called Choosing Cesarean: A Natural Birth Plan. The basic premise of the book is to present the case that a planned, elective c-section at 39 weeks is safer than a planned vaginal birth.
I never heard of this book before (it was just published this year) and I almost checked it out but decided I have better things to do with my time!
This seriously makes my blood boil!!!! Please tell me why the "evidence" wouldnt be found else where?
"By offering a wealth of medical evidence from around the world, which readers are unlikely to find elsewhere, the authors demonstrate beyond doubt that a planned cesarean at thirty-nine weeks is the safest way for a baby to be born. For mothers, although the risks in each case are different, it is no less safe than a vaginal birth."



- Mrs.Salz
on Aug. 9, 2012 at 11:48 AM