Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Obama Administration Releases Health Care Exchange Enrollee Figures

Posted by on Oct. 20, 2013 at 1:28 PM
  • 86 Replies

Half-million Obamacare applications filed so far: Report

Administration officials say about 476,000 health insurance applications have been filed through federal and state exchanges, the most detailed measure yet of the problem-plagued rollout of President Barack Obama's signature legislation.

However, the officials continue to refuse to say how many people have actually enrolled in the insurance markets. Without enrollment figures, it's unclear whether the program is on track to reach the 7 million people projecting by the Congressional Budget Office to gain coverage during the six-month sign-up period.

Obama's advisers say the president has been frustrated by the flawed rollout. During one of his daily health care briefings last week, he told advisers assembled in the Oval Office that the administration had to own up to the fact that there were no excuses for not having the website ready to operate as promised.

The president is expected to address the problems on Monday during a health care event at the White House. Cabinet members and other top administration officials will also be traveling around the country in the coming weeks to encourage sign-ups in areas with the highest population of uninsured people.

The first three weeks of sign-ups have been marred by a cascade of computer problems, which the administration says it is working around the clock to correct. The rough rollout has been a glaring embarrassment for Obama, who invested significant time and political capital in getting the law passed during his first term.

The officials said technology experts from inside and outside the government are set to work on the glitches, though they did not say how many workers were being added.

Officials did say staffing has been increased at call centers by about 50 percent. As problems persist on the federally run website, the administration is encouraging more people to sign up for insurance over the phone.

The officials did not want to be cited by name and would not discuss the health insurance rollout unless they were granted anonymity.

Despite the widespread problems, the Obama administration has yet to fully explain what went wrong with the online system consumers were supposed to use to sign up for coverage.

Initially, administration officials blamed a high volume of interest for the frozen screens that many people encountered. Since then, the administration has also acknowledged unspecified problems with software and some elements of the system's design.

Interest in the insurance markets appears to continue to be high. Officials said about 19 million people had visited HealthCare.gov as of Friday night.

People seeking insurance must fill out applications before selecting specific plans. The applications include personal information, including income figures that are used to calculate any subsidies the applicant may qualify for.

More than one person can be included on an application.

Of the 476,000 applications that have been started, just over half have been from the 36 states where the federal government is taking the lead in running the markets. The rest of the applications have come from the 14 states running their own markets, along with Washington, D.C.

The White House says it plans to release the first enrollment totals from both the federal and state-run markets in mid-November.

An internal memo obtained by The Associated Press showed that the administration projected nearly a half-million people would enroll for the insurance markets during the first month.

Officials say they expect enrollments to be heavier toward the end of the six-month sign-up window.

In an ironic twist, the problems with the rollout were overshadowed by Republican efforts to get changes to the health care law in exchange for funding the government. That effort failed and the government reopened last week with the health care law intact.

Stung by that defeat, some Republicans are now calling for the resignation of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. The White House says it has complete confidence in her.

House Republicans have scheduled a hearing next week to look into the rollout problems, a hearing Sebelius will not attend, citing schedule conflicts. White House allies say they're confident the problems are being addressed.

"There's no question the marketplace website needs some improvement," said Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., one of the architects of the law. "The administration needs to fix the computer bugs and I'm confident that they're working around the clock to fix the problems."

by on Oct. 20, 2013 at 1:28 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
thetrollcat
by iluv2meow on Oct. 20, 2013 at 1:48 PM

oh goodie tax increase!

cjsbmom
by Lois Lane on Oct. 20, 2013 at 1:52 PM
1 mom liked this


Quoting thetrollcat:

oh goodie tax increase!

Don't say that too loudly, or the squirrels in your yard will start committing hari-kari again. 

thetrollcat
by iluv2meow on Oct. 20, 2013 at 1:53 PM

we haz rabbits, turkeys and deer back here....

Quoting cjsbmom:


Quoting thetrollcat:

oh goodie tax increase!

Don't say that too loudly, or the squirrels in your yard will start committing hari-kari again. 


