Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Current Events & Hot Topics Current Events & Hot Topics

Why does America lose its head over 'terror' but ignore its daily gun deaths?

Posted by   + Show Post



Why does America lose its head over 'terror' but ignore its daily gun deaths?

The marathon bombs triggered a reaction that is at odds with last week's inertia over arms control

A man chooses a gun at the Gun Gallery i
A man chooses a gun at the Gun Gallery in Glendale, California. Photograph: Gabriel Bouys/AFP/Getty Images

The thriving metropolis of Boston was turned into a ghost town on Friday. Nearly a million Bostonians were asked to stay in their homes – and willingly complied. Schools were closed; business shuttered; trains, subways and roads were empty; usually busy streets eerily resembled a post-apocalyptic movie set; even baseball games and cultural events were cancelled – all in response to a 19-year-old fugitive, who was on foot and clearly identified by the news media.

The actions allegedly committed by the Boston marathon bomber, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and his brother, Tamerlan, were heinous. Four people dead and more than 100 wounded, some with shredded and amputated limbs.

But Londoners, who endured IRA terror for years, might be forgiven for thinking that America over-reacted just a tad to the goings-on in Boston. They're right – and then some. What we saw was a collective freak-out like few that we've seen previously in the United States. It was yet another depressing reminder that more than 11 years after 9/11 Americans still allow themselves to be easily and willingly cowed by the "threat" of terrorism.

After all, it's not as if this is the first time that homicidal killers have been on the loose in a major American city. In 2002, Washington DC was terrorised by two roving snipers, who randomly shot and killed 10 people. In February, a disgruntled police officer, Christopher Dorner, murdered four people over several days in Los Angeles. In neither case was LA or DC put on lockdown mode, perhaps because neither of these sprees was branded with that magically evocative and seemingly terrifying word for Americans, terrorism.

To be sure, public officials in Boston appeared to be acting out of an abundance of caution. And it's appropriate for Boston residents to be asked to take precautions or keep their eyes open. But by letting one fugitive terrorist shut down a major American city, Boston not only bowed to outsize and irrational fears, but sent a dangerous message to every would-be terrorist – if you want to wreak havoc in the United States, intimidate its population and disrupt public order, here's your instruction booklet.

Putting aside the economic and psychological cost, the lockdown also prevented an early capture of the alleged bomber, who was discovered after Bostonians were given the all clear and a Watertown man wandered into his backyard for a cigarette and found a bleeding terrorist on his boat.

In some regards, there is a positive spin on this – it's a reflection of how little Americans have to worry about terrorism. A population such as London during the IRA bombings or Israel during the second intifada or Baghdad, pretty much every day, becomes inured to random political violence. Americans who have such little experience of terrorism, relatively speaking, are more primed to overreact – and assume the absolute worst when it comes to the threat of a terror attack. It is as if somehow in the American imagination, every terrorist is a not just a mortal threat, but is a deadly combination of Jason Bourne and James Bond.

If only Americans reacted the same way to the actual threats that exist in their country. There's something quite fitting and ironic about the fact that the Boston freak-out happened in the same week the Senate blocked consideration of a gun control bill that would have strengthened background checks for potential buyers. Even though this reform is supported by more than 90% of Americans, and even though 56 out of 100 senators voted in favour of it, the Republican minority prevented even a vote from being held on the bill because it would have allegedly violated the second amendment rights of "law-abiding Americans".

So for those of you keeping score at home – locking down an American city: a proper reaction to the threat from one terrorist. A background check to prevent criminals or those with mental illness from purchasing guns: a dastardly attack on civil liberties. All of this would be almost darkly comic if not for the fact that more Americans will die needlessly as a result. Already, more than 30,000 Americans die in gun violence every year (compared to the 17 who died last year in terrorist attacks).

What makes US gun violence so particularly horrifying is how routine and mundane it has become. After the massacre of 20 kindergartners in an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, millions of Americans began to take greater notice of the threat from gun violence. Yet since then, the daily carnage that guns produce has continued unabated and often unnoticed.

The same day of the marathon bombing in Boston, 11 Americans were murdered by guns. The pregnant Breshauna Jackson was killed in Dallas, allegedly by her boyfriend. In Richmond, California, James Tucker III was shot and killed while riding his bicycle – assailants unknown. Nigel Hardy, a 13-year-old boy in Palmdale, California, who was being bullied in school, took his own life. He used the gun that his father kept at home. And in Brooklyn, New York, an off-duty police officer used her department-issued Glock 9mm handgun to kill herself, her boyfriend and her one-year old child.

