Current Events & Hot TopicsCurrent Events & Hot Topics / Current Events & Hot Topics

Keep up with discussion in the "Current Events & Hot Topics" group through your e-mail, or join in the conversation yourself!

Join CafeMom Today (It's free and easy!) Already a member?

Tests find harmful levels of BPA in our industrialized food

Raintree

posted to Current Events & Hot Topics in Current Events & Hot Topics
on Nov. 3, 2009 at 6:51 PM

  • 19 Replies
  • 157 Total Views

Consumer Reports' latest tests of canned foods, including soups, juice, tuna, and green beans, have found that almost all of the 19 name-brand foods tested contain measurable levels of Bisphenol A (BPA). The results are reported in the December 2009 issue and also available online. BPA, which has been used for years in clear plastic bottles and food-can liners, has been restricted in Canada and some U.S. states and municipalities because it has been linked to a wide array of health effects including reproductive abnormalities, heightened risk of breast and prostate cancers, diabetes, and heart disease. I've reported on BPA over at Civil Eats here, here, and here.

Federal guidelines currently put the daily upper limit of safe exposure at 50 micrograms of BPA per kilogram of body weight. But that level is based on a handful of experiments done in the 1980s rather than hundreds of more recent animal and laboratory studies indicating that serious health risks could result from much lower doses of BPA. Several animal studies show adverse effects, such as abnormal reproductive development, at exposures of 2.4 micrograms of BPA per kilogram of body weight per day, a dose that could be reached by a child eating one or a few servings daily or an adult daily diet that includes multiple servings of canned foods containing BPA levels comparable to some of the foods Consumer Reports tested.

In keeping with established practices that ensure an adequate margin of safety for human exposure, Consumer Reports' food-safety scientists recommend limiting daily exposure to BPA to one-thousandth of that level (standard safety limit setting practice), or 0.0024 micrograms per kilogram of body weight, significantly lower than FDA's current safety limit.

For the rest of the article go here


--------


Once again, this highlights the difficulty in choosing truly nutritious and unharmful foods. Reading lables, ingredients lists, etc. will NOT help the consumer to consistently make good choices. This is where personal responsibility is lost- and victimhood becomes the reality.

Thoughts?

Written by on Nov. 3, 2009 at 6:51 PM

Replies:


  • stormcris
  • by on Nov. 3, 2009 at 7:09 PM
  • Maybe tin and glass were not such a bad idea...

  • sweetie00
  • by on Nov. 3, 2009 at 7:11 PM
  • 'this highlights the difficulty in choosing truly nutritious and unharmful foods. Reading lables, ingredients lists, etc. will NOT help the consumer to consistently make good choices. This is where personal responsibility is lost- and victimhood becomes the reality.'

    'Several animal studies show adverse effects, such as abnormal reproductive development,...'

     

  • tericared
  • by on Nov. 3, 2009 at 7:13 PM

  • Quoting stormcris:

    Maybe tin and glass were not such a bad idea...

    darn think you are doing good by drinking healthy water in the plastic bottles...

  • Raintree
  • by on Nov. 3, 2009 at 8:30 PM
  •  Bump.

  • Talee
  • by on Nov. 3, 2009 at 8:50 PM
  • Lovely...I usually by frozen veggies, how about the plastics they are contained in?

    Also...those steamables in the plastic wrappers...what about those? I have kind of steered clear of those, just doesnt sound right to me.

    Ugh...and to think of all the ramen bowls I used to heat up in those styrofoam containers when i was younger....blahhhhh

    Time to get a cast iron skillet and slaughter my own animals and can my own food...geesh!

  • rozepyle
  • by on Nov. 3, 2009 at 9:07 PM
  • this is why i want to be self sufficient. there are so many things i already make at home so i do avoid a lot of those but its scary still :(

  • behappilyever
  • by on Nov. 3, 2009 at 9:16 PM
  • good grief, is there anything healthy that i can feed my family without poisoning them or breaking the bank? i've been on a health streak since i got pregnant, only to find out that the food i'm eating is healthier, but still contains all the crap that the bad stuff does. i can't win! not without buying a house in the country, growing all my food, killing and processing all my meat, etc etc and who has the money for that? its so disheartening, it makes me want to say eff it and go back to eating all the crap from before! i may be fat, unhealthy, and die sooner, but at least i would expect it and be jolly while doing so....

  • Raintree
  • by on Nov. 3, 2009 at 9:49 PM
  • Okay, I'm gonna throw out some ideas for those of you that are freaking out right now about what to buy. And I'm gonna come at it from three angles- affordable, sustainable, healthful. 

    First of all, find a CSA (community supported agriculture)in your area- shop around, some have better deals than others. These usually have a subscription that you can pick up weekly which consists of a box of fresh vegetables in season. You can often save money on fresh produce by simply buying those things that are currently in season. If they're also local- even better. You can often purchase meat from local farmers as well. But you should probably consider having a freezer handy.

    If you have the space, consider growing some of your own.

    Eat a diet rich in plant based foods- lots of WHOLE grains- and buy these in from a store that has a bulk option- this is often a big money-saver that some people don't even think about. For instance, you can buy a 2 pound box of conventional oatmeal at my local supermarket for about $2.39. I can get the same amount from the bulk bin for about $1.50. 

    Look around your area for asian markets, or indian markets. These often have locally grown produce at better cost. And they often have great deals in terms of bulk rice, spices, etc.

    We are a family of six, and I typically spend about $400 a month on groceries- There are months, though when I spend far less- especially during our growing season- we do have a large yard.

    And please- pressure your bought and paid for congressional representatives and senators to DO something about this madness. The only thing we can do is refuse to buy the stuff. Keep in mind that this particular study found this chemical primarily in heavily processed foods.

  • Grannygoli
  • by on Nov. 3, 2009 at 10:37 PM
  • Thanks so much Raintree.  Good thing is that we hardly ever eat canned foods but now i know that even the organic canned food that I sometimes buy could have it.  Oh well, we won't be missing much not buying canned beans for emergency situations.

    As for plastic, we stay away from that as much as possible.

  • Mergath
  • by on Nov. 3, 2009 at 11:52 PM
  • All I have to say is AAAAARRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHHHH.

    We just can't win.

    Great suggestions, Raintree.  I wish I could afford a subscription to one of those food coop things, but from what I've seen we only have one around here and you have to pay a huge lump sum.  Argh.  

    Guess I'll just keep on doing the best that I can.  No more canned green beans for awhile.

    Lilypie Second Birthday tickers


Only group members can reply to this post.

Join Group


© 2009 CMI Marketing, Inc. All rights reserved.