Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

The CafeMom Newcomers Club The CafeMom Newcomers Club

Judge In Zimmerman Case Pressured by Obama Administration? Please read and give me your opinion!

Posted by   + Show Post

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Infowars.com
July 11, 2013

Speculation is raging that the judge in the George Zimmerman case could have been put under pressure by the Obama administration after she staged a bizarre outburst during which she interrogated Zimmerman while repeatedly silencing his lawyers.

The hostile exchange began when Judge Debra Nelson asked Zimmerman if he planned to testify.

Essentially, Judge Nelson told Zimmerman he had the “absolute right to remain silent” but then proceeded to demand he answer her questions interrogation-style while silencing his lawyers.

Defense attorney Don West twice objected to Nelson’s interrogation, prompting the judge to raised her voice and exclaim, “Your objection is overruled!” in a manner more befitting of an angry parent lecturing a child than a legal professional.

Both of Zimmerman’s lawyers appeared shocked as attorney Mark O’Mara asked under his breath, “what is going on?”

Several legal experts and observers said the outburst was unprecedented.

“I have never seen that in more than 30 years of court reporting,” tweeted journalist Kathi Belich.

Former Senatorial candidate Richard Rivette also expressed his shock at the judge’s behavior.

“This judge is an idiot. I spent five years investigating high profile capital cases defending people from the death penalty, and worked for the Federal judiciary as an independent investigator on other cases. No judge ever inquires as to whether a defendant will testify until the entire defense case is presented. If the defense rests and does not call the defendant then the judge knows there will be no testimony. If the defense calls the defendant then that’s when the judge finds out. They have to get through the entire case first. To see if it is valid after prosecution cross-examines their witnesses and experts as to whether a defendant SHOULD testify, which is decided in private not in public, and NOT on the record. By doing this, the judge has undermined a portion of Zimmerman’s credibility. He looks like he is waffling and this is normal judge/defendant questioning, which it is NOT,” said Rivette.

Respondents to the story at the National Review Online also expressed their view that Zimmerman was being railroaded.

“A fix is in from the administration to find Zimmerman guilty regardless of what it takes,” commented one.

“By demanding that Zimmerman respond to a question, after she has assured him that he has the right to remain silent, she is undermining his right to remain silent and making it appear as though he and his attorneys are not firm in their convictions. This judge is shameless,” added another.

Judge Nelson also ruled this week that Trayvon Martin’s text messages, which showed that Martin had been involved in fights before and was trying to buy or sell a gun, cannot be shown to the jury, which some suggested was another indication of an anti-Zimmerman bias.

Nelson also granted a request by prosecutors to block the defense’s attempt to show the jury a computer-animated depiction of the fight between Martin and Zimmerman.

She is also likely to allow the jury to consider lesser charges against Zimmerman in light of the prosecution’s probable failure to prove its case for second-degree murder, another indication that the state is desperate to avoid him walking free.

Judge Nelson has been very careful at every stage of the trial to dismiss evidence or testimony that could convince the jury in favor of acquitting Zimmerman.

Now some are asking the question – did Nelson’s aggressive outburst represent an attempt to prejudice the jury against Zimmerman?

Given the likelihood that Zimmerman will be acquitted, has Judge Nelson been put under pressure by the federal government to aggressively advocate for the prosecution, just as Supreme Court Justice John Roberts was apparently pressured to vote to uphold Obamacare?

Ever since President Barack Obama personally inserted himself into the controversy by declaring Trayvon Martin to be akin to the son he never had, higher-ups have constantly meddled in the case in an effort to secure a murder charge for a scenario that Zimmerman would not normally have even been arrested for under Florida’s Stand Your Ground law.

Indeed, ex-Sanford police chief Bill Lee told CNN yesterday that “he felt pressure from city officials to arrest Zimmerman to placate the public rather than as a matter of justice,” and that his investigation “provided no probable cause to arrest Zimmerman at the scene.”

It also emerged this week that the federal government encouraged and funded last year’s protests demanding the arrest of Zimmerman via the Community Relations Service, a division of the Department of Justice. Documents obtained by Judicial Watch show that the CRS was “deployed to Sanford, FL, following the Trayvon Martin shooting to help organize and manage rallies and protests against George Zimmerman,” spending millions of dollars in the process.

