Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

The Cafe The Cafe

What do you think of the new lice policy? Is your school lenient?

Anonymous
Posted by Anonymous
  • 22 Replies
WASHINGTON — Some schools are letting kids with live lice in their hair back in the classroom, a less restrictive policy that has parents scratching their heads.

“Lice is icky, but it's not dangerous,” says Deborah Pontius, the school nurse for the Pershing County School District in Lovelock, Nev. “It's not infectious, and it's fairly easy to treat.”

Previously, most schools have required children with lice to be sent home, in an attempt to prevent the spread to other children. Children haven't been allowed to return to the classroom until all the lice and nits, or lice eggs, are removed.

Also, schools customarily send notes home to let parents know that a child in class had lice so that they could be on the lookout for lice on their own children. Pontius has stopped doing that, as well.

The policy shift is designed to help keep children from missing class, shield children with lice from embarrassment and protect their privacy.

Schools in Tennessee, California, Florida, Nebraska, New Mexico and South Carolina also are adopting the more lenient lice policy.

Some questions and answers about head lice and the new policies.

Q: WHAT ARE LICE AND WHO GETS THEM?

A: Lice are tiny grayish-white bugs that infest a scalp, sucking bits of blood every few hours. Lice don't jump or fly. They crawl. They are not a sign of poor hygiene.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate that there are 6 million to 12 million head lice infestations each year in the United States among children 3 to 11 years old. While itchy and unpleasant, health experts say lice don't spread disease and are not a health hazard.

Q: IF THEY'RE NOT A HEALTH HAZARD, WHY ARE KIDS SENT HOME?

A: Schools and parents feared that children in close quarters would spread lice to one another.

Q: WHY THE CHANGE IN POLICY?

A: Itchy children probably had lice for three weeks to two months by the time they're sent to the nurse, Pontius says.

Classmates already would have been exposed. There's little additional risk of transmission, she says, if the student returns to class for a few hours until the end of the day, when a parent would pick up the child and treat for lice at home.

Pontius also doesn't send lice notes. “It gets out who had lice,” she says, and there's no need to panic parents. Parents with elementary school-aged kids should check their children's hair for lice once a week anyway, she says. If they are doing that, then there's really no need for the notes.

Q: WHAT DO THE EXPERTS SAY?

A: The American Academy of Pediatrics updated its guidelines in 2010 to adopt a “do not exclude” infested students recommendation for schools dealing with head lice. It has long encouraged schools to discontinue “no-nit” policies. The itty-bitty nits — which can often be confused with dandruff — cement themselves to the hair shaft, making removal difficult.

The National Association of School Nurses revised its position the following year. In its guidance, the association said children found with live head lice should remain in class but be discouraged from close direct head contact with others and said the school nurse should contact the parent to discuss treatment.

The association doesn't have figures on how many schools have adopted less restrictive policies. Policies vary by state and often by school district.

Q: HOW DO PARENTS FEEL?

A: Letting kids with untreated lice remain in class doesn't sit well with some parents.

“I'm appalled. I am just so disgusted,” says Theresa Rice, whose 8-year-old daughter, Jenna, has come home from her Hamilton County, Tenn., school with lice three times since August.

“It's just a terrible headache to have to deal with lice,” says Rice. To pick out the tiny nits and lice from Jenna's long blond hair is a four-hour process. Add to that all the laundry and cleaning — it's exhausting, she says. Rice had to bag up her daughter's treasured stuffed animals, which remained sealed for weeks even after Jenna was lice-free.

Jenna's school implemented a new policy in the past year that allows children with untreated lice to go home at the end of the day, be treated and then return to school. The policy, the district said, complies with the guidelines of both the Tennessee Department of Education and the CDC.

Q: WHAT DO OTHERS THINK?

A: The National Pediculosis Association in Massachusetts opposes relaxing bans on lice and says the updated policies spread the bugs. Pediculosis means infestation of lice.

“The new lice policy throws parental values for wellness and children's health under the bus,” says Deborah Altschuler, head of the Newton-based group. “It fosters complacency about head lice by minimizing its importance as a communicable parasitic disease.”

The association says lice treatment shampoos are pesticides that are not safe for children and not 100 percent effective. The group instead urges parents to screen regularly and use a special comb to manually remove lice and nits from a child's hair.

