Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Current Events & Hot Topics Current Events & Hot Topics

Is gender neutral language important?

Posted by on Feb. 3, 2013 at 10:27 PM
  • 70 Replies

Wash. state considers gender-neutral language bill

OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) — In Washington state, dairymen, freshmen and even penmanship could soon be things of the past.

Over the past six years, state officials have engaged in the onerous task of changing the language used in the state's copious laws, including thousands of words and phrases, many written more than a century ago when the idea of women working on police forces or on fishing boats wasn't a consideration.

That process is slated to draw to a close this year. So while the state has already welcomed "firefighters," ''clergy" and "police officers" into its lexicon, "ombuds" (in place of ombudsman) and "security guards" (previously "watchmen,") appear to be next, along with "dairy farmers," ''first-year students" and "handwriting."

"Some people would say 'oh, it's not a big thing, do you really have to go through the process of changing the language,'" said Seattle Councilmember Sally Clark who was one of the catalysts for the change. "But language matters. It's how we signal a level of respect for each other."

About half of all U.S. states have moved toward such gender-neutral language at varying levels, from drafting bills to changing state constitutions, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Florida and Minnesota have already completely revised their laws as Washington state is doing.

The final installment of Washington state's bill already has sailed through the Senate Commerce and Labor Committee with unanimous approval. The nearly 500-page bill has one more committee stop scheduled before full Senate debate.

Crispin Thurlow, a sociolinguist and associate professor of language and communication at the University of Washington-Bothell, said the project was admirable.

He said that as language evolves, such efforts are more than symbolic.

"Changing words can change what we think about the world around us," he said. "These tiny moments accrue and become big movements."

Clark and former councilmember Jan Drago — the Seattle City Council has long eschewed the terms councilwoman or councilman — brought the issue to Sen. Jeannie Kohl-Welles in 2006 after they came across references to firemen and policemen in the mayor's proposed budget, as well as in state law dealing with local-government pensions.

Clark and Drago's findings sparked the initial gender-neutral language law that was passed in 2007, immediately changing those terms and directing the state code reviser's office to do a full revision of the rest of the code. A 1983 Washington state law had already required all new statutes to be written in gender-neutral terms, so state officials were tasked with going through the rest of state statutes dating back to 1854 to revise the rest.

As in past bills on the issue that have tackled sections of the state code, some revisions were as simple as adding "or her" after "his." Others required a little more scrutiny. Phrases like "man's past" changes to "humankind's past" and a "prudent man or woman" is simply a "prudent person."

Kyle Thiessen, the state's code reviser who has been working on the project along with two attorneys since 2008, said that the work was not without obstacles.

Words like "manhole" and "manlock" aren't so easily replaced, he said. Substitutes have been suggested — "utility hole" and "air lock serving as a decompression chamber for workers." But Thiessen said those references will be left alone to avoid confusion.

Republican state Rep. Shelly Short, of Addy, has voted against earlier gender-neutral language bills and said she plans to do the same this year.

"I don't see the need to do gender neutrality," she said, adding that her constituents want her to focus on jobs and the economy. "We're women and we're men."

Kohl-Welles, who has sponsored each of the gender-neutral language bills, said that while this project hasn't been her top legislation every year, "overall, it has important significance."

"I believe," she said, "that the culture has changed."

by on Feb. 3, 2013 at 10:27 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
turtle68
by Mahinaarangi on Feb. 3, 2013 at 10:35 PM
1 mom liked this

 words like police officers and fire fighters I can understand....manhole and manlock...even ombudsan, not so much.

on a side note I never understood the need for actresses to be known as actors...I think I missed that one.

lga1965
by on Feb. 3, 2013 at 10:35 PM
5 moms liked this

 Ahhhh, gee, why? I don't like the sound of gender neutral. Isn't anyone happy to be their gender anymore? I'm glad to be a female. Anyone else?

Veni.Vidi.Vici.
by on Feb. 3, 2013 at 10:36 PM
1 mom liked this


Quoting lga1965:

 Ahhhh, gee, why? I don't like the sound of gender neutral. Isn't anyone happy to be their gender anymore? I'm glad to be a female. Anyone else?

please read the article

JTE11
by Member on Feb. 3, 2013 at 10:37 PM
2 moms liked this

What are they going to call actual men?  Person oh person, this is ridiculous.

lga1965
by on Feb. 3, 2013 at 10:51 PM

 I did. So....

Fireperson...policeperson? LOL. This has been a subject for discussion and laughs for YEARS.

Quoting Veni.Vidi.Vici.:


Quoting lga1965:

 Ahhhh, gee, why? I don't like the sound of gender neutral. Isn't anyone happy to be their gender anymore? I'm glad to be a female. Anyone else?

please read the article

 

Euphoric
by Bazinga! on Feb. 3, 2013 at 11:07 PM

 This remind me of  a stand up show I watched with Geore Carlin.

kam013
by Silver Member on Feb. 3, 2013 at 11:17 PM
3 moms liked this
Personally I think the time, money and other resources could be better spent elsewhere. Not even close to a priority IMHO.
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
stormcris
by Christy on Feb. 3, 2013 at 11:18 PM
2 moms liked this

SMH so what are we going to do about human?

Man does not simply refer to the male sex it refers to the entire human race.

desertlvn
by Silver Member on Feb. 3, 2013 at 11:24 PM

I am a pretty strong feminist, and it honestly doesn't bother me.

FromAtoZ
by AllieCat on Feb. 3, 2013 at 11:31 PM

While I can understand why some see such a need, I do think it is a waste of resources that could be better used else where.

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)