.Bubbles.
by Silver Member on Oct. 20, 2013 at 1:53 PM
1 mom liked this
Whoever rolled out the site without proper testing should be fired. I have heard nothing but how bad the user experience has been.
cjsbmom
by Lois Lane on Oct. 20, 2013 at 1:54 PM

The turkeys will freak out. They're shifty, edgy creatures to begin with....

Quoting thetrollcat:

we haz rabbits, turkeys and deer back here....

Quoting cjsbmom:


Quoting thetrollcat:

oh goodie tax increase!

Don't say that too loudly, or the squirrels in your yard will start committing hari-kari again. 



cjsbmom
by Lois Lane on Oct. 20, 2013 at 1:55 PM


Quoting .Bubbles.:

Whoever rolled out the site without proper testing should be fired. I have heard nothing but how bad the user experience has been.

There are definitely a lot of bugs. Unfortunately, sometimes those can't be discovered until software goes live. 


thetrollcat
by iluv2meow on Oct. 20, 2013 at 1:56 PM
1 mom liked this

well yes but, they probably didnt test it on the server/live and yes you are suppose to TEST again once it hits the server before you actually link it to be LIVE. I think they skipped a lot of testing on that software.

Quoting cjsbmom:


Quoting .Bubbles.:

Whoever rolled out the site without proper testing should be fired. I have heard nothing but how bad the user experience has been.

There are definitely a lot of bugs. Unfortunately, sometimes those can't be discovered until software goes live. 



cjsbmom
by Lois Lane on Oct. 20, 2013 at 1:58 PM
1 mom liked this

DH is a software programmer, and his theory is that the programmers were rushed to complete the project before it was truly finished and all the kinks worked out. He said that happens a lot in the business. Managers who have never programmed a day in their life want it done and done now and don't care about the actual process, just meeting a predetermined deadline. 

Quoting thetrollcat:

well yes but, they probably didnt test it on the server/live and yes you are suppose to TEST again once it hits the server before you actually link it to be LIVE. I think they skipped a lot of testing on that software.

Quoting cjsbmom:


Quoting .Bubbles.:

Whoever rolled out the site without proper testing should be fired. I have heard nothing but how bad the user experience has been.

There are definitely a lot of bugs. Unfortunately, sometimes those can't be discovered until software goes live. 




thetrollcat
by iluv2meow on Oct. 20, 2013 at 2:01 PM

I build websites but that doesnt limit that I am not a software designer, I do server end programming... So ya Im pretty familiar with ONLINE server software development. Like I said, Im sure the whole thing was quickly designed and the testing was skipped. From my experience, what works on a local server dealing with server end softwares, sometimes behaves differently once you put it on the server. This is why I said they probably failed to test it on the server as well.

Quoting cjsbmom:

DH is a software programmer, and his theory is that the programmers were rushed to complete the project before it was truly finished and all the kinks worked out. He said that happens a lot in the business. Managers who have never programmed a day in their life want it done and done now and don't care about the actual process, just meeting a predetermined deadline. 

Quoting thetrollcat:

well yes but, they probably didnt test it on the server/live and yes you are suppose to TEST again once it hits the server before you actually link it to be LIVE. I think they skipped a lot of testing on that software.

Quoting cjsbmom:


Quoting .Bubbles.:

Whoever rolled out the site without proper testing should be fired. I have heard nothing but how bad the user experience has been.

There are definitely a lot of bugs. Unfortunately, sometimes those can't be discovered until software goes live. 





.Bubbles.
by Silver Member on Oct. 20, 2013 at 2:01 PM
I work for the .com division of a large corpoation that deals with high traffic on certain days due to launch shoes and limited product. I realize some issues were bound to happen, but the number of issues they had was avoidable. I'm not blaming anyone specific, but the site should have never launched the way it did.

Quoting cjsbmom:


Quoting .Bubbles.:

Whoever rolled out the site without proper testing should be fired. I have heard nothing but how bad the user experience has been.

There are definitely a lot of bugs. Unfortunately, sometimes those can't be discovered until software goes live. 


Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)



Featured