Given the plethora of threats by Trayvon supporters to stage violent riots if Zimmerman is acquitted, could Nelson be under pressure to secure a charge of at least manslaughter in order to avoid nationwide civil disorder?

If that’s the case, her apparent effort to prejudice the jury clearly suggests that a mistrial has taken place.

by on Jul. 11, 2013 at 9:02 PM
Replies (21-30):
KendallsMommee
by Bronze Member on Jul. 12, 2013 at 1:14 AM
Trayvon Martin didn't break any laws, either.

Oh, but he's not here to defend himself.


Quoting lovebugs_mom906:

I get a little frustrated when people fail to look at all the evidence, all the timeline information, witness statements - all of it - and come to conclusions that don't add up. Did George Zimmerman follow Maryin? Yes. Did he break any laws? Not a single one. Did he lose sight of Martin? Yes he did. Do please explain why Martin attacked him, if he lost Zimmerman? Please tell me exactly what the right amount of beating a man should endure before defending himself?

Martins death was tragic for those who knew him. But that doesn't mean that Zimmerman should be hung out to dry for defending himself.




Quoting KendallsMommee:

Apples and oranges. Skimpy clothes and rape? Really? I'll let that go....wow.





Anyway.....If someone was following me, in the dark, and I had no idea who they were, you are damn right that I would defend myself. Most people would.






Quoting Whovian82:


So...someone following another person deserves to get jumped?...I bet a woman wearing skimpy clothing deserves to get raped?




Quoting KendallsMommee:

If he wasn't profiling this "punk " and following him like a wannabe vigilante, he wouldn't have been attacked. Easy to do when you have a gun, though.







Z is guilty of manslaughter at the very least.








Quoting MrsKaufold1990:

actually it is a race issue. 

sorry, but you are so closed minded if you don't think it is. 

if this wasn't about race, the trial would not have been so quick to come up. 

if he would have shot a white man, it wouldn't have been all over like it is/was. 

and he wouldn't have had to murder this punk if the punk wouldn't have attacked him. 

bottom line.






Quoting MomTiara19:











Quoting MrsKaufold1990:





i think he is innocent....





but this is a race issue, and i think that the jury knows that if he is found innocent america will go into a riot, and try to kill him










 Innocent of what?Zimmerman did murder Trayvon did he not?





This is not a race issue...it is a human race issue.One human being murdered another human being.





If they were both the same race there wouldnt be this bias circus.No one wants a riot....only justice and peace...whatever the outcome.












ditsyjo
by Gold Member on Jul. 12, 2013 at 1:16 AM

 

nor would it have happened if martin would have simply kept walking until he got home rather than starting a fight.

Quoting KendallsMommee:

In a perfect world there would be unicorns and pots of gold at the end of rainbows, too.

The last thing I or 99% of the population would think about, in that situation, at that exact moment, would be using our "words ".

Bottom line is, he shouldn't have been following that young man, especially after the 911 dispatcher told him not to.

None of this would've happened if Z wasn't trying to be the cop that he wanted to be.


Quoting Whovian82:

 

When you think about the content..no it is NOT apples to oranges.  You are basically saying someone deserved a physical altercation simply by their non physical behavior.  And GZ asked him why he was there.  I don't care who you are, there was no reason to fight.  Use your friggin words.  If you go to that zone with a situation like this...that is on you. But do NOT use it as a rational excuse to attack someone.  


Quoting KendallsMommee:

Apples and oranges. Skimpy clothes and rape? Really? I'll let that go....wow.



Anyway.....If someone was following me, in the dark, and I had no idea who they were, you are damn right that I would defend myself. Most people would.




Quoting Whovian82:

 

So...someone following another person deserves to get jumped?...I bet a woman wearing skimpy clothing deserves to get raped?



Quoting KendallsMommee:

If he wasn't profiling this "punk " and following him like a wannabe vigilante, he wouldn't have been attacked. Easy to do when you have a gun, though.





Z is guilty of manslaughter at the very least.






Quoting MrsKaufold1990:

actually it is a race issue. 

sorry, but you are so closed minded if you don't think it is. 

if this wasn't about race, the trial would not have been so quick to come up. 

if he would have shot a white man, it wouldn't have been all over like it is/was. 

and he wouldn't have had to murder this punk if the punk wouldn't have attacked him. 

bottom line.

 




Quoting MomTiara19:

 




 




Quoting MrsKaufold1990:




i think he is innocent....




but this is a race issue, and i think that the jury knows that if he is found innocent america will go into a riot, and try to kill him




 




 Innocent of what?Zimmerman did murder Trayvon did he not?




This is not a race issue...it is a human race issue.One human being murdered another human being.




If they were both the same race there wouldnt be this bias circus.No one wants a riot....only justice and peace...whatever the outcome.

 




 

 



 

 


 


 

KendallsMommee
by Bronze Member on Jul. 12, 2013 at 1:18 AM
And that's presumptuous of you to think I have failed to look at all the evidence. Why? Because you have a different opinion than I do?

I've been following this case since day one. I know everything there is to know except what is in Zimmerman's mind and what WAS in Trayvon 's.


Quoting lovebugs_mom906:

I get a little frustrated when people fail to look at all the evidence, all the timeline information, witness statements - all of it - and come to conclusions that don't add up. Did George Zimmerman follow Maryin? Yes. Did he break any laws? Not a single one. Did he lose sight of Martin? Yes he did. Do please explain why Martin attacked him, if he lost Zimmerman? Please tell me exactly what the right amount of beating a man should endure before defending himself?

Martins death was tragic for those who knew him. But that doesn't mean that Zimmerman should be hung out to dry for defending himself.




Quoting KendallsMommee:

Apples and oranges. Skimpy clothes and rape? Really? I'll let that go....wow.





Anyway.....If someone was following me, in the dark, and I had no idea who they were, you are damn right that I would defend myself. Most people would.






Quoting Whovian82:


So...someone following another person deserves to get jumped?...I bet a woman wearing skimpy clothing deserves to get raped?




Quoting KendallsMommee:

If he wasn't profiling this "punk " and following him like a wannabe vigilante, he wouldn't have been attacked. Easy to do when you have a gun, though.







Z is guilty of manslaughter at the very least.








Quoting MrsKaufold1990:

actually it is a race issue. 

sorry, but you are so closed minded if you don't think it is. 

if this wasn't about race, the trial would not have been so quick to come up. 

if he would have shot a white man, it wouldn't have been all over like it is/was. 

and he wouldn't have had to murder this punk if the punk wouldn't have attacked him. 

bottom line.






Quoting MomTiara19:











Quoting MrsKaufold1990:





i think he is innocent....





but this is a race issue, and i think that the jury knows that if he is found innocent america will go into a riot, and try to kill him










 Innocent of what?Zimmerman did murder Trayvon did he not?





This is not a race issue...it is a human race issue.One human being murdered another human being.





If they were both the same race there wouldnt be this bias circus.No one wants a riot....only justice and peace...whatever the outcome.












lovebugs_mom906
by on Jul. 12, 2013 at 1:18 AM
But Zimmerman never touched him! Martin is the one who came out of hiding and attacked Zimmerman. If someone was following me, I would hi tail it to a safe spot, and not leave until I knew it was safe. I wouldn't go looking for a fight with my follower.

Martin was probably doing nothing wrong that night, until he he decided to attack Zimmerman. That's when the line of innocence was crossed, and that's the decision that cost Martin his life.


Quoting KendallsMommee:

Trayvon Martin didn't break any laws, either.



Oh, but he's not here to defend himself.




Quoting lovebugs_mom906:

I get a little frustrated when people fail to look at all the evidence, all the timeline information, witness statements - all of it - and come to conclusions that don't add up. Did George Zimmerman follow Maryin? Yes. Did he break any laws? Not a single one. Did he lose sight of Martin? Yes he did. Do please explain why Martin attacked him, if he lost Zimmerman? Please tell me exactly what the right amount of beating a man should endure before defending himself?


Martins death was tragic for those who knew him. But that doesn't mean that Zimmerman should be hung out to dry for defending himself.






Quoting KendallsMommee:

Apples and oranges. Skimpy clothes and rape? Really? I'll let that go....wow.







Anyway.....If someone was following me, in the dark, and I had no idea who they were, you are damn right that I would defend myself. Most people would.








Quoting Whovian82:


So...someone following another person deserves to get jumped?...I bet a woman wearing skimpy clothing deserves to get raped?





Quoting KendallsMommee:

If he wasn't profiling this "punk " and following him like a wannabe vigilante, he wouldn't have been attacked. Easy to do when you have a gun, though.









Z is guilty of manslaughter at the very least.










Quoting MrsKaufold1990:

actually it is a race issue. 

sorry, but you are so closed minded if you don't think it is. 

if this wasn't about race, the trial would not have been so quick to come up. 

if he would have shot a white man, it wouldn't have been all over like it is/was. 

and he wouldn't have had to murder this punk if the punk wouldn't have attacked him. 

bottom line.







Quoting MomTiara19:













Quoting MrsKaufold1990:






i think he is innocent....






but this is a race issue, and i think that the jury knows that if he is found innocent america will go into a riot, and try to kill him












 Innocent of what?Zimmerman did murder Trayvon did he not?






This is not a race issue...it is a human race issue.One human being murdered another human being.






If they were both the same race there wouldnt be this bias circus.No one wants a riot....only justice and peace...whatever the outcome.














KendallsMommee
by Bronze Member on Jul. 12, 2013 at 1:19 AM
Oh sure.

Stay in his place.

Psshhh...


Quoting ditsyjo:

 


nor would it have happened if martin would have simply kept walking until he got home rather than starting a fight.


Quoting KendallsMommee:

In a perfect world there would be unicorns and pots of gold at the end of rainbows, too.

The last thing I or 99% of the population would think about, in that situation, at that exact moment, would be using our "words ".

Bottom line is, he shouldn't have been following that young man, especially after the 911 dispatcher told him not to.

None of this would've happened if Z wasn't trying to be the cop that he wanted to be.



Quoting Whovian82:


 


When you think about the content..no it is NOT apples to oranges.  You are basically saying someone deserved a physical altercation simply by their non physical behavior.  And GZ asked him why he was there.  I don't care who you are, there was no reason to fight.  Use your friggin words.  If you go to that zone with a situation like this...that is on you. But do NOT use it as a rational excuse to attack someone.  



Quoting KendallsMommee:

Apples and oranges. Skimpy clothes and rape? Really? I'll let that go....wow.



Anyway.....If someone was following me, in the dark, and I had no idea who they were, you are damn right that I would defend myself. Most people would.





Quoting Whovian82:


 


So...someone following another person deserves to get jumped?...I bet a woman wearing skimpy clothing deserves to get raped?




Quoting KendallsMommee:

If he wasn't profiling this "punk " and following him like a wannabe vigilante, he wouldn't have been attacked. Easy to do when you have a gun, though.





Z is guilty of manslaughter at the very least.







Quoting MrsKaufold1990:


actually it is a race issue. 


sorry, but you are so closed minded if you don't think it is. 


if this wasn't about race, the trial would not have been so quick to come up. 


if he would have shot a white man, it wouldn't have been all over like it is/was. 


and he wouldn't have had to murder this punk if the punk wouldn't have attacked him. 


bottom line.


 





Quoting MomTiara19:


 





 





Quoting MrsKaufold1990:





i think he is innocent....





but this is a race issue, and i think that the jury knows that if he is found innocent america will go into a riot, and try to kill him





 





 Innocent of what?Zimmerman did murder Trayvon did he not?





This is not a race issue...it is a human race issue.One human being murdered another human being.





If they were both the same race there wouldnt be this bias circus.No one wants a riot....only justice and peace...whatever the outcome.


 





 


 




 


 



 




 

KendallsMommee
by Bronze Member on Jul. 12, 2013 at 1:22 AM
But we know for sure that Z was doing something wrong.

Following him after being told not to.

Why does everyone ignore that?


Quoting lovebugs_mom906:

But Zimmerman never touched him! Martin is the one who came out of hiding and attacked Zimmerman. If someone was following me, I would hi tail it to a safe spot, and not leave until I knew it was safe. I wouldn't go looking for a fight with my follower.



Martin was probably doing nothing wrong that night, until he he decided to attack Zimmerman. That's when the line of innocence was crossed, and that's the decision that cost Martin his life.




Quoting KendallsMommee:

Trayvon Martin didn't break any laws, either.





Oh, but he's not here to defend himself.






Quoting lovebugs_mom906:

I get a little frustrated when people fail to look at all the evidence, all the timeline information, witness statements - all of it - and come to conclusions that don't add up. Did George Zimmerman follow Maryin? Yes. Did he break any laws? Not a single one. Did he lose sight of Martin? Yes he did. Do please explain why Martin attacked him, if he lost Zimmerman? Please tell me exactly what the right amount of beating a man should endure before defending himself?



Martins death was tragic for those who knew him. But that doesn't mean that Zimmerman should be hung out to dry for defending himself.








Quoting KendallsMommee:

Apples and oranges. Skimpy clothes and rape? Really? I'll let that go....wow.









Anyway.....If someone was following me, in the dark, and I had no idea who they were, you are damn right that I would defend myself. Most people would.










Quoting Whovian82:


So...someone following another person deserves to get jumped?...I bet a woman wearing skimpy clothing deserves to get raped?






Quoting KendallsMommee:

If he wasn't profiling this "punk " and following him like a wannabe vigilante, he wouldn't have been attacked. Easy to do when you have a gun, though.











Z is guilty of manslaughter at the very least.












Quoting MrsKaufold1990:

actually it is a race issue. 

sorry, but you are so closed minded if you don't think it is. 

if this wasn't about race, the trial would not have been so quick to come up. 

if he would have shot a white man, it wouldn't have been all over like it is/was. 

and he wouldn't have had to murder this punk if the punk wouldn't have attacked him. 

bottom line.








Quoting MomTiara19:















Quoting MrsKaufold1990:







i think he is innocent....







but this is a race issue, and i think that the jury knows that if he is found innocent america will go into a riot, and try to kill him














 Innocent of what?Zimmerman did murder Trayvon did he not?







This is not a race issue...it is a human race issue.One human being murdered another human being.







If they were both the same race there wouldnt be this bias circus.No one wants a riot....only justice and peace...whatever the outcome.
















ditsyjo
by Gold Member on Jul. 12, 2013 at 1:23 AM

 

no behave like an inteligent person.... I would have kept walking faster if some one was following me on a dark night. starting a fight was stupid just like following him was stupid on zimmermans part. they both did some thing foolish and now one of them is dead and the other might as well be cause if he doesn't get life in prison someone will kill him. it is a sad situation that either of them could have easiely prevented.

Quoting KendallsMommee:

Oh sure.

Stay in his place.

Psshhh...


Quoting ditsyjo:

 


nor would it have happened if martin would have simply kept walking until he got home rather than starting a fight.


Quoting KendallsMommee:

In a perfect world there would be unicorns and pots of gold at the end of rainbows, too.

The last thing I or 99% of the population would think about, in that situation, at that exact moment, would be using our "words ".

Bottom line is, he shouldn't have been following that young man, especially after the 911 dispatcher told him not to.

None of this would've happened if Z wasn't trying to be the cop that he wanted to be.



Quoting Whovian82:


 


When you think about the content..no it is NOT apples to oranges.  You are basically saying someone deserved a physical altercation simply by their non physical behavior.  And GZ asked him why he was there.  I don't care who you are, there was no reason to fight.  Use your friggin words.  If you go to that zone with a situation like this...that is on you. But do NOT use it as a rational excuse to attack someone.  



Quoting KendallsMommee:

Apples and oranges. Skimpy clothes and rape? Really? I'll let that go....wow.



Anyway.....If someone was following me, in the dark, and I had no idea who they were, you are damn right that I would defend myself. Most people would.





Quoting Whovian82:


 


So...someone following another person deserves to get jumped?...I bet a woman wearing skimpy clothing deserves to get raped?




Quoting KendallsMommee:

If he wasn't profiling this "punk " and following him like a wannabe vigilante, he wouldn't have been attacked. Easy to do when you have a gun, though.





Z is guilty of manslaughter at the very least.







Quoting MrsKaufold1990:


actually it is a race issue. 


sorry, but you are so closed minded if you don't think it is. 


if this wasn't about race, the trial would not have been so quick to come up. 


if he would have shot a white man, it wouldn't have been all over like it is/was. 


and he wouldn't have had to murder this punk if the punk wouldn't have attacked him. 


bottom line.


 





Quoting MomTiara19:


 





 





Quoting MrsKaufold1990:





i think he is innocent....





but this is a race issue, and i think that the jury knows that if he is found innocent america will go into a riot, and try to kill him





 





 Innocent of what?Zimmerman did murder Trayvon did he not?





This is not a race issue...it is a human race issue.One human being murdered another human being.





If they were both the same race there wouldnt be this bias circus.No one wants a riot....only justice and peace...whatever the outcome.


 





 


 




 


 



 


 


 


 

KendallsMommee
by Bronze Member on Jul. 12, 2013 at 1:25 AM
I'm done.

For now....

Goodnight ladies.
lovebugs_mom906
by on Jul. 12, 2013 at 1:26 AM
Zimmerman wasn't doing anything illegal. He never broke a law. Did he act stupidly and a little creepy? Yes. But he still never broke any laws, and he never laid a finger on Martin.

Quoting KendallsMommee:

But we know for sure that Z was doing something wrong.



Following him after being told not to.



Why does everyone ignore that?




Quoting lovebugs_mom906:

But Zimmerman never touched him! Martin is the one who came out of hiding and attacked Zimmerman. If someone was following me, I would hi tail it to a safe spot, and not leave until I knew it was safe. I wouldn't go looking for a fight with my follower.





Martin was probably doing nothing wrong that night, until he he decided to attack Zimmerman. That's when the line of innocence was crossed, and that's the decision that cost Martin his life.






Quoting KendallsMommee:

Trayvon Martin didn't break any laws, either.







Oh, but he's not here to defend himself.








Quoting lovebugs_mom906:

I get a little frustrated when people fail to look at all the evidence, all the timeline information, witness statements - all of it - and come to conclusions that don't add up. Did George Zimmerman follow Maryin? Yes. Did he break any laws? Not a single one. Did he lose sight of Martin? Yes he did. Do please explain why Martin attacked him, if he lost Zimmerman? Please tell me exactly what the right amount of beating a man should endure before defending himself?




Martins death was tragic for those who knew him. But that doesn't mean that Zimmerman should be hung out to dry for defending himself.










Quoting KendallsMommee:

Apples and oranges. Skimpy clothes and rape? Really? I'll let that go....wow.











Anyway.....If someone was following me, in the dark, and I had no idea who they were, you are damn right that I would defend myself. Most people would.












Quoting Whovian82:


So...someone following another person deserves to get jumped?...I bet a woman wearing skimpy clothing deserves to get raped?







Quoting KendallsMommee:

If he wasn't profiling this "punk " and following him like a wannabe vigilante, he wouldn't have been attacked. Easy to do when you have a gun, though.













Z is guilty of manslaughter at the very least.














Quoting MrsKaufold1990:

actually it is a race issue. 

sorry, but you are so closed minded if you don't think it is. 

if this wasn't about race, the trial would not have been so quick to come up. 

if he would have shot a white man, it wouldn't have been all over like it is/was. 

and he wouldn't have had to murder this punk if the punk wouldn't have attacked him. 

bottom line.









Quoting MomTiara19:

















Quoting MrsKaufold1990:








i think he is innocent....








but this is a race issue, and i think that the jury knows that if he is found innocent america will go into a riot, and try to kill him
















 Innocent of what?Zimmerman did murder Trayvon did he not?








This is not a race issue...it is a human race issue.One human being murdered another human being.








If they were both the same race there wouldnt be this bias circus.No one wants a riot....only justice and peace...whatever the outcome.


















CharmMom1216
by Member on Jul. 12, 2013 at 1:29 AM
Omg the consiparcy theories begin.
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN