Welcome to CafeMom
join our community and talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

We won't show your age or birthday to anyone unless you want us to!

Whitney Houston’s Dead Body Is Now on Newsstands Everywhere

Posted by on Feb. 22, 2012 at 7:43 PM
  • 26 Replies

This Casket Photo of Whitney Houston’s Dead Body Is Now on Newsstands Everywhere

Last week, the National Enquirer had us reeling from a morbid photo shoot in which a model was paid to pose as Whitney Houston's dead body. This week, they take it to a whole new level: The tabloid printed open-coffin images from Whitney Houston's viewing. That's her corpse on the cover. While it is customary, in certain cultures, for family and friends to gather for a final viewing of the dead, this particular image is invasive in that the viewing was not for public consumption. But here it is, at your grocery store checkout. The publication was certainly not invited to the funeral home in Newark, and must have paid someone for an illicit cameraphone picture. But when it comes to photos of the dead, this is less out-of-the-norm than you might think. The New York Times published an image of Muammar Gaddafi's bloody corpse on the front page in October of last year; after the horrible earthquake in Haiti, photographs of corpses accompanied many news reports, in an attempt to convey the sheer scope of the tragedy.

Whether or not a printing a photo of a corpse is newsworthy — or ethical — is arguable, and there are strong cases for both sides: Images are news. Post-mortem photography has provided closure for the living for over 150 years.

The issue will be at newsstands and checkout lines in grocery stores across the country, where fans may wince, then reach out and spend $3.79 for a glimpse of their beloved star's final moments. Often when faced with news that someone is deceased, our reaction is, "I can't believe it." Funerals and viewings offer a concrete touchstone. Seeing is believing. That said: The context is upsetting (though, to be honest, not terribly surprising), since we can assume that the Houston family did not grant permission for the image to be printed, and someone made a wad of cash from its sale. It's also disturbing because Whitney's "last photo" is in the same issue as a story about Courtney from The Bachelor's "pregnancy drama" and an article titled "Ashton Kutcher Goes Cougar Hunting Again."


Posted by on Feb. 22, 2012 at 7:43 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies:
tpayne87
by Tiffany on Feb. 22, 2012 at 8:01 PM

 Whether its real or fake.. That's just not right at all!!

krisdev67
by Pamela on Feb. 22, 2012 at 8:23 PM
3 moms liked this

 Those dirty motherf*ckers...the person that actually took the picture and sold it.  Damn!  If I were her family I'd be SOOOO pissed right now!  That's exactly why her family wanted it PRIVATE! smmfh!

dorkish_face
by I am McLovin on Feb. 22, 2012 at 8:29 PM
Sad thing is people were suppose to have signed a paper saying that they would not take pictures, nor sell or release them to media. It's sick that someone couldn't respect her or her family, and went behind their back and did it anyway. its like just forget about the family grieving at all, its so trifflin, and tasteless !!! I hope they find who it was that did that, and sue the hell out of them, and are able to take the magazine off of the stands !! Just like KrisDev67 said that's why the family wanted it private, someone always has to mess up something !!!
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
Princess223
by Silver Member on Feb. 22, 2012 at 8:32 PM
2 moms liked this


Quoting krisdev67:

 Those dirty motherf*ckers...the person that actually took the picture and sold it.  Damn!  If I were her family I'd be SOOOO pissed right now!  That's exactly why her family wanted it PRIVATE! smmfh!



Krystle21
by Member on Feb. 22, 2012 at 8:39 PM
Wow that's sad
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
2timezthefun
by Silver Member on Feb. 22, 2012 at 8:40 PM

that is so sad all people care about is money and what's the quickest way to get it they didnt even seem to care about how this was invading her family's privacy or how it would effect them 

MsVanqueOsg
by Bronze Member on Feb. 22, 2012 at 8:48 PM

 I'm going to call you "Info Lady"! Can I do that?

earthtone
by Bronze Member on Feb. 22, 2012 at 8:49 PM

SMH unbelievable

.Beloved.
by Member on Feb. 22, 2012 at 8:51 PM

disgusting. from what I've seen on television this picture was taken at a private viewing for family and close friends, so within that circle someone who was 'close' to whitney disgraced her. everyone involved in this situation should be ashamed of themselves! they have NO respect for the deceased, and we wonder why our (general) generation is so effed up.

RobinSun
by Bronze Member on Feb. 22, 2012 at 8:58 PM
I think everyone has pretty much summed up how I feel about it.
SMDH


~Whats understood doesn't need to be explained~
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Welcome to CafeMom
join our community and talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

We won't show your age or birthday to anyone unless you want us to!
Advertisement