Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Current Events & Hot Topics Current Events & Hot Topics

Catholic hospital says it was 'morally wrong' to argue fetus is not a person

Posted by   + Show Post

Catholic hospital says it was 'morally wrong' to argue fetus is not a person

By CNN Staff
updated 8:51 PM EST, Mon February 4, 2013
Watch this video

Catholic hospital flips on fetus death

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Catholic hospital reverses stance in case of Lori Stodghill, who died there
  • Her husband sued the hospital on behalf of his wife and their unborn twins
  • Attorneys for the hospital argued in court that a fetus is not a person

(CNN) -- A Catholic hospital in hot water for claiming in a Colorado court that a fetus is not a person backtracked on Monday, saying it was "morally wrong" to make the argument while defending itself in a wrongful death lawsuit.

The flip-flop concerns the case of Lori Stodghill. She was 28 weeks pregnant with twins when she went to the emergency room of St. Thomas More Hospital in Canon City, Colorado, vomiting and short of breath.

She went into cardiac arrest in the lobby and died. That was New Year's Day 2006.

Her husband, Jeremy Stodghill, sued the hospital and its owner, Catholic Health Initiatives, for the wrongful deaths of his wife and their unborn sons.

CO mom fights for law protecting fetuses

Case fuels debate over when life begins

Given the Catholic Church's belief that life begins at conception, defense attorneys for the hospital and doctors then entered an unusual argument.

Proposal would give way out of birth-control coverage

They said that under state law, an embryo is not person until it is born alive.

The claim attracted widespread attention and criticism, which apparently forced the about-face.

"In the discussion with the Church leaders, CHI representatives acknowledged that it was morally wrong for attorneys representing St. Thomas More Hospital to cite the state's Wrongful Death Act in defense of this lawsuit. That law does not consider fetuses to be persons, which directly contradicts the moral teachings of the Church," Catholic Health Initiatives said in a statement.

It promised that attorneys for the hospital would not cite the Wrongful Death Act in any future hearings.

Stodghill has petitioned the Colorado Supreme Court to hear his case.

The state's bishops similarly released a statement, expressing support for CHI and for the Stodghill family.

"We join CHI in affirming the fundamental truth that human life, human dignity and human rights begin at conception. No law can ever mitigate God-given human rights," they said. "Each human life is a sacred gift, created as a unique and unrepeatable expression of God's love. Life is given by God, and the right to life is a fundamental good, without which no other rights can be enjoyed."

North West Passage

by on Feb. 4, 2013 at 11:19 PM
Replies (11-20):
NWP
by guerrilla girl on Feb. 5, 2013 at 8:20 AM

BUMP!

lizzielouaf
by Gold Member on Feb. 5, 2013 at 9:04 AM

The hospital offered to forgive the $47,000 judgment if Jeremy Stodghill dropped his appeal. I believe at this time Stodghill is in the bankruptcy process.


Quoting FrogSalad:

How convenient.

I wonder if they're still going to expect the husband to pay their legal fees.




IntactivistMama
by on Feb. 5, 2013 at 9:38 AM
How hypocritical of them.
Posted on the NEW CafeMom Mobile
MeAndTommyLee
by Platinum Member on Feb. 5, 2013 at 11:22 AM

As they should!  What a  contradiction for the sake of almighty greed.

mikiemom
by Ruby Member on Feb. 5, 2013 at 11:37 AM

We all know it's not about human life with the Catholic Church it's about greed and amassing wealth and power.

NWP
by guerrilla girl on Feb. 5, 2013 at 11:53 AM
Why is he in bankruptcy and why does the hospital have a judgement against him? I guess I don't know a lot about this case

Quoting lizzielouaf:

The hospital offered to forgive the $47,000 judgment if Jeremy Stodghill dropped his appeal. I believe at this time Stodghill is in the bankruptcy process.



Quoting FrogSalad:

How convenient.

I wonder if they're still going to expect the husband to pay their legal fees.





Posted on the NEW CafeMom Mobile
lizzielouaf
by Gold Member on Feb. 5, 2013 at 12:55 PM

The hospital was suing for their legal expenses. 


Quoting NWP:

Why is he in bankruptcy and why does the hospital have a judgement against him? I guess I don't know a lot about this case

Quoting lizzielouaf:

The hospital offered to forgive the $47,000 judgment if Jeremy Stodghill dropped his appeal. I believe at this time Stodghill is in the bankruptcy process.



Quoting FrogSalad:

How convenient.

I wonder if they're still going to expect the husband to pay their legal fees.







NWP
by guerrilla girl on Feb. 5, 2013 at 1:02 PM

Did he lose his case?

Quoting lizzielouaf:

The hospital was suing for their legal expenses. 


Quoting NWP:

Why is he in bankruptcy and why does the hospital have a judgement against him? I guess I don't know a lot about this case

Quoting lizzielouaf:

The hospital offered to forgive the $47,000 judgment if Jeremy Stodghill dropped his appeal. I believe at this time Stodghill is in the bankruptcy process.



Quoting FrogSalad:

How convenient.

I wonder if they're still going to expect the husband to pay their legal fees.








North West Passage

lizzielouaf
by Gold Member on Feb. 5, 2013 at 1:06 PM

He did. This was part of the whole issue of the defense using a fetus is not a person. 


Quoting NWP:

Did he lose his case?

Quoting lizzielouaf:

The hospital was suing for their legal expenses. 


Quoting NWP:

Why is he in bankruptcy and why does the hospital have a judgement against him? I guess I don't know a lot about this case

Quoting lizzielouaf:

The hospital offered to forgive the $47,000 judgment if Jeremy Stodghill dropped his appeal. I believe at this time Stodghill is in the bankruptcy process.



Quoting FrogSalad:

How convenient.

I wonder if they're still going to expect the husband to pay their legal fees.










NWP
by guerrilla girl on Feb. 5, 2013 at 1:13 PM

Oh...I wonder then if he has a valid case for appeal if they changed thier mind after the fact?

Quoting lizzielouaf:

He did. This was part of the whole issue of the defense using a fetus is not a person. 


Quoting NWP:

Did he lose his case?

Quoting lizzielouaf:

The hospital was suing for their legal expenses. 


Quoting NWP:

Why is he in bankruptcy and why does the hospital have a judgement against him? I guess I don't know a lot about this case

Quoting lizzielouaf:

The hospital offered to forgive the $47,000 judgment if Jeremy Stodghill dropped his appeal. I believe at this time Stodghill is in the bankruptcy process.



Quoting FrogSalad:

How convenient.

I wonder if they're still going to expect the husband to pay their legal fees.











North West Passage

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN