Welcome to CafeMom
join our community and talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

We won't show your age or birthday to anyone unless you want us to!

Sugary soft drinks drastically increase the risk of developing pancreatic cancer, study shows...

Posted by on Feb. 9, 2010 at 9:05 AM
  • 25 Replies

Sugar Fuels Tumor Growth, Says Major New Study

Updated: 17 hours 24 minutes ago
Katie Drummond

Katie Drummond Contributor

(Feb. 8) -- Sugary soft drinks drastically increase the risk of developing pancreatic cancer, according to a long-term study of 60,000 people in Singapore.

A research team at the University of Minnesota followed thousands of men and women participating in the Singapore Chinese Health Study for 14 years. At the end of the study, published this month in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, the team found that those drank two or more soft drinks a week had an 87 percent higher risk of developing pancreatic cancer.
David McNew, Getty Images
University of Minnesota researchers found that people who downed two or more soft drinks a week had an 87 percent higher risk of developing pancreatic cancer.

Dr. Mark Pereira, the study's lead researcher, warns that the findings likely apply to the United States and other industrialized nations as well. "Singapore is a wealthy country with excellent health care," he said. "Favorite pastimes are eating and shopping, so the findings should apply to other Western countries."

Oddly enough, those who drank fruit juice, which can have as much sugar as soda, didn't have the same cancer risk. Pereira suggests that soda drinkers might have poor health habits, which exacerbate their risk of illness. Of those studied in Singapore, individuals who drank soda were more likely to smoke and eat red meat -- two lifestyle factors already linked to cancer.

The connection between sugar and pancreatic cancer makes sense: insulin, which helps the body digest sugar, is made in the pancreas. Researchers suspect that sugary soda interferes with the body's insulin levels, which then contributes to cancerous cell growth in the pancreas.

Diabetes, another illness in which the body's insulin production is compromised, is a known risk factor for pancreatic cancer. The onset of diabetes later in life can also be an early symptom.

Determining the cause of pancreatic cancer could save thousands of lives a year: 230,000 people are diagnosed worldwide each year, and the American Cancer Society estimates that only 5 percent survive for five years.

But the study isn't a definitive answer. Out of the 60,000 individuals studied, 140 developed pancreatic cancer. Of those, 18 cases occurred in patients who'd consumed large quantities of soda, 12 occurred in those who drank soda occasionally, and 110 occurred in those who never consumed the sugary beverages.

In their analysis, the researchers acknowledge that the small numbers limit the power of the data, and "giv[e] potential to a chance association." The team also cites four previous studies that found little or no connection between soda and pancreatic cancer.

There are a handful of definitive or suggested causes for pancreatic cancer, making this study even more difficult to interpret. Aside from red meat consumption, smoking and diabetes, risk factors include genetics, ethnicity, old age, obesity and even excessive alcohol consumption.

The American Heart Association advises that women should consume fewer than 6.5 teaspoons of added sugar a day, and men should limit their consumption to 9.5 teaspoons. Given that a single can of soda contains 13 teaspoons, Americans would be wise to cut down, whether or not they're motivated by a potential cancer risk.
Filed under: Science, Health

What do you think?


Posted by on Feb. 9, 2010 at 9:05 AM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies:
DaisyAg2003
by on Feb. 9, 2010 at 9:07 AM

I still drink my Dr. Pepper....okay, I haven't had one in a while....JUST LEAVE MY POOR DR. PEPPER ALONE!....big smile mini

 

                                      

KristaP13
by on Feb. 9, 2010 at 9:08 AM

LOL

Quoting DaisyAg2003:

I still drink my Dr. Pepper....okay, I haven't had one in a while....JUST LEAVE MY POOR DR. PEPPER ALONE!....big smile mini


RmeWifey01
by Ruby Member on Feb. 9, 2010 at 9:14 AM

Thanks for this! I have a soda every day, and this might help me kick the habit.

blowing kisses

KristaP13
by on Feb. 9, 2010 at 9:15 AM

you're welcome :)

I had to post it, it's such a large study. 60,000 people over 14 years... I mean, that has to be pretty accurate right? lol

Quoting RmeWifey01:

Thanks for this! I have a soda every day, and this might help me kick the habit.

blowing kisses


mammapickle
by on Feb. 9, 2010 at 9:19 AM

Crap, my bf already recommends rehab for my mt dew addiction. Guess i'll have to start taking him seriously :(

AutymsMommy
by Ruby Member on Feb. 9, 2010 at 9:21 AM

Sure... today the studies say this. But if I lived my life based on every study that EVER told us not to do something, I would stay sitting on my couch, dehydrating, eating nothing but bread and bored stiff. I'm sure there will be a study that counters this one in a few years lol.

ShadowLark
by Platinum Member on Feb. 9, 2010 at 9:21 AM

Okay, but the study was done on Chinese people, right?  How ethnically Asain were they?  Because I know for a fact that Japanese people (and I THINK this applies to ALL Asians, but I'm not sure) have a genetic predisposition to get stomach cancer.  It's been proven, it's just one of those flukes, like the fact that Africans (and I'm pretty sure AAs) have more twins than Caucasians (and Asians have the fewest).  (Naturally occuring twins, not with the help of fertility treatments.)  So could that impact the numbers?

Also, why are they saying that sugary soft drinks are such a definitive risk factor when the vast majority of the people who developed the cancer were the ones who never TOUCHED the sugary soft drinks?  That makes no sense!

I think more study is definitely needed.  Pancreatic cancer is scary.  It's TOO silent, so that by the time you know you're sick, it's everywhere and it's too late - that's why the survival rate is so abyssmally low.  If they could figure out who to screen early and how, maybe more people could be saved.

ShadowLark
by Platinum Member on Feb. 9, 2010 at 9:23 AM


Quoting AutymsMommy:

Sure... today the studies say this. But if I lived my life based on every study that EVER told us not to do something, I would stay sitting on my couch, dehydrating, eating nothing but bread and bored stiff. I'm sure there will be a study that counters this one in a few years lol.

STUDY - singular.  And four others that this one cited say that there's no link.  It just means that more research is needed.

And I thought the studies said that bread is bad for you? ;)

KristaP13
by on Feb. 9, 2010 at 9:28 AM

It's an ongoing study, so I'm assuming there will be more answers over the years.

I'm not a scientist so I can't answer your questions LOL.

Quoting ShadowLark:

Okay, but the study was done on Chinese people, right?  How ethnically Asain were they?  Because I know for a fact that Japanese people (and I THINK this applies to ALL Asians, but I'm not sure) have a genetic predisposition to get stomach cancer.  It's been proven, it's just one of those flukes, like the fact that Africans (and I'm pretty sure AAs) have more twins than Caucasians (and Asians have the fewest).  (Naturally occuring twins, not with the help of fertility treatments.)  So could that impact the numbers?

Also, why are they saying that sugary soft drinks are such a definitive risk factor when the vast majority of the people who developed the cancer were the ones who never TOUCHED the sugary soft drinks?  That makes no sense!

I think more study is definitely needed.  Pancreatic cancer is scary.  It's TOO silent, so that by the time you know you're sick, it's everywhere and it's too late - that's why the survival rate is so abyssmally low.  If they could figure out who to screen early and how, maybe more people could be saved.

I do agree.

AutymsMommy
by Ruby Member on Feb. 9, 2010 at 9:30 AM


Quoting ShadowLark:

 

Quoting AutymsMommy:

Sure... today the studies say this. But if I lived my life based on every study that EVER told us not to do something, I would stay sitting on my couch, dehydrating, eating nothing but bread and bored stiff. I'm sure there will be a study that counters this one in a few years lol.

STUDY - singular.  And four others that this one cited say that there's no link.  It just means that more research is needed. Study being singular is more reason to be skeptical lol.

And I thought the studies said that bread is bad for you? ;)

Wheat free, gluton free, nut free, calorie free bread?


I am a Private School sending, Vaccinating, Non spanking, Nightmare Cuddling, Dessert Giving, Homework Helping, Bedtime Kissing, Book Reading, Academic pushing Mum. I believe in the benefit of organized after school activities. I believe in spoiling my children. I believe that I have seen the village and I do not want it raising my child - I will do that, Thank You. I believe that a woman's place is in the home taking care of her house, children and husband. I am submissive and proud, my husband is head of my home. I am a proud, traditional Roman Catholic, as is my husband... Yes we are teaching our children that The Church is the only Church.               Aimee


Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Welcome to CafeMom
join our community and talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

We won't show your age or birthday to anyone unless you want us to!