Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Former L.A. archbishop disciplined over handling of sex abuse allegations

Posted by on Feb. 2, 2013 at 7:40 PM
  • 21 Replies

Los Angeles (CNN) -- In what activists describe as unprecedented, the Catholic archbishop in Los Angeles has relieved a retired cardinal of his public and administrative duties for his mishandling of "painful and brutal" allegations of sexual abuse by priests.

Archbishop Jose H. Gomez of the Los Angeles Archdiocese disciplined his predecessor, the now retired Cardinal Roger Mahony, after a California judge forced the archdiocese to release about 12,000 pages of church documents revealing how it handled allegations of abuse.

There were 192 priests and bishops named in litigation, the archdiocese said.

"The cases span decades," Gomez said in a statement Thursday. Some go back to the 1930s. The documents were released on the archdiocese's website.

"But that does not make them less serious. I find these files to be brutal and painful reading," he said.

Meanwhile, the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office is reviewing the newly released set of documents, spokeswoman Jane Robison said Friday. No member of the Los Angeles church hierarchy has been charged with any wrongdoing, she said.

Also on Friday, Mahony posted on his personal blog a response he sent to Gomez. The letter provides "the history and context of what we have been through since the mid-1980s," Mahony said.

When Gomez began to take over the archdiocese in May 2010, "you began to become aware of all that had been done here over the years for the protection of children and youth," Mahony wrote to Gomez. The archdiocese became "second to none" in such protection, he wrote.

"Not once over these past years did you ever raise any questions about our policies, practices, or procedures in dealing with the problem of clergy sexual misconduct involving minors," Mahony wrote.

"I have stated time and time again that I made mistakes, especially in the mid-1980s. I apologized for those mistakes, and committed myself to make certain that the Archdiocese was safe for everyone," he wrote.

Gomez cited Mahony for serious shortcomings after victims came forward during his tenure.

"Effective immediately, I have informed Cardinal Mahony that he will no longer have any administrative or public duties," Gomez said in a statement.

David Clohessy, director of the Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests (SNAP), described Gomez's decision as unprecedented, but it amounts to a mere slap on the wrist long after the fact.

"I can't think of any instance in which a current Catholic prelate -- and that would include bishops and cardinals -- restricted or, in this case, promised to restrict their predecessor," said Clohessy, who has spent 24 years monitoring sex abuse allegations against priests.

Clohessy said that between the ages of about 11 and 16 he was sexually abused by a priest in Missouri.

"But to say to a retired employee that we're going to give you fewer roles, it's a symbolic gesture and a pretty hollow one at that," Clohessy said.

"A meaningless gesture. He should have been demoted or disciplined by the church hierarchy, in Rome and in the U.S.," he said.

But Mahony was not as much as denounced when he was in power, Clohessy said.

Mahony "expressed his sorrow" for the alleged abuse, which victims reported during his tenure as archbishop from 1984 to 2011, the archdiocese said Friday.

But Clohessy feels that he and other church officials knew too much and did too little, and that there have not been enough consequences to deter future abuse or cover-ups.

"If you successfully conceal your wrongdoing, you can keep your job," Clohessy said.

Mahony hasn't had administrative duties since his retirement in March 2011, archdiocese spokesman Tod M. Tamberg said.

Mahony, who will turn 77 later this month, can continue to celebrate the sacraments with no restrictions and can vote in conclave in a papal election until age 80, Tamberg said.

"He is reducing his public profile, which included numerous invitations in California and around the country to give guest lectures on immigration reform, on the church in the 21st century, etc.," Tamberg said in an e-mail to CNN. "He remains a priest in good standing, and a cardinal of the church."

At the same time, Auxiliary Bishop Thomas J. Curry, who's the regional bishop of Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties in California, has resigned and "has also publicly apologized for his decisions while serving as Vicar for Clergy" in relation to the sex abuse cases, Gomez said.

"I have accepted his request to be relieved of his responsibility," Gomez said.

Clohessy called the resignation "less noteworthy."

"Eight to 12 bishops around the world have resigned because of these cases," Clohessy said.

On Friday, SNAP leaders and supporters who said they were victimized as children by priests called upon federal and local prosecutors to investigate the sexual abuse allegations in the church files.

The activists also called upon silent victims to come forward and disclose additional sexual offenses. At a press conference outside the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angeles, the activists called Thursday's release of church files "incomplete."

Manuel Vega of Oxnard, California, said a priest abused him from age 10 to 15. On Friday, he called for a congressional hearing. He accused the church of withholding documents, especially with the priest who abused him and priests who abused his friends.

"We've had congressional hearings for doping," Vega told reporters. "But where's our congressional hearing? This has not only impacted L.A. but it's impacted the entire United States and throughout the world."

Jim Robertson of Los Angeles said he found no files relating to the priest who abused him. He described the church hierarchy as "corporate officers of a corporation."

"So far this is nonsense. These people have spent millions and millions of the faithful's dollars to protect themselves," Robertson told reporters. "These people behaved horrifically, absolutely horrifically."

The released files include letters by underage male victims accusing priests of sexually abusing them.

In one letter, a clergyman is described as "a very charismatic and much loved priest in the Hispanic community and people would never suspect of any wrongdoing," a victim wrote.

But when the victim was 17 years old in 1983, the priest took the youngster to a mountain retreat near Big Bear Lake in California, and when they took a break by a stream, the priest "gave me a hug and kissed me as if I were a woman," the victim wrote.

Later, at the cabin, "as I stood looking at the pictures on the walls, he reached out and fondled me," the victim wrote in a letter to a church official.

The priest also "forced me to have sex" in a church rectory, a hotel and in a mobile home near Tijuana, Mexico, that someone loaned the priest, the victim wrote.

"While I felt forgiven by God, I still feel dirty," the victim wrote.

In the file of another priest -- the one whom Vega identified as his abuser -- the contents were largely newspaper clippings about the priest being accused of child molestation. The priest was in charge of the altar boy program at an Oxnard church.

At the end of the last page of the priest's file is a handwritten note stating: "Ventura DA (district attorney) *3/27/03 -- Charged w/ felony 25 counts of child molestation of 8 youths in late 70's-early 80's."

The archdiocese published the names of accused clergy in a 2004 report, but the release of Thursday's documents will allow the public to trace how the church handled the allegations. It may bring to light some cases in which accusations were kept under wraps and the accused were kept out of the sight of the law or accusers.

The documents were evidence in 508 civil cases by sex abuse victims that were settled in one stroke in 2007. Victims received $660 million in the landmark judgment.

Most of the documents were inner-church correspondences about accused clergy. The archdiocese fought to purge the names of the accused from the papers until Thursday, when Judge Emilie Elias ruled that they be made public by February 22.

The church published them shortly after the ruling. There are 124 personnel files in total, 82 of which reveal sex abuse allegations against minors.

The release "concludes a sad and shameful chapter in the history of our Local Church," the archdiocese said.

It warned that although the names of the abused have been deleted, some may recognize their cases.

"We understand this experience may be a difficult one," it said

http://www.cnn.com/2013/02/01/us/california-sex-abuse-documents/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

by on Feb. 2, 2013 at 7:40 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
jllcali
by LoyalAndCute on Feb. 2, 2013 at 9:07 PM
3 moms liked this
Pathetic. The abuse never should have happened, and if the catholic church was a fraction of the moral authority it claims to be, the abuse wouldn't have been covered up and gone on so long.
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
Veni.Vidi.Vici.
by on Feb. 2, 2013 at 9:08 PM

Drop in the bucket, but good step in a good direction.

LindaClement
by Linda on Feb. 2, 2013 at 9:21 PM

I agree.

Quoting Veni.Vidi.Vici.:

Drop in the bucket, but good step in a good direction.


Cutenessmom
by Bronze Member on Feb. 2, 2013 at 9:27 PM

I know  there was so more   allegations inDetroit and such...

mikiemom
by Ruby Member on Feb. 3, 2013 at 8:30 AM

I know exactly what this will show. It not only show the catholic church protecting these men but it will show them relocating them to new parishes far enough away and allowing them to continue their abuse. The Catholic Church was complicit in not just cover-up but the abuse itself.

LoveMyBoyK
by Ruby Member on Feb. 3, 2013 at 8:43 AM
Now wait for the usual suspects to show up accusing you of persecuting and attacking Christians.

The whole issue is heart wrenching. So many innocent lives torn apart and such a massive Coverup. Those priests need to be in jail!!
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
mikiemom
by Ruby Member on Feb. 3, 2013 at 8:46 AM

 

I'm just posting news, I would love to hear from the Catholics to know how this makes them feel about their church. Their child could have been the next victim and still could be.

Quoting LoveMyBoyK:

Now wait for the usual suspects to show up accusing you of persecuting and attacking Christians.

The whole issue is heart wrenching. So many innocent lives torn apart and such a massive Coverup. Those priests need to be in jail!!


 

lizmarie1975
by Gold Member on Feb. 3, 2013 at 9:07 AM
Scum
Posted on the NEW CafeMom Mobile
shannonnigans
by Gold Member on Feb. 5, 2013 at 8:34 AM
A HUGE coverup that makes Penn State seem trivial by comparison. This evil POS obstructed justice every step of the way and did so with the Church's blessing. Where are our usual hypocrites who usually defend or downplay this repeatedly? They're strangely silent.
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
mikiemom
by Ruby Member on Feb. 5, 2013 at 10:23 AM

 I can't believe that parents still allow their children to go to the catholic church. I honestly didn't expect them to answer this post. They probably see this as persecution of their faith. I would like to know how they feel about this though. It's obvious that the church condones and supports pedophilia, it is mind boggling.


Quoting shannonnigans:

A HUGE coverup that makes Penn State seem trivial by comparison. This evil POS obstructed justice every step of the way and did so with the Church's blessing. Where are our usual hypocrites who usually defend or downplay this repeatedly? They're strangely silent.


 

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)



Featured