At the same time that investigators were in the midst of a high-profile manhunt for the marathon bombers that ended on Friday evening, 38 more Americans – with little fanfare – died from gun violence. One was a 22-year old resident of Boston. They are a tiny percentage of the 3,531 Americans killed by guns in the past four months – a total that surpasses the number of Americans who died on 9/11 and is one fewer than the number of US soldiers who lost their lives in combat operations in Iraq. Yet, none of this daily violence was considered urgent enough to motivate Congress to impose a mild, commonsense restriction on gun purchasers.

It's not just firearms that produce such legislative inaction. Last week, afertiliser plant in West, Texas, which hasn't been inspected by federal regulators since 1985, exploded, killing 14 people and injuring countless others. Yet many Republicans want to cut further the funding for the agency (OSHA) that is responsible for such reviews. The vast majority of Americans die from one of four ailments – cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes and chronic lung disease – and yet Republicans have held three dozen votes to repeal Obamacare, which expands healthcare coverage to 30 million Americans.

It is a surreal and difficult-to-explain dynamic. Americans seemingly place an inordinate fear on violence that is random and unexplainable and can be blamed on "others" – jihadists, terrorists, evil-doers etc. But the lurking dangers all around us – the guns, our unhealthy diets, the workplaces that kill 14 Americans every single day – these are just accepted as part of life, the price of freedom, if you will. And so the violence goes, with more Americans dying preventable deaths. But hey, look on the bright side – we got those sons of bitches who blew up the marathon.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/apr/21/boston-marathon-bombs-us-gun-law

by on Apr. 23, 2013 at 2:10 AM
Replies (31-40):
KreatingMe
by Silver Member on Apr. 23, 2013 at 3:06 PM

I completely disagree. It can't protect us 100%, yes it fails at that because that is not possible. Your gun can't protect you 100% either. Nothing can, there will never be life without tragedies. But I think the govt does protect us. Laws protect us. Sure there are people who ignore the laws and do unlawful things anyway but if the laws didn't exist, those numbers would increase. Maybe I'm naive but I believe the govt has thwarted terror plots that we never heard of. 


Quoting smurfbitebug:

That's just it, though. Everybody wants a guarantee from their government that it will protect them.
Guess what? It can't. It won't. It may try. But it will fail. Miserably.





smurfbitebug
by on Apr. 23, 2013 at 3:34 PM

 You are assuming my comments were much more obtuse than they actually were.

What I'm saying is that the people who are afraid of guns, never handled one in their life, or never properly learned how to handle them correctly, are the ones crying for government protection from guns when in reality.. you may still be faced with a gun with anti-gun laws in place. Actually you're probably more susceptible. As the robbers who come into your house may have just been at your neighbor's house.. who used to own guns.. but thanks to people who are anti-gun, don't anymore.

So .. shooting themselves in the foot over gun laws. Awesome. But I've long ago learned that the majority of people willingly cut off their nose to spite their face.

 

Quoting KreatingMe:

I completely disagree. It can't protect us 100%, yes it fails at that because that is not possible. Your gun can't protect you 100% either. Nothing can, there will never be life without tragedies. But I think the govt does protect us. Laws protect us. Sure there are people who ignore the laws and do unlawful things anyway but if the laws didn't exist, those numbers would increase. Maybe I'm naive but I believe the govt has thwarted terror plots that we never heard of. 

 

Quoting smurfbitebug:

That's just it, though. Everybody wants a guarantee from their government that it will protect them.
Guess what? It can't. It won't. It may try. But it will fail. Miserably.


 



 

AMom29
by Gold Member on Apr. 23, 2013 at 8:56 PM
2 moms liked this

'Cause it's Am-ur-i-ca, that's why.


charleyd68
by Platinum Member on Apr. 23, 2013 at 10:20 PM

scratching my head, backing away!

kailu1835
by Ruby Member on Apr. 24, 2013 at 1:44 AM
Because gun crimes are not typically as big as acts of terror. There are, on average, 2 or 3 gum crimes (not including suicide or accidents here) per day. These crimes affect a one, maybe two people at a time and usually are not random acts of violence. Terrorist acts on the other hand, are extraordinarily violent as well as random by nature, and affect multiple people at a time, like the over 3 thousand on 9/11, or the bombing in Boston that injured over 100 people.
kailu1835
by Ruby Member on Apr. 24, 2013 at 1:45 AM
You know that more people die every day from blunt objects than from guns, right?