The CDC says the nits are “very unlikely to be transferred successfully to other people” — and many schools have dropped their no-nit policies. But supporters of no-nit rules, such as the National Pediculosis Association, say the eggs will hatch new lice and need to be removed before a child is considered lice-free
Posted by Anonymous on Nov. 13, 2013 at 8:37 AM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
Anonymous
by Anonymous - Original Poster on Nov. 13, 2013 at 8:38 AM
As a Mom of a child that had it and had a battle for about a month, I am appauled. Schools are gonna have the whole school with it. Absurd just because they say they are not ill they should be able to attend school with live lice.
NDADanceMom
by on Nov. 13, 2013 at 10:39 AM

That was a policy at my kids school but its back to no lice.  I made a huge stink because I would spend time and money getting rid of the lice and my child would be reinfected.  She shared a chair with a boy that had lice (morning and afternoon kinder).  Within days of returning to school my child would have it again.  I demanded an investigation or I would call a lawyer to get the cost back for the treatments,  time off work, etc.  They found out the source and the nurse did agree that my child was likely exposed to not only vermin but the toxic chemicals repeatedly because this boy could go to school with lice.  I went to a school board meeting and presented my findings and they voted to change the policy that night. 

Anonymous
by Anonymous - Original Poster on Nov. 13, 2013 at 10:48 AM
That is true. Why be exposed to chemicals and go through constant cleaning and washing everything. They should have to pay. All this just so kids with lice don't miss school. What a crock of crap.


Quoting NDADanceMom:

That was a policy at my kids school but its back to no lice.  I made a huge stink because I would spend time and money getting rid of the lice and my child would be reinfected.  She shared a chair with a boy that had lice (morning and afternoon kinder).  Within days of returning to school my child would have it again.  I demanded an investigation or I would call a lawyer to get the cost back for the treatments,  time off work, etc.  They found out the source and the nurse did agree that my child was likely exposed to not only vermin but the toxic chemicals repeatedly because this boy could go to school with lice.  I went to a school board meeting and presented my findings and they voted to change the policy that night. 


Honeygator
by on Nov. 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM

It's disgusting and nauseating that a parent would have to fight to keep a no-lice policy alive in a public school masked by reasoning they'd miss class, when in reality the school would miss that child's per dium paid by the federal government for the school to teach the child.

Every American's major problems with public education began when Warren G. Harding proposed a Federal Dept. of Education. But it would take another 57 years and Jimmy Carter to make public education a nightmare, taking control out of the hands of the states and local school boards because Carter was finally able to create United States Dept. of Education under the Department of Education Organization Act.

Now our children are dumbed down, indoctrinated into socialism, communism, a jobs program, and there's little control left in a parent's hand. Many red states have seen a huge surge in the rise of home schooling.

I feel so terribly sad for parents who have to work 2 jobs and deal with public education. Fight the idiotic policies with everything you have available to keep your schools as educational and healthy as possible.

storkradio193
by Bronze Member on Nov. 13, 2013 at 3:10 PM

My girls preschool requires being lice free in order to return to school.  I am surprised by these new rules.

Anonymous
by Anonymous on Nov. 13, 2013 at 3:14 PM

Lice isn't very common at all in the state I live in, so there haven't been any issues of an outbreak at school. I would not be okay at all with this policy. It's one of the things I just don't handle well, lice, bed bugs and other infestations like that just leave my skin crawling. I don't want my kids going to school with someone who has lice.

Malayahsmom06
by Member on Nov. 14, 2013 at 10:54 AM

That is disgusting, and quite honestly as a nurse, shes being lazy. That probably means she is not doing the head checks. I would be flipping out on them!

kacfl816
by New Member on Nov. 14, 2013 at 11:41 AM
I was sent home twice from school because they said I had lice. I never had lice. I was in high school and was severely bullied about it for years. I agree something should be done to prevent embarrassment but kids with it shouldn't be left in class with the other children all day. And nurses should be trained much better. I was told I had nits in ny hair but no live lice. I have dandruff. . I was so embarrassed. After this happened twice.
Marimaru
by on Nov. 14, 2013 at 12:35 PM

If the kids can go back to school with lice in their head, what's the incentive for people to jump on treating it?  I don't see this going well.

MommyOfOne2710
by Member on Nov. 14, 2013 at 12:38 PM
I got lice when it was spreading throughout the whole school. This new policy is ridiculous... I don't want to constantly deal with lice when my son is in school. Around here, if it's caught early enough, it won't spread. But give it a while and everyone in the school has it.. I don't even know what to say.
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)