Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Current Events & Hot Topics Current Events & Hot Topics

If Women Are Allowed to Marry Each Other They Will Enslave Men

Posted by on Aug. 26, 2013 at 8:56 AM
  • 25 Replies


If Women Are Allowed to Marry Each Other They Will Enslave Men, Says Columnist David R. Usher

article image

Anti-gay columnist and president of The Council for Marriage Policy (CMP) David R. Usher issued a warning on Friday that if same sex marriage becomes legal across the country, lesbians will trick gay and straight men into having sex with them, so that they can conceive children, then they will turn those men into economic slaves. He predicted that straight, single mothers will also begin marrying women in order to “double-up” on child support and further enslave men.

Usher’s column, titled “Our last chance to save traditional marriage,” he claims the Supreme Court created three classes of marriage when it struck down the Defense of Marriage Act.

The first is the “Mother-mother” marriage between two women.

“Most women will bear children by men outside the marriage – often by pretending they are using birth control when they are not. Entrapped men become economically-conscripted third parties to these marriages, but get nothing in return,” Usher predicts.

Their children will become the responsibility of “taxpayers.”

Furthermore, he said same sex marriage will be a viable path for straight, single mothers.

“This is a significant advantage compelling women who would otherwise become (or are) single mothers to choose to marry a woman instead of a man,” Usher wrote. “They can combine incomes, double-up on tax-free child support and welfare benefits, decrease costs, and double the human resources available to raise children and run their household. They are sexually liberated with boyfriends often cohabiting with them to provide additional undeclared income and human resources without worrying about what happens when they break up with their boyfriends.”

The second class, Usher posited, is heterosexual marriage. He said opposite sex partners almost always support their marriage “without governmental involvement,” such as food stamps or welfare, but they will be at a disavantage next to the tax-evading Class 1 marriage.

“Traditional marriages will be economically-disadvantaged compared to mother-mother marriages because they cannot draw large incomes from the welfare state and they will be taxed to support other marriages,” he said.

But no one has it worse, Usher said, than the third class, male-male marriages.

“Marriages between two men are destined to be the marital underclass. In most cases, these men will become un-consenting ‘fathers’ by reproductive entrapment,” Usher wrote. “Men in male-male marriages who become fathers by deceptive means will be forced to pay child support to women in bi-maternal marriages, and become economically enslaved to Class-1 marriages.”

Usher, who believes the LGBTQ community is highly promiscuous, spreading HIV, and causing a “national health crisis.”

“Medical science has documented the fact that homosexual behavior is a great health and social risk to everyone,” Usher wrote. “There is no evidence that gay marriage reduces the extremely high rates of promiscuity commonly practiced by homosexuals and bisexuals.”

by on Aug. 26, 2013 at 8:56 AM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
Sekirei
by Nari Trickster on Aug. 26, 2013 at 8:58 AM
3 moms liked this

-grabs collar and whips-

illinoismommy83
by Bronze Member on Aug. 26, 2013 at 8:59 AM
2 moms liked this

Wow. Just wow.

He figured us out. We all plan to have 23 kids with random men, collect child support from all of them, then collect welfare while doing "lesbian things" with our wife all day.

SuperChicken
by on Aug. 26, 2013 at 9:00 AM
3 moms liked this

Wow.  He does make marrying a woman sounds good.  Double the income, foodstamps,  and a man slave?   Can't argue with that. 

Clairwil
by Ruby Member on Aug. 26, 2013 at 9:03 AM
1 mom liked this
Quoting IhartU:

“This is a significant advantage compelling women who would otherwise become (or are) single mothers to choose to marry a woman instead of a man,” Usher wrote. “They can combine incomes, double-up on tax-free child support and welfare benefits, decrease costs, and double the human resources available to raise children and run their household.

Wouldn't the same advantages of combining incomes apply to two women who chose to live together without getting married?

In fact, don't courts sometimes reduce the child support being granted to a single women if she marries again, on the theory that her new husband will now help raise the child?   Wouldn't the same apply if she married again to a female wage earner?

Clairwil
by Ruby Member on Aug. 26, 2013 at 9:06 AM
Quoting IhartU:

Usher  believes the LGBTQ community is highly promiscuous

Would that be an argument in favour of encouraging them into monogamous married relationships?


momtoscott
by Platinum Member on Aug. 26, 2013 at 9:07 AM
2 moms liked this

My goodness, this man is afraid of women.  Makes me wonder about his mom.  

Rhodin
by Bronze Member on Aug. 26, 2013 at 9:08 AM
So, I should divorce DH and marry my SIL? Make lesbian polygamy legal an I'll never have to drive to visit relatives, again.
mamav2215
by Member on Aug. 26, 2013 at 9:10 AM
1 mom liked this

bahahahahaha did this man just admit that his fellow men are incapable of thinking with their brain and not their penis?

kjc143
by New Member on Aug. 26, 2013 at 9:10 AM

Well, if THIS isn't reaching....  Funny though.

annabl1970
by Platinum Member on Aug. 26, 2013 at 9:12 AM
He read too much about Amazons:)
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN