathise in any way as what it feels like to be AA.

We have a law system,a justice system,and police officers to deal with crimes.

The fixation by some on president Obamas mixed raced heritage and what race he is loyal too is very bizarre and obsessive.



Billiejeens
by Ruby Member on Jan. 27, 2014 at 3:00 PM
1 mom liked this

 Absolutely

Quoting Debrowsky:

well said, Sally

Quoting SallyMJ:

We're not talking about EVERY black on white crime. We're talking about it in general. Every racial crime needs to be treated as a hate crime - since black on white is about three times as much as white on black crime.

But why did Obama insert himself in the Trayvon Martin case, when it wasn't a white on black crime, it was self defense due to a black on Latino crime. He spoke of it as if TM were innocent and GZ guilty, when it was the other way around. As I mentioned elsewhere, charging a man with murder and a court trial is not an appropriate riot prevention strategy.

And why talk about the black professor, when he was arrested for disorderly conduct for insulting the cop who observed him jimmying a door lock. He didn't say, "Hello, officer, this is my house - I locked myself out." He screamed at the officer and accused him of being a racist.

A white president would be expected to address all racial crime. Why can't a black president do the same?

Quoting MomTiara19:

The president has a job.It is not to speak out on every white on black and black on white crime.

He spoke on the Trayvon Martin case because it was huge,all over the media,with fears of a racial riot.Any president in office would have had to address the racial tension.It just happened to be that president Obama is half black.He can relate to what it is like to be a young black male and the stereotypes and judgements that can come with it.

Can some white people understand it?No they wont.

Will some white people see him as partial?Yes they will.

They will not be able to empathise in any way as what it feels like to be AA.

We have a law system,a justice system,and police officers to deal with crimes.

The fixation by some on president Obamas mixed raced heritage and what race he is loyal too is very bizarre and obsessive.


 

 

vic270
by Vic on Jan. 28, 2014 at 7:02 AM

 Sally that should be printed in USA today, imo it is Fox News Worthy. but remember who we are talking about, but what a great reply.clapping

Quoting SallyMJ:

We're not talking about EVERY black on white crime. We're talking about it in general. Every racial crime needs to be treated as a hate crime - since black on white is about three times as much as white on black crime.

But why did Obama insert himself in the Trayvon Martin case, when it wasn't a white on black crime, it was self defense due to a black on Latino crime. He spoke of it as if TM were innocent and GZ guilty, when it was the other way around. As I mentioned elsewhere, charging a man with murder and a court trial is not an appropriate riot prevention strategy.

And why talk about the black professor, when he was arrested for disorderly conduct for insulting the cop who observed him jimmying a door lock. He didn't say, "Hello, officer, this is my house - I locked myself out." He screamed at the officer and accused him of being a racist.

A white president would be expected to address all racial crime. Why can't a black president do the same?

Quoting MomTiara19:

The president has a job.It is not to speak out on every white on black and black on white crime.

He spoke on the Trayvon Martin case because it was huge,all over the media,with fears of a racial riot.Any president in office would have had to address the racial tension.It just happened to be that president Obama is half black.He can relate to what it is like to be a young black male and the stereotypes and judgements that can come with it.

Can some white people understand it?No they wont.

Will some white people see him as partial?Yes they will.

They will not be able to empathise in any way as what it feels like to be AA.

We have a law system,a justice system,and police officers to deal with crimes.

The fixation by some on president Obamas mixed raced heritage and what race he is loyal too is very bizarre and obsessive.


 

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN