Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Current Events & Hot Topics Current Events & Hot Topics

Worlds First Genetically Modified Babies Born

Posted by on May. 3, 2013 at 11:11 AM
  • 192 Replies

 

World's first GM babies born

by MICHAEL HANLON, Daily Mail

The world's first geneticallymodified humans have been created, it was revealed last night.

The disclosure that 30 healthy babies were born after a series of experiments in the United States provoked another furious debate about ethics.

So far, two of the babies have been tested and have been found to contain genes from three 'parents'.

Fifteen of the children were born in the past three years as a result of one experimental programme at the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science of St Barnabas in New Jersey.

The babies were born to women who had problems conceiving. Extra genes from a female donor were inserted into their eggs before they were fertilised in an attempt to enable them to conceive.

Genetic fingerprint tests on two one-year- old children confirm that they have inherited DNA from three adults --two women and one man.

The fact that the children have inherited the extra genes and incorporated them into their 'germline' means that they will, in turn, be able to pass them on to their own offspring.

Altering the human germline - in effect tinkering with the very make-up of our species - is a technique shunned by the vast majority of the world's scientists.

Geneticists fear that one day this method could be used to create new races of humans with extra, desired characteristics such as strength or high intelligence.

Writing in the journal Human Reproduction, the researchers, led by fertility pioneer Professor Jacques Cohen, say that this 'is the first case of human germline genetic modification resulting in normal healthy children'.

Some experts severely criticised the experiments. Lord Winston, of the Hammersmith Hospital in West London, told the BBC yesterday: 'Regarding the treat-ment of the infertile, there is no evidence that this technique is worth doing . . . I am very surprised that it was even carried out at this stage. It would certainly not be allowed in Britain.'

John Smeaton, national director of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, said: 'One has tremendous sympathy for couples who suffer infertility problems. But this seems to be a further illustration of the fact that the whole process of in vitro fertilisation as a means of conceiving babies leads to babies being regarded as objects on a production line.

'It is a further and very worrying step down the wrong road for humanity.' Professor Cohen and his colleagues diagnosed that the women were infertile because they had defects in tiny structures in their egg cells, called mitochondria.

They took eggs from donors and, using a fine needle, sucked some of the internal material - containing 'healthy' mitochondria - and injected it into eggs from the women wanting to conceive.

Because mitochondria contain genes, the babies resulting from the treatment have inherited DNA from both women. These genes can now be passed down the germline along the maternal line.

A spokesman for the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), which regulates 'assisted reproduction' technology in Britain, said that it would not license the technique here because it involved altering the germline.

Jacques Cohen is regarded as a brilliant but controversial scientist who has pushed the boundaries of assisted reproduction technologies.

He developed a technique which allows infertile men to have their own children, by injecting sperm DNA straight into the egg in the lab.

Prior to this, only infertile women were able to conceive using IVF. Last year, Professor Cohen said that his expertise would allow him to clone children --a prospect treated with horror by the mainstream scientific community.

'It would be an afternoon's work for one of my students,' he said, adding that he had been approached by 'at least three' individuals wishing to create a cloned child, but had turned down their requests.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-43767/Worlds-GM-babies-born.html#ixzz2SF6jJcqK
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Thoughts?

by on May. 3, 2013 at 11:11 AM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
Bigmetalchicken
by Silver Member on May. 3, 2013 at 11:14 AM

I wonder what they look like....

Donna6503
by Platinum Member on May. 3, 2013 at 11:15 AM
5 moms liked this
It's only the beginning. I'm sure there will be implication to this new science that haven't been thought of yet, and it will be both good and bad for our society.
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
yourspecialkid
by Platinum Member on May. 3, 2013 at 11:18 AM
28 moms liked this

 I think playing God will likely be our downfall.  Nature has a reason for denying conception.

 

 

JoshRachelsMAMA
by JRM on May. 3, 2013 at 11:20 AM
This is very star trekky
Euphoric
by Bazinga! on May. 3, 2013 at 11:21 AM

 Hmm...

simplegirl2321
by Member on May. 3, 2013 at 11:27 AM
2 moms liked this
Gattaca
TruthSeeker.
by Milami on May. 3, 2013 at 11:28 AM
1 mom liked this

 

Quoting simplegirl2321:

Gattaca

  That is exactly what I thought as well! Good movie.

TruthSeeker.
by Milami on May. 3, 2013 at 11:29 AM

 

Quoting Bigmetalchicken:

I wonder what they look like....

  Probably like any other baby.

MorganTho
by Bronze Member on May. 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM
2 moms liked this
X-men
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
simplegirl2321
by Member on May. 3, 2013 at 11:32 AM
I know love that movie. I especially thought of gattaca when the article was talking about creating a new superhuman race.

Quoting TruthSeeker.:

 


Quoting simplegirl2321:

Gattaca

  That is exactly what I thought as well! Good movie.

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)