Quoting turtle68:

Its mundane and all so yawnable ...because guns are a right and stupid people kill themselves and others.  We live in a country with 315 million...this is a trickle, hardly a blip.  because sucide people will kill themselves with a knife anyway so lets dismiss them.  Bad people have guns so we MUST have them.  Good law abiding citizens are careful with their guns, they train their 3 year olds well and its all good that they shoot bb guns at traffic.

Remember...if they died from gun shot, its because they are bad criminal people.  Good people dont do that shit, well trained members of society dont do that shit and kids from 2 to 15yo KNOW how to be responsible with a gun, cause mommy and daddy taught them well.

Oh wait....

grandmab125
by Gold Member on Apr. 24, 2013 at 2:00 AM

 Yes, they can tell that to the over 500 murdered residents of Chicago last year.  It'll be ineteresting to watch the murder rate drop, when Illinoisans can carry conceal starting in June, I believe.  The SC threw the IL law "no conceal & carry" right out the window last fall.

It's pathetic that the admin and other anti-gun jerks are using the terrorist bombings to try to further their agenda.  One has nothing to do with the other.  But then, Obama's not beyond using any victims or others to further his own agenda.

Quoting talia-mom:

Yep.   But we have already outlawed shooting people.   Chicago has strict gun laws, so it is completely safe.

 

Quoting MsDenuninani:

 There's no right to shoot people, either.

 

Quoting talia-mom:

because there is no right to blow people up in the constitution

 

 

 

 

 

grandma B

TranquilMind
by Platinum Member on Apr. 24, 2013 at 2:48 AM

 THIS!  The same people squawking that constitutionally protected weapons should be eliminated or restricted further (even though that would not affect criminals, of course) have nothing to say about why alcohol, one of the most destructive elements we have, is legal, because in that case, they understand that some abuse it but others do not.  They can properly focus on the people there, instead of the alcohol. 

Quoting NutHouseMomma:

The same reason alcohol is legal but not an issue for discussion. Innocent people are killed all the time from the use of alcohol by another person - yet, it still is legal. **shruggs** I don't see the connection with gun debates really...there were plenty of reasons presented to flag these terrorists, but yet again the ball was dropped. Maybe they freaked out because they realized their slip up. Pretty amazing how quickly they found these guys too. I'm on to how things are being handled....sadly their game of chess is predicatable...check mate!

 

TranquilMind
by Platinum Member on Apr. 24, 2013 at 2:50 AM

 Everything about this cartoon is wrong, and the analogies do not work. 

Uncle Sam should be saying, "I'm suffering from a lack of moral values" because that is the real problem, not the inanimate instruments by which these immoral agents operate. 

Quoting AMom29:

'Cause it's Am-ur-i-ca, that's why.


 

turtle68
by Mahinaarangi on Apr. 24, 2013 at 2:54 AM

maybe they do....I know of a person who fell over and hit the side of their head on the corner of the table, a boy around the corner fell off his skateboard, got concussion fell asleep and died.  I dont doubt people die all the time from a blunt object.

How many kids find a blunt object and accidentally kill themselves?  How many stressed out mothers use a blunt object to bludgeon their kids and husband and then beat themselves to death?

Have you got numbers on them?  Im betting that the numbers arent higher than those who use a gun to meet those ends.

Too many kids DIE from guns.  No gun, no death

Quoting kailu1835:

You know that more people die every day from blunt objects than from guns, right?

Quoting turtle68:

Its mundane and all so yawnable ...because guns are a right and stupid people kill themselves and others.  We live in a country with 315 million...this is a trickle, hardly a blip.  because sucide people will kill themselves with a knife anyway so lets dismiss them.  Bad people have guns so we MUST have them.  Good law abiding citizens are careful with their guns, they train their 3 year olds well and its all good that they shoot bb guns at traffic.

Remember...if they died from gun shot, its because they are bad criminal people.  Good people dont do that shit, well trained members of society dont do that shit and kids from 2 to 15yo KNOW how to be responsible with a gun, cause mommy and daddy taught them well.

Oh wait....


Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN