Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Obama Campaign: Women Are Helpless

Posted by   + Show Post

Obama Campaign: Women Are Helpless


Print ArticleSend a Tip
16 hours ago153post a comment

Today, the Obama campaigned launched its Dads Are Unnecessary, Single Women Are Helpless campaign, simply titled "Julia." It features a faceless composite, which seems to be the type of woman with which the campaign is most comfortable.

Under the Obama administration, federal financial support for elective infant death as a form of birth control is increased, meaning that Julia would never have been born. The end.

It wouldn't be any fun to end the article right there, so we'll just say that under President Obama, Julia's parents are apparently nonexistent and the government enrolls her in a proven failed program. She needs to figure something out because she is born into a $16k share of our national debt.

For some reason, Barack Obama is starting his third term as President.

The idea of working hard in school to qualify for college scholarships escapes Julia; the government is needed to get her through college and cover the astronomically high prices. Apparently, the Obama administration lacks the confidence in women to apply themselves and achieve academic success without its helping hand. That's OK--women are losing confidence in Obama, too.

Julia will graduate with record-high debt under President Obama, who is still president.

What "surgery" did College Julia undergo? Perhaps a cancerous baby that had to be removed. Under the Obama administration, self-respect and personal responsibility are unnecessary when the federal government saps resources from the private sector to clean up your messes. Julia can be a professional student and study web design for a frillion years so she can build flash-heavy websites.

Julia is unable to get a job, apparently, so we must redefine the term "child" as a period lasting until her mid-twenties. It's offensive that the Obama administration thinks women are unable to work and get a college education simultaneously.

WTF? Barack Obama is still president.

Julia starts her "career as a web designer." With five-figures of college debt.

I don't know who would elect to go into that amount of debt over a skill that many people learn practically and can learn anywhere; why going to community colleges or trade schools is so reviled by leftists is a mystery. It's the white T-shirt analogy: some people are fine with getting a white, V-neck T at Target for $12; some have to go to Urban Outfitters or J Crew to get the exact same v-neck t-shirt because of the label. It's not a better shirt, the V isn't any deeper, it's all about image.

Annnd Obama is still president. And still fibbing on Romney's Ledbetter stance (sexist legislation, but I digress).

Under the Obama administration, only one in two college graduates can get a job and there doesn't look to be relief any time soon: the President is keeping interest rates low on loans by sacking job creators with the bill.

Julia made the choice to enjoy frozen interest rates and thus chose to limit her employment opportunities because potential employers had to use their capital to pay off her loans as opposed to hiring her. That's how choice works, it's how cause and effect works. Choices have consequences.

Barack Obama is apparently Dictator of the United States as he's been president since 27-year-old Julia was three years old.

Under the Obama administration, insurance premiums are increased across the board for everyone since Julia suffers from some unknown medical condition which prevents her from walking to Target, Costco, or a non-Planned Parenthood clinic to get birth control for as low as $9 per month.

Julia likely protested for increased government regulation and control via Obamacare, which means that if the government wants to mandate ultrasounds prior to getting an abortion, it can, to determine cost-effectiveness.

Julia decides to have a child. She doesn't need a father or husband because she has the Obama government! Fathers are unimportant in both the choice of procreation and the raising of children. Under Obamacare, Julia will have less access due to rationing and higher costs.

Also, apparently Joe Biden was right and Mitt Romney was a senator without anyone knowing, thus the "Romney/Ryan" budget.

Obamacare's structure requires men working alongside Julia to pay higher premiums regardless whether or not their anatomical structure allows them to conceive and bear children by choice themselves. Individuals are not allowed to opt out, like members of Congress. Men who had no role in Julia's personal choice are responsible for shouldering the financial responsibility for that choice by paying more so she can pay less. That's not sexist at all.

Obama is still president and now Julia's son Zachary is starting school? Where is Zachary's dad?

The government is his daddy.

Unfortunately for Julia, the phantom tax cut from the Obama administration has been eaten up by the higher taxes she must pay in order to keep the rates on student interest loans frozen at an artificial level. Because small business owners like herself are targeted by the administration (and Dodd-Frank impedes business growth), Julia is unable to spare any more capital to pay higher wages, create more jobs, or buy the necessities her business needs to grow. The President later lectures her and other job creators during the State of the Union address about how selfish they are to refuse to create jobs.

She must keep going because her son Zachary, though an able-bodied adult, is only 25 years old, just a baby by Obama standards, thus still on Julia's insurance.

Julie tries to enroll in Medicare, but unfortunately President Obama didn't heed the warnings all those years ago that Medicare was broke. Her savings were depleted in last-ditch efforts to save her business after excessive taxation ate up profits. Any remaining funds must be used to supplement what Medicare cannot pay.

Barack Obama is apparently immortal and ALSO still president. Even if his first year of presidency began when Julia was three years-old, this would make him 114 years old at this time.

Julia would love to retire and collect social security, but sadly when retirees went to collect their benefits and opened up their trusty lockboxes, all they found were IOUs.


Julia would love to volunteer at the community garden, but cannot afford to and thus, in her twilight years, must juggle two jobs, one as a concession worker at the local movie theater and another as a greeter at Walmart. She's lucky to find any help at all considering how women have been steadily losing jobs under Barack Obama for years.

Her son, Zachary, is of no help: he was taught that he didn't really have to work for anything all his life because President Obama and his wonderful government would be there to care for him every step of the way. So now when Julia needs help, Zachary is unable, as he still requires help himself.

As a woman, the idea that I can't accomplish anything in life unless a male in government plans it out for me is offensive. It's amazing to me how progressives reject the oversight of the Divine and the gift of free will but embrace the oppressive oversight of flawed men who reject free will. Men, too, should be offended at their lack of representation in the life of Julia--the white, faceless female stereotype that the Obama administration sees as the average female voter.

by on May. 4, 2012 at 10:19 AM
Replies (31-40):
by Ashley on May. 4, 2012 at 12:52 PM

Quoting Tangie1118:

I'm understanding from this post, that you don't like Obama.  But, this post also tells me, that you must never have gone without educational opportunities, healthcare, or scholarships through out your life thus far.  Must be nice. 

by Silver Member on May. 4, 2012 at 12:59 PM
4 moms liked this

I get that this was supposed to make Obama look bad ... but it just ... doesn't.  Total Fail.


by Silver Member on May. 4, 2012 at 1:02 PM

? Who will you vote for? Obama or Romney?

Quoting TruthSeeker.:


Quoting mom2klca:

Who will you vote for in November?

Quoting TruthSeeker.:


Quoting stormcris:

I don't want either of them.




by Silver Member on May. 4, 2012 at 1:05 PM
3 moms liked this

Mamas, don’t let your babies grow up to be “Julia”

By Michelle Malkin  •  May 4, 2012 09:27 AM

I told my 11-year-old daughter about “Julia.” She had one word: “Creepy.” I’m doing my job right.

Notice, by the way, how “progressive” women are awfully quiet about the patriarchal hegemony symbolized by Obama’s faceless, dependent Julia. Cue the crickets: Chirp, chirp, chirp.


Mamas, don’t let your babies grow up to be “Julia”

by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2012

Quick, hide under the covers. The nation’s storyteller, Barack Obama, unveiled a frightening new fable on the Internet intended to scare women away from supporting fiscal conservatives in November. But as is increasingly common with Obama’s social media propaganda initiatives, “The Life of Julia” immediately flopped.

Why? Because 1) self-sufficient women voters aren’t as sheeple-ish as Democratic strategists make them out to be, 2) conservative activists are overtaking Obama’s zombie army online, 3) non-delusional Americans don’t want cradle-to-grave utopians turning their country into the next Greece or Spain, and 4) responsible grownups are getting sick and tired of radical Saul Alinsky-style tall tales from the progressive Pied Piper.

Using snazzy graphics and interactive slideshow features, spins a glowing narrative of imaginary Julia’s life from age 3 to 67. But “Julia” is a pathetic figment of the progressive imagination. She simply cannot function without the lifelong intervention of federal patriarchs.

Instead of two parents preparing her for school, Obama credits Head Start bureaucrats with ensuring that Julia is “ready to learn and succeed” in kindergarten.

Instead of individual teachers, private mentors, home-school organizers or charter school leaders, Obama extols his federal Race to the Top program for implementing the high school “classes she needs to do well” in college.

Instead of thrift-minded families who save for their own kids’ higher educations (or who opt for non-college alternatives) and who encourage those kids to work in private-sector summer jobs, Obama praises his “opportunity tax credit” and Pell Grants for putting Julia through college.

Instead of acknowledging how costly Obamacare mandates have caused individual-market health care insurers to drop plans altogether, Obama promotes the government-manufactured umbilical cord tethering “children” like Julia to their parents’ health care plans until age 26.

Instead of accepting that the costs and consequences of a woman’s sexual choices should be a matter of personal responsibility, Big Daddy Obama heralds his religious liberty-crushing birth control/abortion mandate for allowing Julia to “focus on her work instead of worrying about her health.”

Despite the fact that most private health care plans already covered maternal screenings, prenatal care and related screenings before Obamacare passed, the president attributes Julia’s pregnancy well-being to the law.

And it’s not local sovereignty or financial discipline that results in better schools for Julia’s new son, “Zachary.” Nope. It’s Obama’s “investments” in education and “programs like Race to the Top.” (Is there nothing Race to the Top can’t do?)

“Under President Obama,” the campaign web feature then crows, “Julia starts her own web business. She qualifies for a Small Business Administration loan, giving her the money she needs to invest in her business. President Obama’s tax cuts for small businesses like Julia’s help her to get started. She’s able to hire employees, creating new jobs in her town and helping to grow the local economy.”

In the real world, according to Dun and Bradstreet, the SBA supported fewer than 62,000 small business loans: a measly 0.2 percent of the nation’s 27.5 million small businesses. The vast majority of entrepreneurs get their start without the SBA’s “help” and want only one thing: for Obama and his wealth-confiscators to leave them the heck alone.

As soon as Obama publicized “The Life of Julia” on the web, conservative activists swarmed Twitter to provide real-world counter-narratives. “I’m no Julia,” @CatsPolitics wrote. “As a small-business owner I’m being taxed to death. I need the (government) to get out of my way and let me make money.” Another young conservative female, @BiasedGirl, tweeted: “As a woman and a business owner I’m offended that POTUS thinks I need him to survive and thrive.” Conservative writer Kemberlee Kaye added: “What the Julia example really shows is the Democrat ideal. Complete and total reliance on the government.”

My story? I’ve founded three web ventures over the past eight years without a penny of taxpayer money or government venture socialism. We free-market-centered small-business women can “grow the local economy” and raise our children and improve our schools just fine without the meddling, patriarchal hand of President Obama taking credit for our every last success.

After hyperventilating for months about the Republican “war on women,” Democratic new-media gurus inadvertently have exposed the real Barack Obama: a chauvinistic control freak who would tether every last woman and child to his ever-expanding, budget-busting Nanny State.

Mamas, for the sake of your family’s freedom and our republic’s survival, don’t let your babies grow up to be “Julia.”

by Milami on May. 4, 2012 at 1:05 PM


Quoting mom2klca:

? Who will you vote for? Obama or Romney?

Quoting TruthSeeker.:


Quoting mom2klca:

Who will you vote for in November?

Quoting TruthSeeker.:


Quoting stormcris:

I don't want either of them.






by Ruby Member on May. 4, 2012 at 1:09 PM
1 mom liked this
"elective infant death"?

I got that far, is this satire?
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
by Ruby Member on May. 4, 2012 at 1:19 PM
1 mom liked this

 So here's the bottom line. 

Under Obama, you get everything you want, at the expense of further bankrupting the country.

Under Romney, you're responsible for your own care at the benefit of cutting spending and hopefully getting us back on our feet.

by Ruby Member on May. 4, 2012 at 1:31 PM
3 moms liked this

Quoting jaxTheMomm:

Wow.  You can't skim it.  You have to read it in detail, which takes a long time because I keep stopping to laugh!

"Under the Obama administration, federal financial support for elective infant death as a form of birth control is increased, meaning that Julia would never have been born. The end."

*snort*  Elective infant death as a form of birth control?  *snort snort snort*

I can't do it, I can't keep reading, I have work to do!!

Yeah i got to that line and couldn't go any further. Any article with such an outrageous right wing/anti-abortion/left hating bias bit of propoganda isn't worth wasting time on. It's obviously just a bunch of bs written by a moron.

by Member on May. 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM
2 moms liked this

There's many reasons. One being that people actually take this shit seriously and believe the garbage being spewed by both sides of the political fence.

Obama is no saint, sure. But he stands for the things I believe in, so naturally he's the lesser of the two evils. Way lesser. Republicans seem to want to do nothing aside from point fingers on why we're in the mess we're in, but they offer no viable solution to any of the problems we face. 

This post is just the perfect example of propaganda, and if it wasn't so funny it would be scary.

Quoting mom2klca:

Why lol?

Quoting .BREE.:

lol @ this post. 

OBAMA 2012 :)

by Ruby Member on May. 4, 2012 at 2:06 PM
5 moms liked this

LOL. I think you have it wrong, the Repubs are the ones who think and WANT women to be helpless.

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)