Election map vs Civil War map

[_Kissy_]

[krysstizzle]

I don't know, I didn't post it. Interesting historical context? That's what I thought of it. 

Quoting jcrew6:

Why the need to try and make a model fit an agenda to associate the civil war to American votes in 2012?

Quoting krysstizzle:

The original map comparison works better in this example. If you wanted to use your map, a breakdown of popular vote by county, you'd have to compare it to something like slavery per capita at the county (or similar) level. 

Quoting jcrew6:

You are comparing electoral map to civil war map?





Lets look at popular vote map. Tells a different story. Just goes to show someone( like the OP) can manipulate data to serve a narrow minded agenda.

[Mommy_of_Riley]

This isn't a new trend. It's coming that the south is republican and the north/northeast is democrat

[jcrew6]

You find it interesting that someone can take one portion )and not complete data ) to serve their agenda? I find it narrow minded.

Quoting krysstizzle:

I don't know, I didn't post it. Interesting historical context? That's what I though of it. 

Quoting jcrew6:

Why the need to try and make a model fit an agenda to associate the civil war to American votes in 2012?

Quoting krysstizzle:

The original map comparison works better in this example. If you wanted to use your map, a breakdown of popular vote by county, you'd have to compare it to something like slavery per capita at the county (or similar) level. 

Quoting jcrew6:

You are comparing electoral map to civil war map?









Lets look at popular vote map. Tells a different story. Just goes to show someone( like the OP) can manipulate data to serve a narrow minded agenda.

[krysstizzle]

Not complete how? I find the comparison of state electoral votes and states that had slavery to be a mildly interesting comparsion. 

And what agenda? It's not a secret that the southern states are generally conservative and Republican. It's not like it's a conspiracy, it just is what it is. 

Quoting jcrew6:

You find it interesting that someone can take one portion and not complete data to serve their agenda? I find it narrow minded.

Quoting krysstizzle:

I don't know, I didn't post it. Interesting historical context? That's what I though of it. 

Quoting jcrew6:

Why the need to try and make a model fit an agenda to associate the civil war to American votes in 2012?

Quoting krysstizzle:

The original map comparison works better in this example. If you wanted to use your map, a breakdown of popular vote by county, you'd have to compare it to something like slavery per capita at the county (or similar) level. 

Quoting jcrew6:

You are comparing electoral map to civil war map?







Lets look at popular vote map. Tells a different story. Just goes to show someone( like the OP) can manipulate data to serve a narrow minded agenda.

[violetlady]

Interesting ...

[Godgaveme4]

 

Quoting JanuaryBaby06:

that is funny. not in a haha way but in the oh that makes sence kinda way-lol.

 How does it make sense?

[Stephanie329]

It's funny when people play dumb.

Quoting Godgaveme4:

 What exactly is your point?

[babie113]

see nothings changed...well not much 

jk

[Godgaveme4]

 

Quoting Stephanie329:

It's funny when people play dumb.

Quoting Godgaveme4:

 What exactly is your point?

 Just wondering what her point is.  I could assume what her point is but I tey not to do that.

And she apparently does not want to explain her point.

[JustCJ]

All the votes in the blue states...the majority of the blue counties..had big cities in them. Most counties in ALL of the states were red. Unfortunately, the "cities" with the larger populations decided and of course were blue...how much of that is minority? Racist? Sure as hell could be.