
There was some buzzing this morning about the fact that Farrah Fawcett was not recognized in the "In Memoriam" montage at the Academy Awards last night. Some thought it must have been a mistake, but that's not the case.
A spokeswoman for the Academy:
I would not say that it was an oversight," Leslie Unger, spokeswoman for the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, tells E! News. "No matter how carefully and how conscientiously people address who is included, there are people who just simply can't be. In any given year there will always be some people that other people think should have been included and that there's more justification for one person versus another," says Unger. "It is impossible to include everybody."
Craig Nevius, a close friend of Farrah's is not buying it:
how you can discount Extremities [which earned her a Globe nom for Best Actress in a Drama], The Apostle [which earned her an Independent Spirit nom for Best Supporting Actress] and Dr. T and the Women, I don't know.
Some are disgruntled, saying that the Academy made sure Michael Jackson was included when he had a much smaller resume than Farrah.
What do you think? Do you think she was snubbed because she was more well-known for her TV roles?









- maciymommieof3
on Mar. 8, 2010 at 8:14 PM