Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Current Events & Hot Topics Current Events & Hot Topics

Woman dies in hospital after being refused an abortion for a fetus the hospital said was going to die anyways.

Posted by on Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:37 AM
  • 34 Replies
1 mom liked this

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/frontpage/2012/1114/1224326575203.html

Woman 'denied a termination' dies in hospital

KITTY HOLLAND and PAUL CULLEN, Health Correspondent

Wed, Nov 14, 2012

Two investigations are under way into the death of a woman who was 17 weeks pregnant, at University Hospital Galway last month.

Savita Halappanavar (31), a dentist, presented with back pain at the hospital on October 21st, was found to be miscarrying, and died of septicaemia a week later.

Her husband, Praveen Halappanavar (34), an engineer at Boston Scientific in Galway, says she asked several times over a three-day period that the pregnancy be terminated. He says that, having been told she was miscarrying, and after one day in severe pain, Ms Halappanavar asked for a medical termination.

This was refused, he says, because the foetal heartbeat was still present and they were told, “this is a Catholic country”.

She spent a further 2½ days “in agony” until the foetal heartbeat stopped.

Intensive care

The dead foetus was removed and Savita was taken to the high dependency unit and then the intensive care unit, where she died of septicaemia on the 28th.

An autopsy carried out by Dr Grace Callagy two days later found she died of septicaemia “documented ante-mortem” and E.coli ESBL.

A hospital spokesman confirmed the Health Service Executive had begun an investigation while the hospital had also instigated an internal investigation. He said the hospital extended its sympathy to the family and friends of Ms Halappanavar but could not discuss the details of any individual case.

Speaking from Belgaum in the Karnataka region of southwest India, Mr Halappanavar said an internal examination was performed when she first presented.

“The doctor told us the cervix was fully dilated, amniotic fluid was leaking and unfortunately the baby wouldn’t survive.” The doctor, he says, said it should be over in a few hours. There followed three days, he says, of the foetal heartbeat being checked several times a day.

“Savita was really in agony. She was very upset, but she accepted she was losing the baby. When the consultant came on the ward rounds on Monday morning Savita asked if they could not save the baby could they induce to end the pregnancy. The consultant said, ‘As long as there is a foetal heartbeat we can’t do anything’.

“Again on Tuesday morning, the ward rounds and the same discussion. The consultant said it was the law, that this is a Catholic country. Savita [a Hindu] said: ‘I am neither Irish nor Catholic’ but they said there was nothing they could do.

“That evening she developed shakes and shivering and she was vomiting. She went to use the toilet and she collapsed. There were big alarms and a doctor took bloods and started her on antibiotics.

“The next morning I said she was so sick and asked again that they just end it, but they said they couldn’t.”

Critically ill

At lunchtime the foetal heart had stopped and Ms Halappanavar was brought to theatre to have the womb contents removed. “When she came out she was talking okay but she was very sick. That’s the last time I spoke to her.”

At 11 pm he got a call from the hospital. “They said they were shifting her to intensive care. Her heart and pulse were low, her temperature was high. She was sedated and critical but stable. She stayed stable on Friday but by 7pm on Saturday they said her heart, kidneys and liver weren’t functioning. She was critically ill. That night, we lost her.”

Mr Halappanavar took his wife’s body home on Thursday, November 1st, where she was cremated and laid to rest on November 3rd.

The hospital spokesman said that in general sudden hospital deaths were reported to the coroner. In the case of maternal deaths, a risk review of the case was carried out.

External experts were involved in this review and the family consulted on the terms of reference. They were also interviewed by the review team and given a copy of the report.

by on Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:37 AM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
p1r4t3cr0pc1rcl
by on Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:38 AM

Yup. This will happen with religion running things. 

SuperChicken
by on Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:39 AM
1 mom liked this

This is such a sad, and unnecessary, loss of life.   I think it's important to share though as so many anti-choice groups insist that a woman is never in danger of losing her life when an abortion is refused.

my3littleboys
by Member on Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:40 AM
Sad
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
Jynnifer292
by on Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:41 AM
2 moms liked this

 Yes, because letting two people suffer and die was much more "Catholic" than saving one life and letting the one go that was not going to live anyway. Insert foul language here.

she_walk_softly
by on Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:42 AM
How sad.That hospital let her suffer and die.
Posted on the NEW CafeMom Mobile
Mom2Just1
by Gold Member on Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:45 AM

This is really sad.  A woman lost her life and she could have been saved.

Daisypath Anniversary tickersLilypie Maternity tickers

Lilypie Kids Birthday tickers



trippyhippy
by Gold Member on Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:46 AM

Disgusting.  Now two are dead.  Is god happier ths way?


FromAtoZ
by AllieCat on Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:54 AM

And people want this country to be a Christian Nation.  

That woman's life could have been saved, should have been saved.

This angers me, makes my heart hurt.

12hellokitty
by Ruby Member on Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:56 AM
1 mom liked this


Quoting SuperChicken:

This is such a sad, and unnecessary, loss of life.   I think it's important to share though as so many anti-choice groups insist that a woman is never in danger of losing her life when an abortion is refused.


When the life of the mother is a risk it should have been permissible to induce the pregnancy.  This hospital is responsible for having made poor judgement, as this is not in line with Catholic teaching. 

Veni.Vidi.Vici.
by on Nov. 14, 2012 at 10:59 AM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN