Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Scientists discover, when pregnant, your baby is forever a part of YOUR Brain, literally!

Posted by   + Show Post
Scientists Discover Children’s Cells Living in Mothers’ Brains The connection between mother and child is ever deeper than thought By Robert ................. A living connection.......... Image: ock / Анастасия Попова........ The link between a mother and child is profound, and new research suggests a physical connection even deeper than anyone thought. The profound psychological and physical bonds shared by the mother and her child begin during gestation when the mother is everything for the developing fetus, supplying warmth and sustenance, while her heartbeat provides a soothing constant rhythm. .........The physical connection between mother and fetus is provided by the placenta, an organ, built of cells from both the mother and fetus, which serves as a conduit for the exchange of nutrients, gasses, and wastes. Cells may migrate through the placenta between the mother and the fetus, taking up residence in many organs of the body including the lung, thyroid muscle, liver, heart, kidney and skin. These may have a broad range of impacts, from tissue repair and cancer prevention to sparking immune disorders. It is remarkable that it is so common for cells from one individual to integrate into the tissues of another distinct person. We are accustomed to thinking of ourselves as singular autonomous individuals, and these foreign cells seem to belie that notion, and suggest that most people carry remnants of other individuals. As remarkable as this may be, stunning results from a new study show that cells from other individuals are also found in the brain. In this study, male cells were found in the brains of women and had been living there, in some cases, for several decades. What impact they may have had is now only a guess, but this study revealed that these cells were less common in the brains of women who had Alzheimer’s disease, suggesting they may be related to the health of the brain. We all consider our bodies to be our own unique being, so the notion that we may harbor cells from other people in our bodies seems strange. Even stranger is the thought that, although we certainly consider our actions and decisions as originating in the activity of our own individual brains, cells from other individuals are living and functioning in that complex structure. However, the mixing of cells from genetically distinct individuals is not at all uncommon. This condition is called chimerism after the fire-breathing Chimera from Greek mythology, a creature that was part serpent part lion and part goat. Naturally occurring chimeras are far less ominous though, and include such creatures as the slime mold and corals.  Microchimerism is the persistent presence of a few genetically distinct cells in an organism. This was first noticed in humans many years ago when cells containing the male “Y” chromosome were found circulating in the blood of women after pregnancy. Since these cells are genetically male, they could not have been the women’s own, but most likely came from their babies during gestation. In this new study, scientists observed that microchimeric cells are not only found circulating in the blood, they are also embedded in the brain. They examined the brains of deceased women for the presence of cells containing the male “Y” chromosome. They found such cells in more than 60 percent of the brains and in multiple brain regions. Since Alzheimer’s disease is more common in women who have had multiple pregnancies, they suspected that the number of fetal cells would be greater in women with AD compared to those who had no evidence for neurological disease. The results were precisely the opposite: there were fewer fetal-derived cells in women with Alzheimer’s. The reasons are unclear. Microchimerism most commonly results from the exchange of cells across the placenta during pregnancy, however there is also evidence that cells may be transferred from mother to infant through nursing. In addition to exchange between mother and fetus, there may be exchange of cells between twins in utero, and there is also the possibility that cells from an older sibling residing in the mother may find their way back across the placenta to a younger sibling during the latter’s gestation. Women may have microchimeric cells both from their mother as well as from their own pregnancies, and there is even evidence for competition between cells from grandmother and infant within the mother.
by on Jun. 17, 2013 at 11:59 AM
Replies (151-157):
KamWorthy
by Silver Member on Jun. 20, 2013 at 5:28 PM
Of course you're not the only one. Science is often open ended, a hypothesis, theory. take from it what you will.
Quoting ReadWriteLuv:

Ok good. I'm not the only one who finds this ridiculous.
ReadWriteLuv
by Silver Member on Jun. 20, 2013 at 5:34 PM
But the article doesn't state that it's a theory, it states it as proof. I see no actual scientific proof, I see no specifc study cited. I see no scientists or lab noted.

Quoting KamWorthy:

Of course you're not the only one. Science is often open ended, a hypothesis, theory. take from it what you will.




Quoting ReadWriteLuv:

Ok good. I'm not the only one who finds this ridiculous.
KamWorthy
by Silver Member on Jun. 20, 2013 at 5:44 PM
Well, by-golly....you're correct. So it must not be true! I mean if scientists said it, but this article doesn't prove it, then it never happened.
Quoting ReadWriteLuv:

But the article doesn't state that it's a theory, it states it as proof. I see no actual scientific proof, I see no specifc study cited. I see no scientists or lab noted.

Quoting KamWorthy:

Of course you're not the only one. Science is often open ended, a hypothesis, theory. take from it what you will.




Quoting ReadWriteLuv:

Ok good. I'm not the only one who finds this ridiculous.
Mommy4000
by Ray of sunshine on Jun. 20, 2013 at 5:48 PM

This makes complete sense and is not shocking at all.

KamWorthy
by Silver Member on Jun. 20, 2013 at 5:51 PM
But...but....but....you CANT believe this! It CAN'T make sense to you because science said it couldn't! LOL! How dare you believe unless science proves it first?
Quoting Mommy4000:

This makes complete sense and is not shocking at all.

ReadWriteLuv
by Silver Member on Jun. 20, 2013 at 6:21 PM
Ok, now you're just being melodramatic.

I simply asked for cited sources. There was a senator a month or two ago that claimed that his friend, the doctor, actually found hundreds of microscopic fully formed babies inside the wombs of women who were on birth control, he had "scientific claims" too. As far as I'm concerned without seeing the actual science behind this, no, it didn't really happen.


Quoting KamWorthy:

But...but....but....you CANT believe this! It CAN'T make sense to you because science said it couldn't! LOL! How dare you believe unless science proves it first?




Quoting Mommy4000:

This makes complete sense and is not shocking at all.

KamWorthy
by Silver Member on Jun. 20, 2013 at 6:53 PM
Ok.
Quoting ReadWriteLuv:

Ok, now you're just being melodramatic.

I simply asked for cited sources. There was a senator a month or two ago that claimed that his friend, the doctor, actually found hundreds of microscopic fully formed babies inside the wombs of women who were on birth control, he had "scientific claims" too. As far as I'm concerned without seeing the actual science behind this, no, it didn't really happen.


Quoting KamWorthy:

But...but....but....you CANT believe this! It CAN'T make sense to you because science said it couldn't! LOL! How dare you believe unless science proves it first?




Quoting Mommy4000:

This makes complete sense and is not shocking at all.

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)



Featured