Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Current Events & Hot Topics Current Events & Hot Topics

Stephen King: Tax Me, for F***** Sake!

Posted by on May. 7, 2012 at 6:10 AM
  • 52 Replies
1 mom liked this




Stephen King: Tax Me, for F@%&’s Sake!

The iconic writer scolds the superrich (including himself—and Mitt Romney) for not giving back, and warns of a Kingsian apocalyptic scenario if inequality is not addressed in America.

 |

Chris Christie may be fat, but he ain’t Santa Claus. In fact, he seems unable to decide if he is New Jersey’s governor or its caporegime, and it may be a comment on the coarsening of American discourse that his brash rudeness is often taken for charm. In February, while discussing New Jersey’s newly amended income-tax law, which allows the rich to pay less (proportionally) than the middle class, Christie was asked about Warren Buffett’s observation that he paid less federal income taxes than his personal secretary, and that wasn’t fair. “He should just write a check and shut up,” Christie responded, with his typical verve. “I’m tired of hearing about it. If he wants to give the government more money, he’s got the ability to write a check—go ahead and write it.”

Heard it all before. At a rally in Florida (to support collective bargaining and to express the socialist view that firing teachers with experience was sort of a bad idea), I pointed out that I was paying taxes of roughly 28 percent on my income. My question was, “How come I’m not paying 50?” The governor of New Jersey did not respond to this radical idea, possibly being too busy at the all-you-can-eat cheese buffet at Applebee’s in Jersey City, but plenty of other people of the Christie persuasion did.

Lobbyist Grover Norquist responds to King and begs to differ, 'for f@%&’s sake!'

Cut a check and shut up, they said.

If you want to pay more, pay more, they said.

Tired of hearing about it, they said.

Tough shit for you guys, because I’m not tired of talking about it. I’ve known rich people, and why not, since I’m one of them? The majority would rather douse their dicks with lighter fluid, strike a match, and dance around singing “Disco Inferno” than pay one more cent in taxes to Uncle Sugar. It’s true that some rich folks put at least some of their tax savings into charitable contributions. My wife and I give away roughly $4 million a year to libraries, local fire departments that need updated lifesaving equipment (Jaws of Life tools are always a popular request), schools, and a scattering of organizations that underwrite the arts. Warren Buffett does the same; so does Bill Gates; so does Steven Spielberg; so do the Koch brothers; so did the late Steve Jobs. All fine as far as it goes, but it doesn’t go far enough.

What charitable 1 percenters can’t do is assume responsibility—America’s national responsibilities: the care of its sick and its poor, the education of its young, the repair of its failing infrastructure, the repayment of its staggering war debts. Charity from the rich can’t fix global warming or lower the price of gasoline by one single red penny. That kind of salvation does not come from Mark Zuckerberg or Steve Ballmer saying, “OK, I’ll write a $2 million bonus check to the IRS.” That annoying responsibility stuff comes from three words that are anathema to the Tea Partiers: United American citizenry.

more-tax-teaser-new

And hey, why don’t we get real about this? Most rich folks paying 28 percent taxes do not give out another 28 percent of their income to charity. Most rich folks like to keep their dough. They don’t strip their bank accounts and investment portfolios. They keep them and then pass them on to their children, their children’s children. And what they do give away is—like the monies my wife and I donate—totally at their own discretion. That’s the rich-guy philosophy in a nutshell: don’t tell us how to use our money; we’ll tell you.

The Koch brothers are right-wing creepazoids, but they’re giving right-wing creepazoids. Here’s an example: 68 million fine American dollars to Deerfield Academy. Which is great for Deerfield Academy. But it won’t do squat for cleaning up the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, where food fish are now showing up with black lesions. It won’t pay for stronger regulations to keep BP (or some other bunch of dipshit oil drillers) from doing it again. It won’t repair the levees surrounding New Orleans. It won’t improve education in Mississippi or Alabama. But what the hell—them li’l crackers ain’t never going to go to Deerfield Academy anyway. Fuck ’em if they can’t take a joke.

Here’s another crock of fresh bullshit delivered by the right wing of the Republican Party (which has become, so far as I can see, the only wing of the Republican Party): the richer rich people get, the more jobs they create. Really? I have a total payroll of about 60 people, most of them working for the two radio stations I own in Bangor, Maine. If I hit the movie jackpot—as I have, from time to time—and own a piece of a film that grosses $200 million, what am I going to do with it? Buy another radio station? I don’t think so, since I’m losing my shirt on the ones I own already. But suppose I did, and hired on an additional dozen folks. Good for them. Whoopee-ding for the rest of the economy.

Tired of hearing about it, they said. Tough shit for you guys, because I’m not tired of talking about it. I’ve known rich people, and why not, since I’m one of them?

At the risk of repeating myself, here’s what rich folks do when they get richer: they invest. A lot of those investments are overseas, thanks to the anti-American business policies of the last four administrations. Don’t think so? Check the tag on that T-shirt or gimme cap you’re wearing. If it says MADE IN AMERICA, I’ll … well, I won’t say I’ll eat your shorts, because some of that stuff is made here, but not much of it. And what does get made here doesn’t get made by America’s small cadre of pluted bloatocrats; it’s made, for the most part, in barely-gittin’-by factories in the Deep South, where the only unions people believe in are those solemnized at the altar of the local church (as long as they’re from different sexes, that is).

The U.S. senators and representatives who refuse even to consider raising taxes on the rich—they squall like scalded babies (usually on Fox News) every time the subject comes up—are not, by and large, superrich themselves, although many are millionaires and all have had the equivalent of Obamacare for years. They simply idolize the rich. Don’t ask me why; I don’t get it either, since most rich people are as boring as old, dead dog shit. The Mitch McConnells and John Boehners and Eric Cantors just can’t seem to help themselves. These guys and their right-wing supporters regard deep pockets like Christy Walton and Sheldon Adelson the way little girls regard Justin Bieber … which is to say, with wide eyes, slack jaws, and the drool of adoration dripping from their chins. I’ve gotten the same reaction myself, even though I’m only “baby rich” compared with some of these guys, who float serenely over the lives of the struggling middle class like blimps made of thousand-dollar bills.

In America, the rich are hallowed. Even Warren Buffett, who has largely been drummed out of the club for his radical ideas about putting his money where his mouth is when it comes to patriotism, made the front pages when he announced that he had stage-1 prostate cancer. Stage 1, for God’s sake! A hundred clinics can fix him up, and he can put the bill on his American Express black card! But the press made it sound like the pope’s balls had just dropped off and shattered! Because it was cancer? No! Because it was Warren Buffett, he of Berkshire-Hathaway!

I guess some of this mad right-wing love comes from the idea that in America, anyone can become a Rich Guy if he just works hard and saves his pennies. Mitt Romney has said, in effect, “I’m rich and I don’t apologize for it.” Nobody wants you to, Mitt. What some of us want—those who aren’t blinded by a lot of bullshit persiflage thrown up to mask the idea that rich folks want to keep their damn money—is for you to acknowledge that you couldn’t have made it in America without America. That you were fortunate enough to be born in a country where upward mobility is possible (a subject upon which Barack Obama can speak with the authority of experience), but where the channels making such upward mobility possible are being increasingly clogged. That it’s not fair to ask the middle class to assume a disproportionate amount of the tax burden. Not fair? It’s un-fucking-American is what it is. I don’t want you to apologize for being rich; I want you to acknowledge that in America, we all should have to pay our fair share. That our civics classes never taught us that being American means that—sorry, kiddies—you’re on your own. That those who have received much must be obligated to pay—not to give, not to “cut a check and shut up,” in Governor Christie’s words, but to pay—in the same proportion. That’s called stepping up and not whining about it. That’s called patriotism, a word the Tea Partiers love to throw around as long as it doesn’t cost their beloved rich folks any money.

This has to happen if America is to remain strong and true to its ideals. It’s a practical necessity and a moral imperative. Last year during the Occupy movement, the conservatives who oppose tax equality saw the first real ripples of discontent. Their response was either Marie Antoinette (“Let them eat cake”) or Ebenezer Scrooge (“Are there no prisons? Are there no workhouses?”). Short-sighted, gentlemen. Very short-sighted. If this situation isn’t fairly addressed, last year’s protests will just be the beginning. Scrooge changed his tune after the ghosts visited him. Marie Antoinette, on the other hand, lost her head.

Think about it.

I knew there was more to my liking Stephen King.  He is dead on.

