Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Pop Culture Junkies Pop Culture Junkies

Was Jack the Ripper a woman?

Posted by on May. 12, 2012 at 10:49 AM
  • 8 Replies
Jackie' the Ripper: Was the Infamous Serial Killer a Woman?
LiveScience.com - Thu, 10th May 2012 09:10 PM

It's history's most famous unsolved crime spree. In 1888, a serial killer who came to be known as Jack the Ripper gruesomely murdered five prostitutes in London's Whitechapel district. More than 100 men, from Lewis Carroll to Queen Victoria's grandson, have since been labeled suspects, and the guesswork has spawned an entire field of study, known as "Ripperology." Now, a new book turns the speculation on its head, by arguing that Jack the Ripper was actually a woman.John Morris, a retired lawyer living in Ireland, has implicated Lizzie Williams, the wife of the physician Sir John Williams, who was himself labeled a Ripper suspect in a 2005 book. Morris claims Lizzie killed the prostitutes out of anger over being infertile. Despair over her condition is also what drove her to remove the wombs of three of her victims.

Tantalizing as this new theory may be, other Ripperologists have decried the notion.In his book, "Jack The Ripper: The Hand Of A Woman" (Seren, 2012), Morris cites as evidence the fact that none of the five murdered prostitutes was sexually assaulted, and that the personal items of one, Annie Chapman, were laid out at her feet "in a feminine manner." Moreover, three small buttons from a woman's boot were found in blood near the body of another victim, and remnants of women's clothing, including a cape, skirt and hat, were found in the fireplace ashes of a third victim, Mary Kelly. These items did not belong to the victims.Additionally, Morris presents evidence that Kelly was having an affair with Lizzie's husband, Sir John, who ran abortion clinics in Whitechapel. Morris also found documentary evidence suggesting that Lizzie suffered a nervous breakdown soon after the horrific killing spree.

"The case for a woman murderer is overwhelming, but unfortunately it does not sit well in some quarters where such a theory flies in the face of long-held beliefs," Morris was quoted as saying in the Daily Telegraph. "Because everyone believes that the murderer was a man, all the evidence that points to a woman has been ignored."Indeed, the theory has been met with skepticism.Paul Begg, a leading Jack the Ripper expert who has authored several books on the subject of his identity, thinks the case for Lizzie Williams is weak. "The original book putting John Williams in the frame was bad but this one is even worse," Begg told the Daily Express.Sir John Williams was obstetrician to members of the British Royal Family, and was accused of the Ripper crimes in "Uncle Jack" (Orion, 2005), co-written by one of his descendants, Tony Williams. The book claims that the surgeon knew the victims personally, and killed and mutilated them in an attempt to research the causes of infertility. However, outside experts later showed that much of the research in the book was flawed; for example, a key piece of documentary evidence supposedly connecting Williams to one of the Ripper victims was found not to be in the original source document that was cited.Clearly, the case of the Whitechapel murders is far from closed.


**What do you think? Do you think it could have been a woman? Is his evidence weak?**
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
by on May. 12, 2012 at 10:49 AM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-8):
gammie
by on May. 12, 2012 at 11:35 AM
I believe it was a man and person from Royalty.

Sorry the cursive writing is hard to read.
MamaMandee
by Mandee on May. 12, 2012 at 12:05 PM

Interesting! 

gmadiane
by on May. 12, 2012 at 12:06 PM

Hubby told me about this earlier, i still think it is a man

jltplk25
by Platinum Member on May. 12, 2012 at 5:12 PM
It could be. I dont think it couldnt have been a woman though. Women as serial killers arent as heard of but still happen. I think it would be a real shocker if they finally figured out who did it, regardless of sex.

Quoting gmadiane:

Hubby told me about this earlier, i still think it is a man

Posted on CafeMom Mobile
TateTwo
by on May. 12, 2012 at 5:41 PM

women can snap.  maybe it was a woman.

jltplk25
by Platinum Member on May. 12, 2012 at 7:28 PM
1 mom liked this
Exactly. Kind of interesting that the woman had a breakdown after the murders. Could be a fluke, but then again....

Quoting TateTwo:

women can snap.  maybe it was a woman.

Posted on CafeMom Mobile
BompsMum
by on May. 12, 2012 at 8:35 PM

could it have been a woman? yes. is the evidence compeling enough to convince me? nope.

first of all - the victims were mutiliated in a way that made the police think it was someone with surgical knowlege, and women back then werent surgeons.

the clothes that were women's but not of the victims- ever heard of a costume to blend in?

also, like someone else had pointed out- women are less likely to be serial killers. to snap- if she killed multiple women in one swoop, that would be a mass murderer, not a serial killer which takes place over time-less of a snap situation than a drive to kill.

the other thing that they pointed out- the women werent sexually assaulted, but sometimes murder is the 'pleasure' and not the act of sex for a murderer.

jltplk25
by Platinum Member on May. 12, 2012 at 9:28 PM
1 mom liked this
That would have been me. Lol. While it might be unlikely, i still find it fascinating.

Quoting BompsMum:

could it have been a woman? yes. is the evidence compeling enough to convince me? nope.

first of all - the victims were mutiliated in a way that made the police think it was someone with surgical knowlege, and women back then werent surgeons.

the clothes that were women's but not of the victims- ever heard of a costume to blend in?

also, like someone else had pointed out- women are less likely to be serial killers. to snap- if she killed multiple women in one swoop, that would be a mass murderer, not a serial killer which takes place over time-less of a snap situation than a drive to kill.

the other thing that they pointed out- the women werent sexually assaulted, but sometimes murder is the 'pleasure' and not the act of sex for a murderer.

Posted on CafeMom Mobile
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)