• In the Spotlight:
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Where is the outrage?

Posted by on Apr. 3, 2014 at 10:51 AM
  • 13 Replies
So no one is talking about the Supreme Court ruling yesterday?
by on Apr. 3, 2014 at 10:51 AM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
timeforprogress
by Bronze Member on Apr. 3, 2014 at 11:10 AM
You mean it wasn't a bad dream, and the Supreme Court really did vote to allow a further corrupting of the electoral process?

Excuse me while I go cry.
jaxTheMomm
by Gold Member on Apr. 3, 2014 at 11:15 AM

No, we are too busy talking about how evil Obama is.  Oh, and our liberal SCOTUS.

Pema_Jampa
by Emerald Member on Apr. 3, 2014 at 11:23 AM

Too many Cafemoms that need to be saved. No time for such nonsense.

Billiejeens
by Emerald Member on Apr. 3, 2014 at 11:25 AM

It was a reasonable and sensible ruling - why would there be outrage?

SallyMJ
by Ruby Member on Apr. 3, 2014 at 11:40 AM

I guess lots of people agree that donations from liberal unions are worth as much as donations fromnon-unions. Duh.

And most people think the First Amendment is pretty darn important.

lylalane7275
by Silver Member on Apr. 3, 2014 at 11:48 AM

It creates a level playing field.  Fair for all.

Schauseil
by Silver Member on Apr. 3, 2014 at 1:11 PM
It does? So allowing the mega rich to funnel as much as they want whenever they want into their interest creates a level playing field?

Quoting lylalane7275:

It creates a level playing field.  Fair for all.

lylalane7275
by Silver Member on Apr. 3, 2014 at 1:20 PM

Until we can remove the pay to play cronies from Washington (both sides), we need a level playing field.

Quoting Schauseil: It does? So allowing the mega rich to funnel as much as they want whenever they want into their interest creates a level playing field?
Quoting lylalane7275:

It creates a level playing field.  Fair for all.


Schauseil
by Silver Member on Apr. 3, 2014 at 1:25 PM
A level playing field would be to ban corporations from donating, because businesses are not people, and restricting how much ANYONE can donate each election cycle. Which we did the latter, for almost 40 years. Now elections are simply bought and paid for.

Quoting lylalane7275:

Until we can remove the pay to play cronies from Washington (both sides), we need a level playing field.

Quoting Schauseil: It does? So allowing the mega rich to funnel as much as they want whenever they want into their interest creates a level playing field?

Quoting lylalane7275:

It creates a level playing field.  Fair for all.

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)