Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Current Events & Hot Topics Current Events & Hot Topics

9 Lies Republicans Tell About Women's Bodies

Posted by   + Show Post

9 Lies Republicans Tell About Women's Bodies


Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) apologized Tuesday to Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) for accusing her of lying about the gender breakdown of a contraception hearing panel, but plenty of real lies remain in the debate over women's health. Some are promoted by Republican lawmakers as they push legislation that limits reproductive rights, and others come from GOP presidential candidates and their surrogates.

1. Birth Control Causes Prostate Cancer.

Last month a New Hampshire lawmaker came up with a new reason the government should not require health insurance companies to provide contraception.

"As a man, would it interest you to know that Dr. Brownstein just published an article that links the pill to prostate cancer?” state Rep. Jeanine Notter (R) asked a male representative at the hearing, the Merrimack Patch reports.

"In the children that are born from these women?" he asked. Notter could not clearly explain the study or how the pill results in prostate cancer.

The study described in the newsletter of Dr. David Brownstein, a physician and holistic practitioner in Michigan, suggests men may ingest estrogen through environmental contamination, not in utero from mothers taking birth control. An author of the study told ABC News, "This is just a hypothesis-generating idea. Women should not be throwing away the pill because of this."

2. Abortion Causes Breast Cancer.

The New Hampshire House recently passed a bill that would require doctors to tell women seeking abortions that the procedure can cause breast cancer. Here is an excerpt from the bill, sponsored by Notter:

Materials that inform the pregnant woman that there is a direct link between abortion and breast cancer. It is scientifically undisputed that full-term pregnancy reduces a woman’s lifetime risk of breast cancer. It is also undisputed that the earlier a woman has a first full-term pregnancy, the lower her risk of breast cancer becomes, because following a full-term pregnancy the breast tissue exposed to estrogen through the menstrual cycle is more mature and cancer resistant. In fact, for each year that a woman’s first full-term pregnancy is delayed, her risk of breast cancer rises 3.5 percent. The theory that there is a direct link between abortion and breast cancer builds upon this undisputed foundation. During the first and second trimesters of pregnancy the breasts develop merely by duplicating immature tissues. Once a woman passes the thirty-second week of pregnancy (third trimester), the immature cells develop into mature cancer resistant cells. When an abortion ends a normal pregnancy, the woman is left with more immature breast tissue than she had before she was pregnant.

There is no link between abortions and breast cancer, according to the World Health Organization, the American Cancer Society and other major health organizations. Similar provisions requiring doctors to make the abortion-breast cancer connection remain on the books in other state laws. Alaska, Kansas, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Texas all inaccurately assert a risk in written counseling materials, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a New York-based reproductive health research organization.

3. Birth Control Is A Sex Pill.

Rush Limbaugh showed he has no understanding of how birth control pills work when he attacked Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown law student barred from testifying as a Democratic witness at a congressional hearing about the Obama administration's contraception policy. Limbaugh called Fluke a “slut” for needing lots of birth control to manage her sex life.

“She wants to be paid to have sex,” Limbaugh said. “She's having so much sex she can't afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex.”

Rick Santorum has also said that contraception encourages a bad kind of sex. Last year, in an interview with the Evangelical blog Caffeinated Thoughts, Santorum warned of the "dangers of contraception:"

"It’s not OK because it’s a license to do things in the sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be. They’re supposed to be within marriage, they are supposed to be for purposes that are, yes, conjugal, but also [inaudible], but also procreative. That’s the perfect way that a sexual union should happen. We take any part of that out, we diminish the act."

Most women who have had sex have used contraception. Birth control pills -- which are taken daily, regardless of how frequently a woman has sex -- may also be taken to manage endometriosis, ovarian cysts, acne or other health problems. A recent bill in Arizona proposed penalizing women who use the pill for non-medical reasons.

4. Abortion Industry Is “Selling Abortions.”

A Republican state legislator in Arizona last week wrote in an email to a constituent that she wanted to force women seeking abortions to watch the procedure first.

"Personally I'd like to make a law that mandates a woman watch an abortion being performed prior to having a 'surgical procedure,'" state Rep. Terri Proud (R) wrote. The constituent responded by email that she was "speechless" and after a baffling exchange with Proud, released the emails to the media. Facing national outrage, Proud issued a statement:

For too long, Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry have placed selling abortions above the health and safety of women. My message to a constituent last week emphasized my concerns with how abortion providers have not been honest with women about the realities of abortion, and the short and long-term risks of this dangerous surgical procedure.

The notion that Planned Parenthood baits women into unwanted pregnancies by providing ineffective contraception then profits off the abortions is nothing new, but it's as outrageous as it sounds. Abortions constitute 3 percent of Planned Parenthood's services, and the organization estimates it prevents more than 220,000 abortions each year by providing contraception. Because Planned Parenthood is not allowed to use federal funds for abortions, defunding the program may limit contraception services and result in more abortions.

5. Women Can't Get Pregnant From Rape.

Just before Idaho's Senate passed a mandatory ultrasound bill last week, bill sponsor made some startling comments about abortion and rape.

"Rape and incest was used as a reason to oppose this," said state Sen. Chuck Winder (R). "I would hope that when a woman goes in to a physician with a rape issue, that physician will indeed ask her about perhaps her marriage, was this pregnancy caused by normal relations in a marriage or was it truly caused by a rape. I assume that's part of the counseling that goes on.”

It wasn't the first time a lawmaker has suggested that women seeking abortions may lie about rape. Some anti-abortion activists actually believe that rape cannot result in pregnancy. Buzzfeed dug up a series of bizarre statements Republicans have made about pregnancy, rape, juices not flowing and more. Here's one:

The odds that a woman who is raped will get pregnant are "one in millions and millions and millions," said state Rep. Stephen Freind, R-Delaware County, the Legislature's leading abortion foe.

The reason, Freind said, is that the traumatic experience of rape causes a woman to "secrete a certain secretion" that tends to kill sperm.

Two Philadelphia doctors specializing in human reproduction characterized Freind's contention as scientifically baseless.

According to Planned Parenthood, about 5 percent of rapes result in pregnancy, and providing all rape victims with emergency contraception could prevent more than 22,000 unwanted pregnancies a year.

6. Prenatal Testing Leads To Abortion.

Rick Santorum made prenatal testing a campaign issue last month when he declared the tests are designed to "cull the ranks of the disabled in our society" by encouraging abortions.

“Amniocentesis does, in fact, result more often than not in this country in abortions,” Santorum, who has a severely disabled daughter, said on Face the Nation. “That is a fact.”

In fact, more than 90 percent of amniocenteses tests result in normal diagnoses, and half of fetuses diagnosed with severe abnormalities -- about 5 percent of those tested -- are aborted, according to PolitiFact.

A campaign spokeswoman for Obama condemned Santorum's comments as "misinformed and dangerous" and pointed out that the tests help women have safer deliveries and healthier babies.

7. HPV Vaccine Causes Retardation.

Back when Rick Perry was campaigning for president, his rivals attacked him for signing an executive order mandating the human papillomavirus vaccine for young girls, and misinformation quickly spread. Michele Bachmann insinuated that the vaccine causes mental retardation, while Santorum spoke out against "having little girls inoculated at the force and compulsion of the government."

The vaccine is safe and effective in preventing cervical cancer caused by certain strains of HPV, and Perry's 2007 executive order, which was overturned by the state legislature, would have allowed parents to opt out of having their daughters vaccinated. Dr. Renata Arrington-Sanders, a professor at Johns Hopkins University medical school, told HuffPost's Laura Bassett:

"The HPV vaccine has been shown to be safe and well-tolerated based on multiple medical reports that have been submitted through government databases. It's unfortunate that this particular vaccine is surrounded by a lot of controversy just because it's been labeled as an STD-prevention vaccine. We have similar vaccines, such as one for hepatitis B, that are also used in a mandated approach and have shown very successful rates with prevention."

