Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

A new Christmas Tree Tax...WTH?

Posted by on Nov. 9, 2011 at 9:11 AM
  • 57 Replies

...to support a new Federal program to improve the image and marketing of Christmas trees.

In the Federal Register of November 8, 2011, Acting Administrator of Agricultural Marketing David R. Shipman announced that the Secretary of Agriculture will appoint a Christmas Tree Promotion Board.  The purpose of the Board is to run a “program of promotion, research, evaluation, and information designed to strengthen the Christmas tree industry’s position in the marketplace; maintain and expend existing markets for Christmas trees; and to carry out programs, plans, and projects designed to provide maximum benefits to the Christmas tree industry” (7 CFR 1214.46(n)).  And the program of “information” is to include efforts to “enhance the image of Christmas trees and the Christmas tree industry in the United States” (7 CFR 1214.10).

To pay for the new Federal Christmas tree image improvement and marketing program, the Department of Agriculture imposed a 15-cent fee on all sales of fresh Christmas trees by sellers of more than 500 trees per year (7 CFR 1214.52).  And, of course, the Christmas tree sellers are free to pass along the 15-cent Federal fee to consumers who buy their Christmas trees.

Acting Administrator Shipman had the temerity to say the 15-cent mandatory Christmas tree fee “is not a tax nor does it yield revenue for the Federal government” (76 CFR 69102).  The Federal government mandates that the Christmas tree sellers pay the 15-cents per tree, whether they want to or not.  The Federal government directs that the revenue generated by the 15-cent fee goes to the Board appointed by the Secretary of Agriculture to carry out the Christmas tree program established by the Secretary of Agriculture.  Mr. President, that’s a new 15-cent tax to pay for a Federal program to improve the image and marketing of Christmas trees.

Nobody is saying President Obama doesn’t have authority to impose his new Christmas Tree Tax — his Administration cites the Commodity Promotion, Research and Information Act of 1996.  Just because the Obama Administration has the legal power to impose its Christmas Tree Tax doesn’t mean it should do so.

The economy is barely growing and nine percent of the American people have no jobs.  Is a new tax on Christmas trees the best President Obama can do?

And, by the way, the American Christmas tree has a great image that doesn’t need any help from the government.

http://blog.heritage.org/2011/11/08/obama-couldnt-wait-his-new-christmas-tree-tax/

By passing useless legislation like this, Congress should get a clue why they have a low approval rating.

by on Nov. 9, 2011 at 9:11 AM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
stormcris
by Christy on Nov. 9, 2011 at 9:13 AM

Well I guess we are seeing how they are creating jobs.

_Bama_
by on Nov. 9, 2011 at 9:17 AM

Damn they got get theirs wherever they can.....

rotPferd
by Silver Member on Nov. 9, 2011 at 9:17 AM
1 mom liked this

 I paid sales tax on a fake tree so whats the big deal? And it was a heck of alot more than 15 cents!

BleedinHeartMom
by on Nov. 9, 2011 at 9:18 AM
2 moms liked this

Oh noes...its the war on christmas trees. we buy artificial anyway, enough tress get destroyed as it is..

samurai_chica
by Bronze Member on Nov. 9, 2011 at 9:18 AM

I really don't think it's that big of a deal. It's only 15 extra cents a year.

rocketracer
by Silver Member on Nov. 9, 2011 at 9:20 AM
5 moms liked this

The amount of the tax really isn't the big deal.  Congress thinking they needed to create a gov't program to help the image of a Christmas tree is what is really ridiculous. 

samurai_chica
by Bronze Member on Nov. 9, 2011 at 9:21 AM

What harm could it do if it helps the Christmas tree Industry promote themselves? The Christmas tree industry has declined over the years...they probably need it.

rocketracer
by Silver Member on Nov. 9, 2011 at 9:23 AM
2 moms liked this


Quoting BleedinHeartMom:

Oh noes...its the war on christmas trees. we buy artificial anyway, enough tress get destroyed as it is..


Not a war on the Christmas tree.  Creating a gov't program to improve the image of a Christmas is what is truly stupid.  

stormcris
by Christy on Nov. 9, 2011 at 9:23 AM

Do people not have to pay sales tax on real trees in your area? 

Quoting rotPferd:

 I paid sales tax on a fake tree so whats the big deal? And it was a heck of alot more than 15 cents!


Fear of serious injury alone cannot justify oppression of free speech and assembly. Men feared witches and burnt women. It is the function of speech to free men from the bondage of irrational fears.
Louis D. Brandeis
LauraKW
by "Dude!" on Nov. 9, 2011 at 9:33 AM
1 mom liked this
Why is this Obama's fault when you clearly understand Congress created this legislation?

Quoting rocketracer:

The amount of the tax really isn't the big deal.  Congress thinking they needed to create a gov't program to help the image of a Christmas tree is what is really ridiculous. 

Posted on CafeMom Mobile
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)