Opinions?

by on May. 7, 2012 at 6:10 AM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
acrogodess
by Silver Member on May. 7, 2012 at 6:39 AM
2 moms liked this
Damn. He hit the nail on the head dead on. *slow clap*
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
lga1965
by on May. 7, 2012 at 8:55 AM
1 mom liked this

 THIS paragraph in particular cracked me up and I agree with him--he's great!:

The U.S. senators and representatives who refuse even to consider raising taxes on the rich—they squall like scalded babies (usually on Fox News) every time the subject comes up—are not, by and large, superrich themselves, although many are millionaires and all have had the equivalent of Obamacare for years. They simply idolize the rich. Don’t ask me why; I don’t get it either, since most rich people are as boring as old, dead dog shit. The Mitch McConnells and John Boehners and Eric Cantors just can’t seem to help themselves. These guys and their right-wing supporters regard deep pockets like Christy Walton and Sheldon Adelson the way little girls regard Justin Bieber … which is to say, with wide eyes, slack jaws, and the drool of adoration dripping from their chins. I’ve gotten the same reaction myself, even though I’m only “baby rich” compared with some of these guys, who float serenely over the lives of the struggling middle class like blimps made of thousand-dollar bills

yourspecialkid
by Platinum Member on May. 7, 2012 at 9:03 AM
1 mom liked this

 What is preventing him from paying more?  The IRS will be more than happy to accept it.

Anyone with an ounce of intelligence knows we could take every asset of every American and still be trillions short on what our obligations are as of TODAY.

ta2dirishlass
by Member on May. 7, 2012 at 10:03 AM
1 mom liked this

I love Stephen King.

EireLass
by Ruby Member on May. 7, 2012 at 10:07 AM

You can make donations to the IRS. Wonder why he doesn't??

GraceHudson
by on May. 7, 2012 at 10:08 AM
Damn


mom2the.rescue
by Bronze Member on May. 7, 2012 at 10:15 AM
2 moms liked this

I'm probably really wrong, but if the IRS gets a big unexpected check, it would be dumped in a large account of some type.  But if they're taxing the rich in a different way, there'd be a plan in place for where all the extra money would go.  And a lot more money would come in than the little extra bits the rich people with consciences give.  Some people make insane amounts of money, and they should be paying much more in taxes. 

Yes, we'll always be in debt.  But isn't it better to chip away at that than keep growing it, while letting certain people get away with not paying their fair share?

Quoting yourspecialkid:

 What is preventing him from paying more?  The IRS will be more than happy to accept it.

Anyone with an ounce of intelligence knows we could take every asset of every American and still be trillions short on what our obligations are as of TODAY.


Jalestra
by on May. 7, 2012 at 10:19 AM
2 moms liked this

I think this is just a bunch of rich people trying to look good. "Oh, see, Stephen King WANTS to pay more taxes, poor guy can't. But he's such a good guy I'll go buy his new book". If they were serious they could post their tax records and show us WHY they are paying less. Is it because they talk a good game, but behind closed doors they are taking advantage of every single loophole, no matter how miniscule? I think they are being melodramatic. Just cut a check if you're serious. SHOW me you really care, then I'll believe it. Until then, I think this is just a bunch of rich people trying to score some brownie points.

I

trz031407
by on May. 7, 2012 at 10:40 AM
He's genius. Makes very much sense.

I agree , because I'm lower to middle class, I can't stand seeing people with ridiculously nice things. Emphasis on ridiculous (as in the magazines my boss gets where a pet bed cost $600+)
Especially on the days when I'm hungry. And cant buy food, have to wait until home. It's painful. It's not their fault individually so there's no one to be mad at but myself. But it is like a smack in the face sometimes. My boss will even say stuff like "you can look, i doubt you could afford any of it though"

Like being at WIC in my 2door hatchback no a/c in Florida car, & there's gals driving in these souped up new cars with rims & LV interior.. I have to wonder are they a whore? A stripper? Is it the pimps car? Wtf?

I know it's not ok to judge but these are the thoughts I get when it happens. Mama always said life isn't fair so all I can do is keep trying to make it a decent life for my babies. even if that means I have to put out 1/2 my income for my kids to stay in this A school district forever. That's probably why we struggle, but I can't fail my kids. Opportunity will knock at my door one day hopefully.
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
Jalestra
by on May. 7, 2012 at 11:24 AM

You know, I had a whole response because I live a life VERY similar to yours, TRZ. But what really bugs me is one comment. Does a girl have to be a whore or a stripper to afford a nice car? Can't they have good jobs or come from a family with money? I mean, I live in an area where 20 somethings are driving $100,000 cars and I don't think I've ever just assumed they are whores or strippers to be able to afford them, even if some of them dress like one. Or even just married to a guy with lots of money. Maybe that's not what you intended it to sound like, but it seems like you think only women who are whores can afford a suped up car.

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)