8. Plan B Causes Abortions.

The debate over the Obama administration's contraception policy has yielded some puzzling claims about birth control and Plan B. House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) addressed the House in February, urging his colleagues to reverse Obama's mandate for health insurance coverage of "abortion-inducing drugs:"

In recent days, Americans of every faith and political persuasion have mobilized in objection to a rule put forward by the Obama administration that constitutes an unambiguous attack on religious freedom in our country. This rule would require faith-based employers –- including Catholic charities, schools, universities, and hospitals -– to provide services they believe are immoral. Those services include sterilization, abortion-inducing drugs and devices, and contraception.

Michele Bachmann called Plan B an abortion pill when she incorrectly criticized Obama for making the drug available over-the-counter -- an FDA recommendation the administration and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius rejected last year. "The president can put abortion pills for girls 8 years of age, 11 years of age, on the bubblegum aisle," Bachmann said at a "pro-life" town hall in December.

Contraceptives, emergency or not, prevent pregnancy. They don't cause abortions. Plan B works in the same way and with the same ingredients as birth control pills, just at a higher dosage, and does nothing to stop the development of a fetus.

9. Your Fetus Is Just Fine.

The Arizona Senate passed a bill this month to protect doctors from "wrongful birth" lawsuits -- effectively allowing them to withhold information that may lead a patient to get an abortion. HuffPost's John Celock reports:

Sen. Nancy Barto (R-Phoenix) told the Claims Journal that she sponsored the law because she did not want claimants to blame a doctor for a baby born with disabilities. Under the provisions of her bill, a doctor could not be sued for medical malpractice if the doctor withholds information from a mother about a child's potential health issues that could influence her decision to have an abortion. In addition, a lawsuit could not be filed on the child's behalf regarding a disability.

Kansas lawmakers have considered similar legislation.

by on Mar. 30, 2012 at 9:44 AM
Replies (21-30):
mommyto2gr8ones
by Member on Mar. 30, 2012 at 12:37 PM

 I did, and I thought I responded accordingly.  :)

Quoting futureshock:

 

Did you actually read the explanations under each example?

 

mommyto2gr8ones
by Member on Mar. 30, 2012 at 12:41 PM

 I don't feel I am ignoring the real reason for the lawsuit.  Also, I agree with the premise that doctors should not be sued for a birth defect and that a lawsuit makes sense if they withheld info, I said in my original response that I wouldn't want a doc withholding info from me since I do pay them to do their job and not anything else.  :)

Quoting jillianmayasmom:

Please do not ignore the real reason for the lawsuit.

Doctors should not be sued because a child has a birth defect. They sure as hell should be sued if they do not inform the parents of the birth defects when and if they become aware of them.

 

LovemyQ
by Bronze Member on Mar. 30, 2012 at 12:47 PM
1 mom liked this

I wanted to post some info from one of the links you have. It is exactly how the Plan B pill works. It is important for ladies to read so we can know if it goes against our beliefs or not.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) defines conception (and therefore pregnancy) as beginning at the moment of implantation. "Conception is implantation," says ACOG, and therefore EC cannot, by definition, cause an abortion—even if it affects a fertilized egg. But, as Karen Brauer of Pharmacists for Life International told CT, "Our issue has to do with human life, not their definition of pregnancy." In her view, human life begins the moment that an egg is fertilized.

This difference in emphasis is crucial. According to its maker, Plan B "prevents pregnancy mainly by stopping the release of an egg from the ovary and may also prevent the fertilization of an egg. Plan B may also work by preventing it from attaching to the uterus." Though EC will do nothing to stop the growth of a developing fetus, it has the potential to prevent a fertilized egg from implanting in the uterine wall. To many pro-life pharmacists, this makes it an abortion-inducing drug, and its presence in the neighborhood pharmacy has caused them to fight for their right not to dispense it.


mommyto2gr8ones
by Member on Mar. 30, 2012 at 12:49 PM

 I agree, they shouldn't be allowed to withhold information, I just said it doesn't surprise me that they are doing that to avoid lawsuits in the future.

I never said anything about how I feel regarding abortion.  I'm not trying to make someone else's decision for them.  I do believe that the statement that prenatal testing leads to abortion is a "lie" doesn't sit right with me.  If ANY abortions come from the results of prenatal testing then I can see how that is seen to be a truth.  I know not all women abort their baby b/c of testing results but some do and I don't understand why they fully rely on the testing results to tell them if there is something wrong with the baby, obviously testing can be flawed.  I wonder how many women have been told the test results said one thing, decided to have their babies, only to find out the baby was fine.

Quoting GLWerth:

Would it be OK to tell someone they didn't have cancer, if the tests showed they did? Doctors have an obligation to be truthful with their patients.

Finally, why can't we let each woman make her own reproductive decisions? Why should I butt in on your very personal and private decisions? Why should you make those same decisions for me?

Quoting mommyto2gr8ones:

 6. Prenatal Testing Leads To Abortion.

Is everyone ignoring the most recent law suit in the news where a family stood in a court room and testified that they would have aborted had they of known their little girl had down syndrome???  Am I the only one baffled by this "lie"???

9. Your Fetus Is Just Fine.

I can't say I blame them for this one after the lawsuit I mentioned above.  How is it the doctor's fault again when the child has a birth defect???  IMO they really shouldn't be allowed to withhold info if I'm paying them to do their job but this is a "contract" society so it doesn't surprise me that they want to avoid any more doctors getting sued b/c someone's child has a birth defect.

 

 

Momniscient
by Ruby Member on Mar. 30, 2012 at 12:50 PM

This


Quoting GLWerth:

It is their right to abort if that is their choice. As to the lawsuit, I don't agree with that as the solution, but I wasn't involved and it wasn't my decision.

Since my own loss, I've met and become friends with many women who have lost children. I've known women who have agonized over the decision to keep or abort fetuses with a variety of genetic problems, including Downs. It was not easy or taken lightly, but some chose to continue, some chose to abort. For each, they chose what was best for their family in the situation at the time.

However, prenatal testing does not, as Republicans would have us believe, inevitably lead to abortion. It does, however, lead to having a plan in place for babies born with problems that need to be dealt with soon after birth.

Yes, some families will decide abortion is the right answer for them. Others won't. That is why it is called choice.

Lying to parents about the results of testing is simply medical malpractice, even if it is now legally sanctioned in Arizona.

Would it be OK to tell someone they didn't have cancer, if the tests showed they did? Doctors have an obligation to be truthful with their patients.

Finally, why can't we let each woman make her own reproductive decisions? Why should I butt in on your very personal and private decisions? Why should you make those same decisions for me?

Quoting mommyto2gr8ones:

 6. Prenatal Testing Leads To Abortion.

Is everyone ignoring the most recent law suit in the news where a family stood in a court room and testified that they would have aborted had they of known their little girl had down syndrome???  Am I the only one baffled by this "lie"???

9. Your Fetus Is Just Fine.

I can't say I blame them for this one after the lawsuit I mentioned above.  How is it the doctor's fault again when the child has a birth defect???  IMO they really shouldn't be allowed to withhold info if I'm paying them to do their job but this is a "contract" society so it doesn't surprise me that they want to avoid any more doctors getting sued b/c someone's child has a birth defect.




jewels5525
by Gold Member on Mar. 30, 2012 at 12:51 PM

Not so funny though when those "idiots" are being elected into positions to actually pass laws that affect our health.


Quoting NutHouseMomma:

Well, I guess if you are that much of an idiot to just believe whatever anyone puts out there without doing some leg-work and research of your own.....then I guess you deserve to be lumped as a moron. However, I think it's awesome that people can just make up random shit and people believe it and jump on the bandwagon. Way to think for yourself! Ahaahahahahha!


The rights I take for granted are only valid if I fight to give those same rights to others.

-Michael Skolnik-

GLWerth
by Gina on Mar. 30, 2012 at 2:23 PM
1 mom liked this

OK. I apologize for jumping all over you!

I understand what you were saying.

Though I still stand by everything I said. :)

Oh, on testing....triple screen test (or is it quad now) and ultrasound can give an idea of problems, but have a tendency to false positives. The only way to be truly sure is an amnio, which has its own set of associated risks.

But, if you want to be sure, it is the way to go.


Quoting mommyto2gr8ones:

 I agree, they shouldn't be allowed to withhold information, I just said it doesn't surprise me that they are doing that to avoid lawsuits in the future.

I never said anything about how I feel regarding abortion.  I'm not trying to make someone else's decision for them.  I do believe that the statement that prenatal testing leads to abortion is a "lie" doesn't sit right with me.  If ANY abortions come from the results of prenatal testing then I can see how that is seen to be a truth.  I know not all women abort their baby b/c of testing results but some do and I don't understand why they fully rely on the testing results to tell them if there is something wrong with the baby, obviously testing can be flawed.  I wonder how many women have been told the test results said one thing, decided to have their babies, only to find out the baby was fine.

Quoting GLWerth:

 

Would it be OK to tell someone they didn't have cancer, if the tests showed they did? Doctors have an obligation to be truthful with their patients.

Finally, why can't we let each woman make her own reproductive decisions? Why should I butt in on your very personal and private decisions? Why should you make those same decisions for me?

Quoting mommyto2gr8ones:

 6. Prenatal Testing Leads To Abortion.

Is everyone ignoring the most recent law suit in the news where a family stood in a court room and testified that they would have aborted had they of known their little girl had down syndrome???  Am I the only one baffled by this "lie"???

9. Your Fetus Is Just Fine.

I can't say I blame them for this one after the lawsuit I mentioned above.  How is it the doctor's fault again when the child has a birth defect???  IMO they really shouldn't be allowed to withhold info if I'm paying them to do their jobbut this is a "contract" society so it doesn't surprise me that they want to avoid any more doctors getting sued b/c someone's child has a birth defect.

 

 


kailu1835
by Ruby Member on Mar. 30, 2012 at 3:09 PM

 Some of these are true, some are not.  For instance, number 5 is not backed up by the accompanying text.  Number 7 is completely false, and has caused brain damage resulting in retardation of brain development, along with seizures and death at a rate 4 times higher than similar vaccines.  It is not a safe vaccine.  My pediatrician doesn't even carry it, and won't until more long-term studies have been done (which there have been none of up to this point so there is no way to tell the safety of the vaccine long term.  Look up Sons and Daughters of DES and then tell me a fast-tracked, non-placebo controlled studied vaccine is perfectly safe).

Number 9 is BLATANTLY false, because it does not give doctors license to purposefully withhold information about a patient's pregnancy.  It prevents people from being able to sue for something that was honestly missed during pregnancy.  Sometimes babies are born with problems that were not seen during the pregnancy, and people can sue for natural occurances that nobody could have possibly foreseen.  It does not mean that a test showing a problem can be withheld from the patient.

jewels5525
by Gold Member on Mar. 30, 2012 at 6:36 PM

They are all false.  Number 5 gives reasons underneath why it is a lie.

Quoting kailu1835:

 Some of these are true, some are not.  For instance, number 5 is not backed up by the accompanying text.  Number 7 is completely false, and has caused brain damage resulting in retardation of brain development, along with seizures and death at a rate 4 times higher than similar vaccines.  It is not a safe vaccine.  My pediatrician doesn't even carry it, and won't until more long-term studies have been done (which there have been none of up to this point so there is no way to tell the safety of the vaccine long term.  Look up Sons and Daughters of DES and then tell me a fast-tracked, non-placebo controlled studied vaccine is perfectly safe).

Number 9 is BLATANTLY false, because it does not give doctors license to purposefully withhold information about a patient's pregnancy.  It prevents people from being able to sue for something that was honestly missed during pregnancy.  Sometimes babies are born with problems that were not seen during the pregnancy, and people can sue for natural occurances that nobody could have possibly foreseen.  It does not mean that a test showing a problem can be withheld from the patient.


helema24
by Member on Mar. 30, 2012 at 7:48 PM

ok how can  BC cause prostate cancer in unborn babies or cause it latter on in those born to women that too BC when they dont take it during pregnacy? and by the time women hit the stage that things pass on to the baby the meds are out of their system. also BC does not promote sex i knew a large group o fgirl sin HS takeing it fo rvarious reasons rangeing from period regulation to acne problems. and plna b does not terminate a pregnacy it prevents implantation of the egg if it actually was fertilised and there are a huge amount of "arousal while attacked" cases in rape cases across the us for both male and female victims. as for the rest id just love to smack a few politicians...... 

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)