Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Proposed Texas law calls for allowing vaccination of children without parental consent

Posted by   + Show Post

Proposed Texas law calls for allowing vaccination of children without parental consent

Thursday, March 14, 2013 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer



Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039487_vaccinations_children_parental_consent.html#ixzz2NX4m2B8a

(NaturalNews) If you thought the so-called "great state" of Texas was a bastion of freedom, liberty, and minimal government intrusion, think again. Efforts are currently in the works in the form of two new Senate bills to seize parental sovereignty rights and allow minors living in the Lone Star State to consent to vaccinations.

Senate Bill 63, entitled "Relating to consent to the immunization of certain children," would allow minors to consent to vaccinations without their parents' permission, violating existing Texas statutes that prohibit such action. Sponsored by Senator Jane Nelson, a Republican from Texas' District 12 near Dallas, S.B. 63 is a direct affront to the rights of parents to govern the vaccination choices of their children.

"Claiming a child can consent to receiving these chemicals is the same as claiming a child can consent to having sex or doing drugs," writes Melissa Melton for InfoWars.com about S.B. 63. "Texas statute 22.011 states, 'Sexual assault for anyone to intentionally or knowingly penetrate a person under age 17, other than his spouse,' unless the person is withing three years of age from a child of at least 14; anyone convicted stands to serve between two and 20 years in prison."

Jabbing a vaccine needle into the arm of a child, of course, is technically a form of non-consensual penetration, by definition. So in essence, Sen. Nelson's proposal to allow young children, who happen to be very easily influenced by adults, to consent to potentially deadly vaccines is a type of both sexual and medical assault by the state.

It all conveniently aligns with the United Nations' infamous Declaration of the Rights of the Child, which basically declares that governments have more power over children than children's own parents. Part of this sinister declaration, which is the driving force behind S.B. 63, claims that children can decide for themselves the chemicals they do or do not want injected into their bodies in the name of disease prevention. (http://www.parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={98172987-5D33-4A41-AF04-84F6726222C3})

Corrupt Texas politicians also pushing bill to force daycare workers to be vaccinated

As if this was not disturbing enough, Sen. Nelson, with the help of Democrat cosponsor Sen. Eddie Lucio Jr., has also introduced S.B. 64, entitled "Relating to a policy on vaccine-preventable diseases for licensed child-care facilities." If passed, S.B. 64 would require that all child-care facility workers be vaccinated in accordance with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s current vaccination recommendations, which is the most convoluted in the world.

According to the latest text of S.B. 64, all child-care facilities would be required to establish a vaccination protocol for each worker based on the "level of risk the employee presents to children." Similar to the forced-vaccination policies of many healthcare facilities in the U.S., child-care facilities in Texas would be required to keep a record of each workers' vaccination status, and enforce alternate "protective" measures like wearing masks and gloves at all times for those workers who exempt themselves from the requirement.
(http://www.parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC=)

You can contact Sen. Jane Nelson and express your thoughts about her evil vaccination schemes at:
P.O. Box 12068
Capitol Station
Austin, Texas 78711
(512) 463-0112
fax: (512) 463-0923

1235 S. Main Street, Suite 280
Grapevine, Texas 76051
(817) 424-3446
fax: (817) 488-6648

You can contact Sen. Eddie Lucio Jr. to express your thoughts at:
P.O. Box 12068
Capitol Station
Austin, Texas 78711
(512) 463-0127
fax: (512) 463-0061

7 North Park Plaza
Brownsville, Texas 78521
(956) 548-0227
fax: (956) 548-0440

Also, be sure to check out the work of ParentalRights.org, which is working to block U.N.-backed efforts to eliminate parental sovereignty over children: http://www.parentalrights.org/

Sources for this article include:

http://www.infowars.com

http://openstates.org/tx/bills/83/SB63/

http://openstates.org/tx/bills/83/SB64/

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039487_vaccinations_children_parental_consent.html#ixzz2NX4Yl18c
by on Mar. 14, 2013 at 12:32 PM
Replies (11-17):
emmy526
by New Owner on Mar. 19, 2013 at 12:05 PM

bump

Baby4us09
by Bronze Member on Mar. 19, 2013 at 12:41 PM

Thank you

Quoting emmy526:

ime guesing new york will be next


Quoting GoodyBrook:

Texas:  the next nanny state.  :(




graycalico
by on Mar. 20, 2013 at 8:03 AM
That's insane and scary.
Posted on the NEW CafeMom Mobile
Liz132
by Member on Mar. 20, 2013 at 9:34 AM

 I'm sure none vaxed kids are just going to run out and get vaccinated. I just worry that the kind of pressure that is put on parents who chose not to vaccinate might be put on to children.

secondboy2012
by Member on Mar. 20, 2013 at 9:36 AM
My 13 year old knows and I actually told him about this. He would never consent.

Quoting emmy526:

mine sure do....they've known since they were old enough to comprehend



Quoting kitty8199:

Yeah I'm sure most unvaccinated kids know why they aren't.

Maddie will know why for sure.




Quoting emmy526:

yeah i don't see any reports of Ca kids running to the nurse to get shot up with stuff....if there was an uptick in vaccines at school, and that program was a success, we'd be hearing about it




Quoting kitty8199:

So when a child has a reaction to a vaccine the patents said no to, who's responsible?





But i don't see many kids volunteering for shots.








Posted on the NEW CafeMom Mobile
liliem
by Member on Mar. 20, 2013 at 6:32 PM

I don't think its going to fly. But they keep trying. Its a lot of money so just follow the money. If there is money to be made, they will make it. Either way they usually always have to put in an exemption. But hopefully Texas will fight it! But know knows... isn't that where the government put through the gardisil vaccine? Ugh.. 

starbuck75
by Member on Mar. 21, 2013 at 9:41 AM
1 mom liked this
It doesn't matter whether or not a child has a reaction to a vaccine or not. No one is responsible according to the law. You cannot sue a doctor, nurse, hospital, drug company - and I am sure they will extend this to schools - for vaccine damage or death. There are some "table" damages (such as SIDS and death) that allow you to files with VAERS and have a chance to be hears by the government in vaccine court. This is a kangaroo court run by the government. It is a joke. 5000 families claiming that vaccines caused autism int heir children were lumped together in something called "The Autism Omnibus Proceedings." We filed after our son regressed immediately following vaccination (the have a time limit on filing. This time limit is too narrow for parents to realize the medical ramifications of vaccination, and I think the government even had a hand in naming it "autism" which is wholly misleading. "AUTISM" is a neuro-developmental condition that is diagnosed SOLELY on the observation of certain BEHAVIORS that includes but is not limited to: communication disorders (either loss of speech, no development of language skills or talking after age three; hand flapping, toe-walking, limited or no eye contact, looking at things out the corners of the eyes, irregular or awkward body movements; "stimming" which can be verbal (making nonsensical noises) or visual (staring at something such as the blades of a fan or flickering lights) or other repetitive behaviors (OCD); sensitivity to light, sound, and/or touch; failure to respond to one's name, social impairments,behavioral disorders, cognitive impairments, anxiety and panic disorders, transient catatonia etc.... For a long time it was considered psychiatric or psychological and parents were just referred to these specialists (and often they still do) and the child is just psychotropically medicated into oblivion to make them easier to handle. But the truth is that this form of autism includes a HOST of medical comorbidities that have been for far too long ignored by the mainstream medical community. These medical/neurological problems associated with this disorder may include but are not limited to: Immune dysfunction, serious digestive dysfunctional, inability to breakdown certain proteins, serious debilitating gut pain, lung problems, skin problems (eczema or rashes), chronic infections, chronic fevers, ear problems, auditory processing problems, tremors, nystagmus, seizures, chronic strep, chronic staph infections, chronic cellulitis, gut dysbiosis (leaky gut syndrome), serious inflammatory bowel disease, chronic constipation, mega colon, chronic diarrhea, overgrowth of bad bacteria, overgrowth of bad yeast, inability to regulate copper in the body (can cause permanent damage to the brain and other organs), food allergies, chemical and plant allergies, asthma, deranged mineral transport, repeat fungal infections occurring in various parts of the body(such as in the lungs), PANDAS, serious nerve pain (often occurring in the legs), alopecia, mitochondrial disease and many others. Children often have many of the issues in both the neuro developmental and the medical/neurological issues. all of the above are what parents risks when they vaccinate. Many parents who filed under seizures or any number of medical disorders were compensated by the NVICF while those 5000 children whose parents were told it was "just autism" were made to jump through numerous governmental hoops for years, only to have their claims summarily dismissed by the government without EVER having their evidence heard by the autism court. If these families Google their names, they will find a court document dismissing their claims which states that they failed to prove causation. It's really hard to prove causation when you NEVER even get to present your evidence to anyone. What a JOKE. Only a very few, such as Hannah Poling were ever compensated for autism, but the government had to "save face" so they said she had an underlying "mitochondrial disorder" FIRST and that the vaccines exacerbated this into autism. She will receive around 20 million dollars over the course of her lifetime. After her case, the government sealed all the evidence and took steps to throw all the other cases out without being heard. And now TEXAS wants to manipulate and vaccinate children without the knowledge or consent of the parents? The rates of this form of autism, as described above, has now been upgraded by the CDC to One out of every FIFTY children. this means that the rates in BOYS is now most likely around one in TWENTY. How long shall WE THE PEOPLE stand for this? There are many issues at play here. One of the most vital is the question of parental rights versus the rights of government regarding determining what is in the best interest of children and the other is the issue of medical freedom (to decline any medical procedure for oneself or their children)
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN