Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Current Events & Hot Topics Current Events & Hot Topics

The Young Won't Buy ObamaCare

Posted by on Jun. 19, 2013 at 7:00 AM
  • 138 Replies

Jenkins: The Young Won't Buy ObamaCare

It makes scant financial sense for them to subsidize others' care.

  • By HOLMAN W. JENKINS, JR.

Columnist's name

Media outlets lately have emphasized the challenge of enticing healthy young adults to sign up for ObamaCare, "exactly the type of person insurance plans, states and the federal government are counting on to make health reform work," as the L.A. Times put it. These pieces are useful as far as they go, but miss a key point that Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito managed to convey in many fewer words during last year's Supreme Court argument on ObamaCare.

Mr. Alito pointed out that young, healthy adults today spend an average of $854 a year on health care. ObamaCare would require them to buy insurance policies expected to cost roughly $5,800. The law, then, isn't just asking them to pay for "the services that they are going to consume," he added. "The mandate is forcing these people to provide a huge subsidy to the insurance companies . . . to subsidize services that will be received by somebody else."

Since he puts it that way, why would they sign up for ObamaCare, especially since the alleged penalties will be negligible and likely unenforced?

Journalism celebrates the "five Ws" but a secret of our profession is that many of us disdain the fifth W-"why"-as if accurate analysis is somehow woolly and inferior to accurate transcription of simple facts like "who," "what," "when" and "where."

Here's another example. For 30 years, journalists have been "investigating" hospital pricing, which is neither competitive nor closely related to cost, invariably throwing up their hands and saying government must fix matters. Yet any reasoned analysis shows that government policy is why we have such a byzantine payment system in the first place, in which an ever-inflating health-care bill is allocated among "payer" groups via opaque political bargaining.

Why isn't the same mess seen in other realms of the economy? In the automobile market, dealers publish prices on their websites and in ads that are always lower than the sticker prices. Why?

Independent websites like Edmunds.com, AutoTrader.com and Kelley Blue Book publish detailed pricing information for consumers and do so for free. Why?

The answer is obvious. Consumers want such information and businesses see opportunity in providing it, even for free, in order to attract eyeballs for advertising.

Such information doesn't exist in health care because consumers don't demand it, because somebody else is almost always paying for our health care. Those of us who aren't subsidized directly by Medicaid, Medicare and the Veterans Administration are subsidized through the tax code to channel all our aches and pains through a third-party payment mill, disguised as employer-provided "insurance."

Not being able to analyze "why" also leads to all kinds of anomalous conclusions.

The uninsured are painted as the payer group getting the worst deal from the health-care system since they don't enjoy insurer discounts. But judging by the 6% of hospital costs written off as uncollectable, the uninsured are actually getting the best deal (in a sense). A 2011 government study found that even relatively affluent families pay just 37% of their hospital bills in full.

Medicare is portrayed as getting the best deal from the system because Medicare pays less per service. But remember how the system works. Who's to say Medicare doesn't pay less per procedure because it's being billed for many more procedures, because that's how providers are allowed to maximize their revenues from the payer known as Medicare?

In fact, plenty of evidence suggests this is exactly how Medicare operates. And Congress understands as much, hence the 25% cut in physician reimbursements it keeps threatening to impose is informed partly by expectations that physicians could maintain their incomes by charging for more services.

The media's refusal to accumulate any wisdom on the "whys" of our health-care system is also behind the willingness of so many to credit a recent moderation in health-care spending to ObamaCare, though that moderation began before ObamaCare was enacted.

The spending moderation is actually not dissimilar to that seen during the heyday of managed care in the 1990s and again during the 2000s as employers rolled out sharply higher deductibles, co-pays and health savings accounts. The moderation is not dissimilar to that seen in every economic downturn when companies chuck insured workers off their payrolls and fellow workers curb their health spending out of fear of losing their jobs.

Employers are stuck constantly trying to combat the inflationary forces that government policy fosters. That's our best explanation of why health-care inflation waxes and wanes, though never to the point of falling in real terms. And it's probably true now too.

If this big picture is news to you, blame the disrespect in which the fifth W is held by the media profession.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324634304578539453974685238.html?ru=yahoo?mod=yahoo_itp

by on Jun. 19, 2013 at 7:00 AM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
pvtjokerus
by Platinum Member on Jun. 19, 2013 at 7:14 AM
3 moms liked this

Very good comment: "Mr. Alito pointed out that young, healthy adults today spend an average of $854 a year on health care. ObamaCare would require them to buy insurance policies expected to cost roughly $5,800. The law, then, isn't just asking them to pay for "the services that they are going to consume," he added. "The mandate is forcing these people to provide a huge subsidy to the insurance companies . . . to subsidize services that will be received by somebody else."

prommy
by Silver Member on Jun. 19, 2013 at 7:21 AM
11 moms liked this
It's funny how these young people were all ready to hold their hands out to receive their "fair share" until they realized what the rest of us already knew...somebody has to pay for it.
Liz132
by Member on Jun. 19, 2013 at 7:22 AM
1 mom liked this

 This is so true. As a young healthy uninsured American I just can't justify spending that much on a service I don't use.

Quoting pvtjokerus:

Very good comment: "Mr. Alito pointed out that young, healthy adults today spend an average of $854 a year on health care. ObamaCare would require them to buy insurance policies expected to cost roughly $5,800. The law, then, isn't just asking them to pay for "the services that they are going to consume," he added. "The mandate is forcing these people to provide a huge subsidy to the insurance companies . . . to subsidize services that will be received by somebody else."

 

pvtjokerus
by Platinum Member on Jun. 19, 2013 at 7:27 AM
1 mom liked this

 It is going to be interesting to see how the gov will handle the penalties. My mother is the same.  She has not used HC in over 20 years and now she is going to be forced to write out a check basically for someone else.


Quoting Liz132:

 This is so true. As a young healthy uninsured American I just can't justify spending that much on a service I don't use.

Quoting pvtjokerus:

Very good comment: "Mr. Alito pointed out that young, healthy adults today spend an average of $854 a year on health care. ObamaCare would require them to buy insurance policies expected to cost roughly $5,800. The law, then, isn't just asking them to pay for "the services that they are going to consume," he added. "The mandate is forcing these people to provide a huge subsidy to the insurance companies . . . to subsidize services that will be received by somebody else."

 


 

lga1965
by on Jun. 19, 2013 at 7:37 AM
It's the ACA. And he should have backed up his claims instead of Blogging. More BS . The so called healthy young people might find themselves having to deal with catastrophic medical expenses and will end up bankrupt.
What garbage.
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
Carpy
by Ruby Member on Jun. 19, 2013 at 7:38 AM
2 moms liked this

gee, now that is a surprise.

Liz132
by Member on Jun. 19, 2013 at 7:41 AM
2 moms liked this

 When my husband and I go in once every few years for a check up and my kids are healthy enough that neither have ever had to go to in for a sick visit only "well visits." Why should I pay thousands of dollars a year when for coverage when we'd never even meet the deductible?I put a lot of effort into maintaining my families health. I've looked into cost of healthcare for us and it was almost $3,000 a month, $800 a month for basically no coverage (10,000$ deductible)! Why should our healthy family have to pay for the people who don't take care of themselves?  

Quoting pvtjokerus:

 It is going to be interesting to see how the gov will handle the penalties. My mother is the same.  She has not used HC in over 20 years and now she is going to be forced to write out a check basically for someone else.

 

Quoting Liz132:

 This is so true. As a young healthy uninsured American I just can't justify spending that much on a service I don't use.

Quoting pvtjokerus:

Very good comment: "Mr. Alito pointed out that young, healthy adults today spend an average of $854 a year on health care. ObamaCare would require them to buy insurance policies expected to cost roughly $5,800. The law, then, isn't just asking them to pay for "the services that they are going to consume," he added. "The mandate is forcing these people to provide a huge subsidy to the insurance companies . . . to subsidize services that will be received by somebody else."

 

 

 

 

lga1965
by on Jun. 19, 2013 at 7:42 AM
1 mom liked this
What about annual physicals,pap smears,mammograms,etc ? If you're wealthy you can pay for your expenses without health care ..... What about average or poor people ?
Those who think they don't need health care are in denial. And who says we pay for others ? Silly. Even so, I care what happens to others. I'll help if that's the case.
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
Roxygurl
by Bronze Member on Jun. 19, 2013 at 7:42 AM
2 moms liked this
I see health care as a good thing. I'm 30 and in fairly good health but I've never once lapsed on coverage and since I was 25 I've had to buy my own since my job doesn't offer insurance. I look at the worst case scenario, I end up in the hospital and if I have no insurance I go bankrupt trying to pay the bills or I have insurance and while I'd still be responsible for a portion of the bill it will be a much smaller portion than if I was uninsured.

I don't understand the mentality that if you're healthy and young health care is an unnecessary expense.
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
pvtjokerus
by Platinum Member on Jun. 19, 2013 at 7:53 AM

 Very good point.  I think we have all been brain washed into the "what if" scenario and the "I must have this" mentality.


Quoting Liz132:

 When my husband and I go in once every few years for a check up and my kids are healthy enough that neither have ever had to go to in for a sick visit only "well visits." Why should I pay thousands of dollars a year when for coverage when we'd never even meet the deductible?I put a lot of effort into maintaining my families health. I've looked into cost of healthcare for us and it was almost $3,000 a month, $800 a month for basically no coverage (10,000$ deductible)! Why should our healthy family have to pay for the people who don't take care of themselves?  

Quoting pvtjokerus:

 It is going to be interesting to see how the gov will handle the penalties. My mother is the same.  She has not used HC in over 20 years and now she is going to be forced to write out a check basically for someone else.

 

Quoting Liz132:

 This is so true. As a young healthy uninsured American I just can't justify spending that much on a service I don't use.

Quoting pvtjokerus:

Very good comment: "Mr. Alito pointed out that young, healthy adults today spend an average of $854 a year on health care. ObamaCare would require them to buy insurance policies expected to cost roughly $5,800. The law, then, isn't just asking them to pay for "the services that they are going to consume," he added. "The mandate is forcing these people to provide a huge subsidy to the insurance companies . . . to subsidize services that will be received by somebody else."

 

 

 

 


 

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)