Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Another firefighter case goes to the Supreme Court

Posted by on May. 24, 2010 at 12:16 PM
  • 2 Replies
By JESSE J. HOLLAND, Associated Press Writer Jesse J. Holland, Associated Press Writer - 1 hr 2 mins ago

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court ruled Monday that a group of African Americans did not wait too long to sue Chicago over a hiring test they challenged as discriminatory, freeing them to further press their case.

It is the second time in as many years that the high court has tackled discrimination in testing within the firefighting ranks. In a landmark case last year, the Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision said New Haven, Conn., violated white firefighters' civil rights, throwing out an exam in which no African-Americans scored high enough to be promoted to lieutenant or captain.

In Monday's opinion, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the court that the applicants' lawsuit over a city of Chicago test used to weed out potential firefighter trainee applicants was not too late.

Anyone who scored 64 or below was deemed not qualified. But the city set a second cutoff score of 89 points.

Officials told applicants who scored below 89 but above 64 that although they passed the test, they likely would not be hired because of the large number of people who scored 89 or above. The majority of those in the top-scoring group were white; only 11 percent were black.

People are supposed to sue within 300 days after an employment action they seek to challenge as unlawful.

The city says the clock started when it announced the use of the test scores on Jan. 26, 1996. The first lawsuit in the case was filed on March 31, 1997, 430 days after the city announced the results.

But the plaintiffs say a new act of discrimination also happened each time the scores were used in hiring firefighter trainees between May 1996 and October 2001.

A U.S. District judge agreed with the black applicants, but the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned that decision.

In Monday's high court ruling, Scalia said: "It may be true that the City's January 1996 decision to adopt the cutoff score (and to create a list of the applicants above it) gave rise to a freestanding disparate impact claim. ... But it does not follow that no new violation occurred - and no new claims could arise - when the City implemented that decision down the road. If petitioners could prove that the City 'used' the 'practice' that 'causes a disparate impact,' they could prevail."

                


MOM'S WITH TEENS Group MOD








 




 




 




  

by on May. 24, 2010 at 12:16 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-2):
atlmom2
by Susie on May. 24, 2010 at 12:35 PM

I see it as if you have enough applicants that got over 89, why do you want to hire someone with a 64?  Don't you want the best of the best? 

My dh recruits for his work at the college he went to.  He won't even look at anyone with a gpa under 3.5 and most he hires are 3.7-4.0.  He wants a well rounded good quality employee and also someone that can handle the 2 year finance program and the classes they have to take at work.  You have to have 85% or better to pass any quiz or tests and if you get 2 of them lower than 84% you are fired so you have to be able to handle the classes and work.  He doesn't care who he hires if they fit the requirements. 

I think the requirements that 64 passes that test is a little low.  64 in most classes are a D or F. 

fireangel5
by Member on May. 25, 2010 at 12:14 AM

That is the problem with this city and the dept.

A group of white firefighters who were well qualified for promotion yet were mysteriously passed over sued and won, they were discriminated against according to the courts.

But our commisioner just retired after being accussed of sexual harrasement even though he is quoted as saying that he doesn't have to hit on women, God blessed him so that women always hit on him.

The leadership in this city and dept is a joke!

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)