The Pro-Abortion Side is Losing Debate, They Know It and Hate It
he pro-aborts are losing. They know it, and they hate it.
As LifeNews.com reported in January: ‚ÄúCNN released the results of a new poll showing a majority of Americans want all or most abortions prohibited ‚Äď a clear pro-life majority.‚ÄĚ
Indeed, the winds of life are blowing free the foul stench of a pro-abortion culture of death.
This is why President Obama and his fellow pro-abort zealot, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, have unilaterally, arbitrarily and unconstitutionally forced, through Obamacare, every taxpaying American citizen to fund ‚Äúfree‚ÄĚ abortion-on-demand.
This draconian overreach is in perfect keeping with the 2012 DNC platform, which, for the first time, admits without shame: ‚ÄúThe Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman‚Äôs right to ‚Ä¶ abortion, regardless of ability to pay.‚ÄĚ
Psalm 8:28 commands: ‚ÄúDefend the weak and the fatherless; uphold the cause of the poor and the oppressed.‚ÄĚ
To be sure, there can be none more oppressed than the tens of millions who, over four short decades, have been ‚Äď and will continue to be ‚Äď slaughtered within the safe haven of their own mothers‚Äô wombs.
With its 1973 Roe decision, the U.S. Supreme Court put the government‚Äôs official stamp of approval on mass murder. Since then, the battle lines have been drawn. This is war. They, ‚Äúpro-choicers,‚ÄĚ are the bad guys, while pro-lifers are the good guys. It really is that simple ‚Äď that black and white. It‚Äôs good versus evil.
History will reflect as much.
To the unenthusiastic mother, politically motivated abortion violence is deviously portrayed as an acceptable escape from what may seem a desperate situation. To the innocent child, it is ‚Äď without fail and without due process ‚Äď execution by torture.
Consider the horrific practice of Partial-Birth Abortion, innocuously tagged ‚ÄúIntact Dilation and Extraction.‚ÄĚ This is a practice so brutal and so needless that even the liberal American Medical Association (AMA) admitted that it is never necessary under any circumstances.
During a partial-birth abortion, the abortionist pulls a fully ‚Äúviable‚ÄĚ child ‚Äď often kicking and thrashing ‚Äď feet first from her mother‚Äôs womb, leaving only the top of her head in the birth canal. This is so the abortionist can technically claim to be performing an abortion, rather than committing murder.
He then stabs the child through the base of her skull with scissors, piercing her brain until her kicking and moving about suddenly and violently jerks to a halt. Next, he opens the scissors to enlarge the wound, inserts a vacuum tube and sucks out her brains, thereby collapsing her skull.
Her now limp and lifeless body is then cast away like so much garbage.
Appalling, isn‚Äôt it? Infanticide by any objective measure.
So, naturally, Mr. Obama, reasonable fellow that he is, agrees with the AMA, correct? He and other ‚Äúpro-choicers‚ÄĚ were the first to applaud the high court when it upheld a ban on this Hitlerian practice, right?
Barack Obama unbelievably called the Court‚Äôs decision in Gonzales v. Carhart part of a concerted effort ‚Äúto steadily roll back the hard-won rights of American women.‚ÄĚ In so doing, he revealed to the world that leftist support for abortion ‚Äúrights‚ÄĚ has everything to do with politics and nothing to do with science or ‚Äúhealth care.‚ÄĚ
Moreover, consider Mr. Obama‚Äôs opposition to the ‚ÄúBorn Alive Infant Protection Act.‚ÄĚ It passed both houses of Congress in 2002 with overwhelming bipartisan support. Born Alive very simply requires that when a baby survives an attempted abortion ‚Äď when she is ‚Äúborn alive‚ÄĚ ‚Äď further attempts to kill her must immediately cease, and steps must be taken to save her life.
Yet, incredibly, this president, while serving in the Illinois Senate, vehemently opposed the bill‚Äôs Illinois twin. He complained that requiring efforts to save the live victim of a botched abortion is ‚Äúreally designed simply to burden the original decision of the woman and the physician to induce labor and perform an abortion.‚ÄĚ
Barack Obama‚Äôs solution? Finish off the little pest.
So prepare for Obama and other pro-aborts to go utterly berserk now that Arkansas has passed the Human Heartbeat Protection Act. It requires that when an abortion is performed at or after the 12th week, doctors must test for a fetal heartbeat before an abortion is performed. If a heartbeat is detected, a woman cannot have an abortion, except in cases of rape, incest, or if a mother‚Äôs life is in danger.
This is common-sense stuff. The human heartbeat has long been indisputable proof of life both within and without the womb.
Still, and not surprisingly, even as the state legislature was overriding the Democratic governor‚Äôs veto of the new law ‚Äď SB 134 ‚Äď the ACLU and other pro-abort radicals were vowing to challenge it in court.
Mathews Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel, has vowed to preserve it: ‚ÄúIf asked, Liberty Counsel will defend this law without reservation, free of charge for the people of Arkansas, born and unborn,‚ÄĚ he said.
‚ÄúIn keeping with medical advances, history and common sense, the Arkansas legislature has said that the life of a 12-week-old unborn child with a detectable heartbeat is protected under the law.‚ÄĚ
And well it should be. SB 134 is just the beginning. Brave lawmakers in Arkansas have provided the template for other states to follow.
They‚Äôre on the right side of history.
Indeed, history has a way of repeating itself. The Roe decision was not the first time the U.S. Supreme Court has so disgraced our nation. Roe v. Wade represents the twin bookend to the Court‚Äôs shameful 1857 Dred Scott decision.
In Dred Scott the Court absurdly held that African-American slaves, even if emancipated, were not fully persons and therefore could never be considered U.S. citizens. Likewise, Roe v. Wade ruled that children in gestation are not fully persons and are therefore not entitled to their most basic civil right: life.
As with Dred Scott, Roe‚Äôs fate, I believe, is certain. It‚Äôs just a matter of time. History will eventually judge Roe v. Wade every bit as harshly as Dred Scott.
Call yourself ‚Äúpro-choice‚ÄĚ? Shame on you. You‚Äôre no better than a modern-day slave master. Dump the garbage and join the right side of history.
There‚Äôs plenty of room over here.