Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

The CafeMom Newcomers Club The CafeMom Newcomers Club

NCAA gives punishment: Sanctions include $60 million fine, 4 -year bowl ban, vacating wins from 1998-2011

Posted by   + Show Post

INDIANAPOLIS - The NCAA handed down severe punishments to Penn State on Monday in the wake of a sex abuse scandal, including a $60 million fine, a four-year bowl ban and the vacating of all football wins from 1998-2011.

Also, the football program's scholarship allowance have been reduced from 25 to 15 per year for four years.

The NCAA, led by president Mark Emmert, called the school's behavior "egregious." Emmert said the school has "shaken our confidence" and that the sanctions "reflect the magnitude" of the school's actions.

The NCAA announcement a day after Penn State took down its famed statue of Joe Paterno, six months to the day since his death from lung cancer. The university said leaving it up would be a "recurring wound" for Sandusky's victims. An accomplished defensive coordinator, Sandusky was convicted of molesting young boys over more than a decade.

NCAA president Mark Emmert put the Penn State matter on the fast track. Other cases that were strictly about violating the NCAA rulebook have dragged on for months and even years. There was no sign that the infractions committee so familiar to college sports fans was involved this time around as Emmert moved quickly, no doubt aided by the July 12 release of the report by former FBI director Louis Freeh and what it said about Paterno and the rest of the Penn State leadership.

The investigation focused partly on university officials' decision not to go to child-welfare authorities in 2001 after a coaching assistant told Paterno that he had seen Sandusky sexually abusing a boy in the locker room showers. Penn State officials already knew about a previous allegation against Sandusky by that time, from 1998.

Slideshow
Joe Paterno's legacy in cartoons
Click here to view this cartoon slideshow.

more photos

The leaders, the report said, "repeatedly concealed critical facts relating to Sandusky's child abuse from authorities, the university's board of trustees, the Penn State community and the public at large."

 

Sandusky is awaiting sentencing after being convicted last month of sexually abusing 10 boys over 15 years.

Emmert had warned Penn State last fall that the NCAA would be examining the "exercise of institutional control" within the athletic department, and said it was clear that "deceitful and dishonest behavior" could be considered a violation of ethics rules. So, too, could a failure to exhibit moral values or adhere to ethics guidelines.

The Freeh report also said school had "decentralized and uneven" oversight of compliance issues — laws, regulations, policies and procedures — as required by the NCAA.

Recent major scandals, such as improper payments to the family of Heisman Trophy winner Reggie Bush while he was at Southern California, and players at Ohio State trading memorabilia for cash and tattoos, have resulted in bowl bans and the loss of scholarships.

Current NCAA rules limit the so-called "death penalty" to colleges already on probation that commit another major violation. That was the case when SMU had its program suspended in the mid-80s, the last time the punishment was imposed on a major college football program.

NCAA leaders have indicated in recent months they are willing to return to harsher penalties for the worst offenses.

"This is completely different than an impermissible benefits scandal like (what) happened at SMU, or anything else we've dealt with. This is as systemic a cultural problem as it is a football problem. There have been people that said this wasn't a football scandal," Emmert told PBS recently. "It was that but much more. And we'll have to figure out exactly what the right penalties are. I don't know that past precedent makes particularly good sense in this case because it's really an unprecedented problem."

As Penn State awaited its fate, construction workers removed the larger-than-life monument of its Hall of Fame coach. The Paterno family released a statement criticizing Penn State's decision to remove the statue, saying it was made in haste and before all the facts about Paterno's role in the Sandusky scandal were known.

The bronze statue, weighing more than 900 pounds, was erected in 2001 in honor of Paterno's record-setting 324th Division I coaching victory and his "contributions to the university." Penn State President Rodney Erickson said he decided the sculpture had to come down because it "has become a source of division and an obstacle to healing."

 

 

Noon news just said that 40 scholarships are lost. NICE.

by on Jul. 23, 2012 at 9:22 AM
Replies (11-20):
alwayskk
by on Jul. 23, 2012 at 9:37 AM

Then my next question is why aren't all of them involved considered mandated reporters? The second a public university engages in a program for minors, they should all become mandated reporters.

FlowerGirl777
by on Jul. 23, 2012 at 9:38 AM

He was the higher up - and the Freeh report says he was involved in covering it up. 

Quoting momto3infl:

 I agree with financial and bowl ban-but taking away the wins along with taking away Paterno statue.  He is not around to defend himself he stated before his death he told his higher ups it is not his fault they didnt do anything-he actually never saw what happened from what I remember reading so he shouldnt be the scapgoat for the school.  Higher ups should take the blame.


momdoes
by Platinum Member on Jul. 23, 2012 at 9:41 AM


Quoting alwayskk:

Then my next question is why aren't all of them involved considered mandated reporters? The second a public university engages in a program for minors, they should all become mandated reporters.


Maybe bc then there would no one to pin point the blame to. It would have to go entirely to the whole school, which is not fair. Penn State is HUGE, with alot of people in different roles, with different responsibilites. Wouldnt work. The one person who did the crime is done, those who knew are done, now they punish the ones not guilty? Not fair to me.

momto3infl
by Ruby Member on Jul. 23, 2012 at 9:42 AM

 He was head coach there are higher up than that in college-I know for a fact.  I still feel that the reports still trying to point it at someone instead of EVEN HIGHER PEOPLE.

Quoting FlowerGirl777:

He was the higher up - and the Freeh report says he was involved in covering it up. 

Quoting momto3infl:

 I agree with financial and bowl ban-but taking away the wins along with taking away Paterno statue.  He is not around to defend himself he stated before his death he told his higher ups it is not his fault they didnt do anything-he actually never saw what happened from what I remember reading so he shouldnt be the scapgoat for the school.  Higher ups should take the blame.

 

 

alwayskk
by on Jul. 23, 2012 at 9:43 AM


Quoting momdoes:


Quoting alwayskk:

Then my next question is why aren't all of them involved considered mandated reporters? The second a public university engages in a program for minors, they should all become mandated reporters.


Maybe bc then there would no one to pin point the blame to. It would have to go entirely to the whole school, which is not fair. Penn State is HUGE, with alot of people in different roles, with different responsibilites. Wouldnt work. The one person who did the crime is done, those who knew are done, now they punish the ones not guilty? Not fair to me.

It would apply to anyone involved with a program that involves minors. Anyone who knew about it and didn't report would be in trouble. Anyone who wasn't involved or didn't know about it wouldn't be in trouble, so in what way would we be punishing the not guilty?

kitty8199
by on Jul. 23, 2012 at 9:44 AM
I agree with the others, this is punishing the inncocent.
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
FlowerGirl777
by on Jul. 23, 2012 at 9:45 AM

He was Joe Pa. You could read up on the Freeh report. I think there are emails proving that he wanted the matter kept hushed up. There was evidence showing this. 

And despite whatever titles eveyone had, HE was the one with the power. He controlled everything adn everyone in the football department. That is what I read. 

He knew -that is why Sanduskey did not get promoted. But he still allowed him to roam around the place with young boys. 

The football team can just transfer to another university.

Quoting momto3infl:

 He was head coach there are higher up than that in college-I know for a fact.  I still feel that the reports still trying to point it at someone instead of EVEN HIGHER PEOPLE.

Quoting FlowerGirl777:

He was the higher up - and the Freeh report says he was involved in covering it up. 

Quoting momto3infl:

 I agree with financial and bowl ban-but taking away the wins along with taking away Paterno statue.  He is not around to defend himself he stated before his death he told his higher ups it is not his fault they didnt do anything-he actually never saw what happened from what I remember reading so he shouldnt be the scapgoat for the school.  Higher ups should take the blame.


 


momdoes
by Platinum Member on Jul. 23, 2012 at 9:46 AM
1 mom liked this

It's punishing the whole entire school. The entire school is not at fault. That how I feel anyway. Its like sending the entire family to jail when one uncle molests someone. They send grandma, anunts, neices and other nephews who had nothing to do with it to jail. They punish those not involved to make the one who did LOOK like they are being punished by them.

NCAA punished the whole school for what those assholes did. The whole school is not at fault. Yes, make the school pay the millions to the victims, but the rest only hurts those not involved. IMO

Quoting momto3infl:

 He was head coach there are higher up than that in college-I know for a fact.  I still feel that the reports still trying to point it at someone instead of EVEN HIGHER PEOPLE.

Quoting FlowerGirl777:

He was the higher up - and the Freeh report says he was involved in covering it up. 

Quoting momto3infl:

 I agree with financial and bowl ban-but taking away the wins along with taking away Paterno statue.  He is not around to defend himself he stated before his death he told his higher ups it is not his fault they didnt do anything-he actually never saw what happened from what I remember reading so he shouldnt be the scapgoat for the school.  Higher ups should take the blame.

 

 


ladyraven16
by Platinum Member on Jul. 23, 2012 at 9:46 AM
It's to be sure that this never happens again. If they let Penn St get away with a slap on the wrist for this cover up the NCAA's integrity would be gone in most people's eyes. The kids that go there can transfer without a penalty so the NCAA is giving them an out because they realize it wasn't their fault.

Quoting momdoes:



Quoting alwayskk:


Then my next question is why aren't all of them involved considered mandated reporters? The second a public university engages in a program for minors, they should all become mandated reporters.



Maybe bc then there would no one to pin point the blame to. It would have to go entirely to the whole school, which is not fair. Penn State is HUGE, with alot of people in different roles, with different responsibilites. Wouldnt work. The one person who did the crime is done, those who knew are done, now they punish the ones not guilty? Not fair to me.

Posted on CafeMom Mobile
FlowerGirl777
by on Jul. 23, 2012 at 9:48 AM

I agree. 

Quoting ladyraven16:

It's to be sure that this never happens again. If they let Penn St get away with a slap on the wrist for this cover up the NCAA's integrity would be gone in most people's eyes. The kids that go there can transfer without a penalty so the NCAA is giving them an out because they realize it wasn't their fault.

Quoting momdoes:



Quoting alwayskk:


Then my next question is why aren't all of them involved considered mandated reporters? The second a public university engages in a program for minors, they should all become mandated reporters.



Maybe bc then there would no one to pin point the blame to. It would have to go entirely to the whole school, which is not fair. Penn State is HUGE, with alot of people in different roles, with different responsibilites. Wouldnt work. The one person who did the crime is done, those who knew are done, now they punish the ones not guilty? Not fair to me.


Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN