Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

2/3 of flu illnesses in people who had the shot

Posted by on Jan. 30, 2013 at 10:05 PM
  • 5 Replies
  • 237 Total Views

I asked this question earlier today in another post: I wonder what the  flu illness and death statistics woud be if no one got vaccinated? How many of these flu illnesses are they counting that are people having reactions to the shot? This article doesn't directly answer these questions, but I thought it was interesting that 2/3 of the people getting the flu had the vaccine.

Flu Epidemic Strikes Millions of Americans Already Vaccinated Against the Flu

The USA is in an official flu pandemic panic right now, with Boston declaring a public health emergency and hospitals setting up flu treatment tents as if cities were war zones. The CDC says it’s the worst flu pandemic in a decade, and it’s of course urging everybody to get injected with flu vaccines.

But here’s the dirty little secret the vaccine industry doesn’t want you to know: Most people getting the flu right now are the same people who were vaccinated with the flu shot.

The CDC refuses to release any statistics on this, of course, because then the total hoax of the flu shot would be exposed. But I’ve been making phone calls to a large network of friends and professional contacts, and they’re all telling me the same thing: Of the people they know who are getting sick, about two-thirds routinely get flu shots!

Check with your own friends, family members or co-workers on this point. Ask the ones who got sick: Did you get a flu shot? See if the answers you get are about the same as mine: Two-thirds.

If this holds true across a larger data set, it means that flu shots actually make you MORE susceptible to the flu. That’s because far less than two-thirds of the U.S. population takes flu shots. So if two-thirds of those getting the flu this year are the same people who got flu shots, mathematically it can only mean that flu shots INCREASE vulnerability to the flu.

In this way, people who get flu shots are acting irresponsibly because they increase their risk of spreading the flu to others. Instead of taking care of their health with nutrients like vitamin D, they act with neglect and seek out a flu shot that poses a very real increased risk to public health and safety.

What’s in flu shots? Aluminum, mercury, MSG and formaldehyde

The CDC openly admits that vaccines contain a toxic cocktail and metals and synthetic chemicals that we all know cause neurological damage. Those include aluminum and mercury.

These metals and chemicals also suppress the immune system, and that’s the primary purpose of vaccines: To actually cause an epidemic so that more people rush out to buy more vaccines. The whole point is to sell more vaccines, not to improve public health. And the fastest way to sell more vaccines is to make sure the vaccines themselves contain chemicals and metals that make people more vulnerable to infection.

What, you don’t believe me? You think Big Pharma is a collection of compassionate, loving angels who care about the people more than they care about profits? Wake up and smell the chemicals. Vaccine manufacturers are, on the record, criminal organizations that are repeatedly found guilty of felony crimes — everything from price fixing to the bribery of doctors and the commission of marketing fraud.

Drug companies have zero ethics. They kill children to test their vaccines. They conduct medical experiments on prisoners and mental patients. Do you honestly think they wouldn’t use vaccines as a way to make people sick and create an infectious disease scare that sells more vaccines?

Real solutions to the flu

If you really want to stay healthy this flu season, the answer is pretty simple. It all starts with the top three nutrients for flu prevention:

1) Vitamin D
2) More vitamin D
3) And yet more vitamin D

If you’re not taking at least 5,000 IUs of vitamin D each day during the winter flu season, you’re probably vitamin D deficient and that’s making you a sitting duck for influenza.

In addition to vitamin D, there are all sorts of other herbal remedies, trace minerals (like zinc), and superfood nutrients that can help protect you.

And, of course, don’t suppress your immune system with flu shots, chemotherapy or prescription medications. All those things make you more vulnerable to infection and makes you a repeat customer for the “sick care” cartels that profit from human suffering.


by on Jan. 30, 2013 at 10:05 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-5):
emmy526
by New Owner on Jan. 31, 2013 at 6:11 AM

if anything after this debacle, pharma will be pushing harder than ever for flu shots...wait til next year..we will all hear fearmongering stories of how bad the flu was this year, and they will play on that fear, and next years masses of sheeple will buy into their BS once again, and the cycle continues.....kinda like domestic violence, in a way. ....they know they are hurting people with their product, inncocent babies even, yet they still push their abuse on parents every time they take their child in for a 'well check', the abuse of the dr continues.  And then they have the nerve to say, 'sorry, it didn't work like we thought it would, let's try it again', and another assault is launched. 

emmy526
by New Owner on Jan. 31, 2013 at 8:10 AM

via fb:

Relative flu numbers or real flu numbers? The CDC is claiming about a 60% relative effectiveness rate for the flu shot this year. Sounds like a fair number, but what if the real number was a lousy 1.5%? How many people would vaccinate then? Here’s the scoop on the 60%. Only about 2.7 out of 100 adults on average will get the flu in any given year. If you vaccinate 100 people, the rate of adults contracting the flu drops by 60%. So, instead of 2.7 out of 100 adults getting the flu, only 1.2 of the 100 adults gets the flu. This means that you vaccinate 100 people and a negligible 1.5 people are spared the flu - according to a recent meta-analysis in the Lancet. BUT, 30% of the 100 people vaccinated have an adverse reaction to the vaccine and 6% have life-changing, severe reactions - according to the CDC website. ~ Craig Stellpflug

Ichthus
by Bronze Member on Jan. 31, 2013 at 11:32 AM

I saw that. It's so easy for them to play with the statistical numbers to make things sound EPIDEMIC.


Quoting emmy526:

via fb:

Relative flu numbers or real flu numbers? The CDC is claiming about a 60% relative effectiveness rate for the flu shot this year. Sounds like a fair number, but what if the real number was a lousy 1.5%? How many people would vaccinate then? Here’s the scoop on the 60%. Only about 2.7 out of 100 adults on average will get the flu in any given year. If you vaccinate 100 people, the rate of adults contracting the flu drops by 60%. So, instead of 2.7 out of 100 adults getting the flu, only 1.2 of the 100 adults gets the flu. This means that you vaccinate 100 people and a negligible 1.5 people are spared the flu - according to a recent meta-analysis in the Lancet. BUT, 30% of the 100 people vaccinated have an adverse reaction to the vaccine and 6% have life-changing, severe reactions - according to the CDC website. ~ Craig Stellpflug



jlc91
by Member on Jan. 31, 2013 at 12:15 PM

I have yet another friend who was diagnosed w/ influenza today... who got his flu shot in November! 

MommyO2-6631
by Member on Feb. 1, 2013 at 11:25 AM
My mother was forced to get the flu shot for her job and has had the flu twice already. She works at an elementary school. She's the only person i know that got the shot and the only person i know who has gotten the flu
Posted on the NEW CafeMom Mobile
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)