The CafeMom Newcomers Club
/ Newcomers Club - Active discussion
Join CafeMom Today (It's free and easy!) Already a member?
Educational post...
http://www.ican-online.org/pregnancy/family-centered-cesarean
The International Cesarean Awareness Network, Inc. (ICAN) opposes the use of cesarean surgery where there is no medical need. Vaginal birth is a normal, physiological process, and cesarean is major abdominal surgery. Cesarean exposes the mother to all the risks of major surgery, including a higher maternal mortality rate, infection, hemorrhage, complications of anesthesia, damage to internal organs, scar tissue, increase incidence of secondary infertility, longer recovery periods, increase in clinical postpartum depression, and complications in maternal-infant bonding and breastfeeding as well as risks to the infant of respiratory distress, prematurity and injuries from the surgery. It has been suggested that cesarean section is the safer method of birth for infants. However, scientific evidence proves that infant outcome does not improve once the cesarean rate climbs above 10 percent. All physicians take an oath to "Do no harm." This means choosing the path of least risk to patients. Medically unnecessary elective cesareans increase risk to birthing women. It is unethical and inappropriate for obstetricians to perform unnecessary surgery on a healthy woman with a normal pregnancy.
Common methods to avoid cesareans include choosing a caregiver expert in natural birth with low cesarean rates (below 15 percent is recommended), and preparing to birth naturally without induction or anesthesia medication. Medications tend to disrupt the normal process of labor and birth, and can negatively affect the mother and the baby, inviting other interventions including a cesarean. ICAN supports women’s rights to accurate, complete, evidence-based medical information; women’s right to the best and safest medical care in childbirth in situations where medical care is actually needed in childbirth. ICAN will continue to work to protect women’s rights to ethical and appropriate care in childbirth.
More of the article can be found on the link above (could not copy and paste the full text)
Danielle
ICAN supporter, Cesarean Mother, Natural Birth Advocate, Breastfeeding, Attachment Parenting, Baby wearing, Selectively Vaccinating, Pro Choice, Gay Marriage Supporting, Doula, Aspiring Midwife, Blogging, Loud Mouth, Bitch, Democrat, Stay At Home Mom, Reformed Mormon, Chiropractic Care for Children Supporting, VBAC Supporting, Home Birth Supporting, Radical Mother of Two amazing little boys.
Camden Kent and Benjamin Emil
Is there a reason why the risks would be greater for you? (Just wondering)
Quoting Kaelaasmom:
If I were to ever have another child, I would definitely have another C-section. To me, the risks of VBAC (for me) are too great for me to even consider.
Danielle
ICAN supporter, Cesarean Mother, Natural Birth Advocate, Breastfeeding, Attachment Parenting, Baby wearing, Selectively Vaccinating, Pro Choice, Gay Marriage Supporting, Doula, Aspiring Midwife, Blogging, Loud Mouth, Bitch, Democrat, Stay At Home Mom, Reformed Mormon, Chiropractic Care for Children Supporting, VBAC Supporting, Home Birth Supporting, Radical Mother of Two amazing little boys.
Camden Kent and Benjamin Emil
I guess that's a great silver lining - but it still burns me up that it's the bean-counters, not the doctors, that are pushing that change. Have you read "Babycatcher - Chronicles of a Modern Midwife" yet?
Peace,
Kat
Quoting CTRedSoxMom:I agree. I had to FIGHT tooth and nail to be able to attempt a VBAC. I had to lie to the on call OB/GYN at the hospital, as did my midwife once I was finally in labor also.
Thankfully the insurance companies are starting to get on to the link between c-sections before "due dates" and the high admission of those infants to NICU's so they are starting to cover VBAC and will not cover c-sections before 39 weeks gestation unless there is a serious medical problem (not elective).
I really believe that the tides are changing, and hopefully VBAC will go back to what it was in the early 90's.
Quoting WildKat:I think it's truly sad how the medical industry is taking this process away from us mainly because of costs and litigation risks. Birth should be handled with a case-by-case basis and not with rules like "no VBACs allowed".
Peace,
Kat
No, I haven't read the book, but I do read her blog. I am still trying to get through a book I picked up right after I had the baby (6 weeks ago) LOL
Quoting WildKat:
I guess that's a great silver lining - but it still burns me up that it's the bean-counters, not the doctors, that are pushing that change. Have you read "Babycatcher - Chronicles of a Modern Midwife" yet?
Peace,
Kat
Danielle
ICAN supporter, Cesarean Mother, Natural Birth Advocate, Breastfeeding, Attachment Parenting, Baby wearing, Selectively Vaccinating, Pro Choice, Gay Marriage Supporting, Doula, Aspiring Midwife, Blogging, Loud Mouth, Bitch, Democrat, Stay At Home Mom, Reformed Mormon, Chiropractic Care for Children Supporting, VBAC Supporting, Home Birth Supporting, Radical Mother of Two amazing little boys.
Camden Kent and Benjamin Emil
She has a blog? I'll have to google that! I had no idea! Thankyou for mentioning it! And congrats on the baby!
Quoting CTRedSoxMom:No, I haven't read the book, but I do read her blog. I am still trying to get through a book I picked up right after I had the baby (6 weeks ago) LOL
Quoting WildKat:
I guess that's a great silver lining - but it still burns me up that it's the bean-counters, not the doctors, that are pushing that change. Have you read "Babycatcher - Chronicles of a Modern Midwife" yet?
Peace,
Kat
http://babycatching.blogspot.com/
Thanks :)
I cant believe tomorrow he will be 7 weeks old already!
Quoting WildKat:
She has a blog? I'll have to google that! I had no idea! Thankyou for mentioning it! And congrats on the baby!
Danielle
ICAN supporter, Cesarean Mother, Natural Birth Advocate, Breastfeeding, Attachment Parenting, Baby wearing, Selectively Vaccinating, Pro Choice, Gay Marriage Supporting, Doula, Aspiring Midwife, Blogging, Loud Mouth, Bitch, Democrat, Stay At Home Mom, Reformed Mormon, Chiropractic Care for Children Supporting, VBAC Supporting, Home Birth Supporting, Radical Mother of Two amazing little boys.
Camden Kent and Benjamin Emil
Quoting CTRedSoxMom:
Is there a reason why the risks would be greater for you? (Just wondering)
Quoting Kaelaasmom:
If I were to ever have another child, I would definitely have another C-section. To me, the risks of VBAC (for me) are too great for me to even consider.
Yes. My daughter was 10 days late, and I never dilated. Not one centimeter. They induced me and I still wouldn't dilate, so I had the C-section. It turns out that this some sort of genetic issue that my mother also has, which caused her to have 4 C-sections. I also have group B strep, so C-section is safer for the baby than vaginal birth.

I am a non-ERF, can't wait to drop the booster, breast-fed til 6 weeks, Nestle formula using, pro-choice, Independent, open-minded, gay marriage supporting, CIO, NON-AP, former Marine mom to the only perfect child on Earth. Don't tell me how to raise my kid, and I won't tell you what's wrong with yours!
what I have always been told by my last OB doctor was that the reason why if you have one C-Section its better to have another c-section unless its been 7 years between your first born and then your second born. Its because of the possibility of your uterus being weakened from the C-Section. Not sure how true that is but thats what I was told by an OB doctor. Although my three pregnancies were vaginal deliveries I asked about the c-section just in case anything went wrong where I would need one.
Thank you, I am always interested in learning more outcomes and situations around birth.
Quoting Kaelaasmom:Yes. My daughter was 10 days late, and I never dilated. Not one centimeter. They induced me and I still wouldn't dilate, so I had the C-section. It turns out that this some sort of genetic issue that my mother also has, which caused her to have 4 C-sections. I also have group B strep, so C-section is safer for the baby than vaginal birth.
Danielle
ICAN supporter, Cesarean Mother, Natural Birth Advocate, Breastfeeding, Attachment Parenting, Baby wearing, Selectively Vaccinating, Pro Choice, Gay Marriage Supporting, Doula, Aspiring Midwife, Blogging, Loud Mouth, Bitch, Democrat, Stay At Home Mom, Reformed Mormon, Chiropractic Care for Children Supporting, VBAC Supporting, Home Birth Supporting, Radical Mother of Two amazing little boys.
Camden Kent and Benjamin Emil
It is sad that there are OB/GYN's out there passing this information along. In low risk, healthy women, VBAC is much safer for mom, and baby than a repeat cesarean, even with the risk of uterine rupture.
A woman's uterus can rupture ANY time during pregnancy once they have had a cesarean, even during a c-section, not just while trying to VBAC.
Quoting SitaStJames:
what I have always been told by my last OB doctor was that the reason why if you have one C-Section its better to have another c-section unless its been 7 years between your first born and then your second born. Its because of the possibility of your uterus being weakened from the C-Section. Not sure how true that is but thats what I was told by an OB doctor. Although my three pregnancies were vaginal deliveries I asked about the c-section just in case anything went wrong where I would need one.
Danielle
ICAN supporter, Cesarean Mother, Natural Birth Advocate, Breastfeeding, Attachment Parenting, Baby wearing, Selectively Vaccinating, Pro Choice, Gay Marriage Supporting, Doula, Aspiring Midwife, Blogging, Loud Mouth, Bitch, Democrat, Stay At Home Mom, Reformed Mormon, Chiropractic Care for Children Supporting, VBAC Supporting, Home Birth Supporting, Radical Mother of Two amazing little boys.
Camden Kent and Benjamin Emil
Me too.
QuotIf I were to ever have another child, I would definitely have another C-section. To me, the risks of VBAC (for me) are too great for me to even consider.
Only group members can reply to this post.
Check out some of today's most popular Journals: