RANDOM QUESTION OF THE NIGHT! PLEASE VOTE

[Septpreggo]

is 2 days too short of a stay, obviously cesearans stay longer as do babys or moms with complications, but stays were longer decades ago, do u think the shorter stays are good or bad? just wondering

[-xoxo-]

We don't even get 2 days where I'm at. If you have your baby early in the morning, you're going home that night. 

[baby1love]

I had my DD on a Saturday and got to go home on a Monday .The law is that a baby has to stay in the hospital 48 hours after it's time of birth where I live. 

[mysti26]

I did just fine with mine and the first 2 I only stayed 24 hours. My son I stayed longer due to his circumcision

[Christy78]

 

 

   I had my son On a Thrusday and did not go home until Sunday

[gypsydancer7]

We only had to stay for 24 hours bc it was a natural birth.

[Nicole88]

I think 2 days is too long for a normal, healthy vaginal birth. I LOATHED those hospital stays because all the nurses I've ever had were shitty and horrible. I would love to have a baby in the morning and leave that night. I've had both my girls early in the morning and couldn't get discharged until late afternoon two days from then...urg.

[katiegirl]

Here if you deliver vaginally, the baby has to be 24 hours old before leaving the hospital, that's what I did! This is obviously without any kind of complications! 

[StrayMom]

Unless there is some sort of problem I am not sure why you would need to stay any longer...or want to. 

[mommyziegler]

i had my daughter tuesday at 6:35pm and i went home thursday at noon

[jillbailey26]

The hospital I delivered in has a 24 hour rule.  I could have stayed longer, but didn't want to with either of my boys.  My daughter was a c-section, I think I stayed for about 3-4 days after she was born.