Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Current Events & Hot Topics Current Events & Hot Topics

As food labels get closer look, ingredients vanish

Posted by on Dec. 18, 2013 at 10:58 AM
  • 18 Replies
1 mom liked this

NEW YORK (AP) — Take another look at that food label. An ingredient or two may have vanished.

As Americans pay closer attention to what they eat, food and beverage companies are learning that unfamiliar ingredients can invite criticism from online petitions and bloggers. The risk of damaging publicity has proven serious enough that some manufacturers have reformulated top-selling products to remove mysterious, unpronounceable components that could draw suspicion.

Earlier this year, for example, PepsiCo Inc. said it would stop using brominated vegetable oil in Gatorade and find a another way to evenly distribute color in the sports drink. Last year, Starbucks said it would stop using a red dye made of crushed bugs based on comments it received "through a variety of means," including an online petition, and switch to a tomato-based extract. Kraft Foods plans to replace artificial dyes with colors derived from natural spices in select varieties of its macaroni and cheese, a nod to the feedback it's hearing from parents.

Ali Dibadj, a Bernstein analyst who covers the packaged food and beverage industry, says the changes reflect a shift from "democratization to activism" by consumers.

"It used to be that people would just decide not to buy the product. Now they're actually agitating for change," Dibadj said. "There's a bullhorn — which is the Internet — so you can get a lot of people involved very quickly."

Companies stand by the safety of their old recipes. Although they don't typically provide details on production decisions, their reasons for using certain ingredients can include cost and manufacturing efficiencies.

Still, food and beverage makers can be sensitive about broadcasting any changes. Chick-fil-A, for instance, has been removing artificial dyes and high-fructose corn syrup from its dressings and sauces. The Atlanta-based chain is also testing a "clean ingredient bun" but has not alerted customers.

"The reason companies don't publicize it is that they don't want to bring attention to these ingredients. They want to slowly start to remove them until they're all gone," said Vani Hari, who runs the site FoodBabe.com and has pressured companies to remove artificial dyes and other ingredients.

There are no numbers tracking how many companies are reformulating products in response to consumer demand. But even if recipe changes aren't in direct response to petitions or blogs, executives understand that ingredients can become a liability once they fall out of favor with the public.

High-fructose corn syrup, for example, has gained a negative image in recent years and has been blamed for fueling bad eating habits. The Center for Science in the Public Interest, a health advocacy group, says the sweetener is no more harmful than ordinary sugar in large amounts. But Kroger Co. decided to remove it from store-brand cereals following surveys with consumers in 2011.

The supermarket chain isn't alone. Over the past decade, the use of high-fructose corn syrup in packaged foods and drinks has fallen 18 percent to 6.1 million tons last year, according to market researcher Euromonitor International.

The latest moves to swap out ingredients underscore the growing sway consumers have through sites such as Change.org, which lets people post petitions.

In the past, a customer complaint about an ingredient may have been addressed with a boilerplate letter from corporate headquarters. But now people can go online to share their concerns with thousands of like-minded individuals.

John Boeheim, of New York's Hudson Valley, says he avoids a number of ingredients, including the artificial sweetener aspartame and a red dye, in part because of what he's read on blogs and social media.

"We've taught our kids to look at the labels, to look at the ingredients," Boeheim said.

Companies are paying attention too. Chick-fil-A says it will continue to improve ingredients to keep up with changing tastes and even invited Hari to spend the day at its headquarters sharing her concerns.

Not all companies are making changes, at least not right away. The Mississippi teenager who called for the removal of brominated vegetable oil in Gatorade, for instance, is now taking aim at Coca-Cola's Powerade, which also contains the ingredient in select varieties. As of Tuesday, Sarah Kavanagh's petition had more than 57,000 supporters.

In a statement, Coca-Cola noted that all its ingredients comply with regulations. But the company also said it is "always looking for ways to evolve" its formulas.

Another petition that asks Mars Inc. to remove artificial colors from M&Ms had more than 141,000 signatures. In an emailed statement, the privately held company stressed the safety of its ingredients.

Although it has not announced any changes, the company noted that it continues to explore the use of naturally sourced colors and that it is "constantly evaluating" its ingredients based on a variety of factors, including consumer preference.

by on Dec. 18, 2013 at 10:58 AM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
Sisteract
by Whoopie on Dec. 18, 2013 at 11:03 AM
2 moms liked this

The creed in US food production has been to add things that no other industrialized country adds. WHY? Other countries have stated that since they do not know the potential outcomes of adding things like HFCS or pulverized proteins to food sources, they will not permit the practices- The attitude in the US has been, since we do not know the outcomes, let's add the products and see what happens. 

As a people, we are hosed in this country-

NWP
by guerrilla girl on Dec. 18, 2013 at 11:12 AM
4 moms liked this
And this is why Monsanto and Kraft fight food labeling laws with millions of dollars.
Sisteract
by Whoopie on Dec. 18, 2013 at 11:21 AM

The US is owned by Corporations- they run and control EVERYTHING.

"Corporations are people my friends"- MR.

Can you imagine that being the leader of the free world?
 

UpSheRises
by Platinum Member on Dec. 18, 2013 at 11:24 AM
1 mom liked this

 

Quoting NWP: And this is why Monsanto and Kraft fight food labeling laws with millions of dollars.

 Billions.

Sisteract
by Whoopie on Dec. 18, 2013 at 11:25 AM

Now I am angry, OP.

Many want to claim the US as the greatest nation on Earth. 

Would the greatest nation on Earth put profit before people? Purposely add non- nutritive items, for no good rea$on to food products? Contaminate water supplies? Deny needed health screenings and treatments? 

Nothing before the mighty buck....Citizens, who cares.

Greatest Nation? 



UpSheRises
by Platinum Member on Dec. 18, 2013 at 11:33 AM

 

Quoting Sisteract:

Now I am angry, OP.

Many want to claim the US as the greatest nation on Earth. 

Would the greatest nation on Earth put profit before people? Purposely add non- nutritive items, for no good rea$on to food products? Contaminate water supplies? Deny needed health screenings and treatments? 

Nothing before the mighty buck....Citizens, who cares.

Greatest Nation? 

 


 You've gotta watch this.

The Fuckit Point

Sisteract
by Whoopie on Dec. 18, 2013 at 12:20 PM
1 mom liked this

Lots to think about.

I kept waiting for my daughter's voice to be in one of the segments.

Denial and apathy- at a loss for a solution.

Quoting UpSheRises:


Quoting Sisteract:

Now I am angry, OP.

Many want to claim the US as the greatest nation on Earth. 

Would the greatest nation on Earth put profit before people? Purposely add non- nutritive items, for no good rea$on to food products? Contaminate water supplies? Deny needed health screenings and treatments? 

Nothing before the mighty buck....Citizens, who cares.

Greatest Nation? 



 You've gotta watch this.

The Fuckit Point


AdrianneHill
by Platinum Member on Dec. 18, 2013 at 12:22 PM
1 mom liked this
Dude, I.know. I'm sorry. It sucks. Some stuff is just too bleak.

Quoting UpSheRises:

 


Quoting Sisteract:

Now I am angry, OP.


Many want to claim the US as the greatest nation on Earth. 


Would the greatest nation on Earth put profit before people? Purposely add non- nutritive items, for no good rea$on to food products? Contaminate water supplies? Deny needed health screenings and treatments? 


Nothing before the mighty buck....Citizens, who cares.


Greatest Nation? 


 




 You've gotta watch this.


The Fuckit Point

NWP
by guerrilla girl on Dec. 18, 2013 at 12:31 PM
I see some promise in this article. Id we stand up and demand accountability in food labeling then companies will adjust their products because people DO care. The worst case scenario is that we get the labeling changed and people don't adjust their shopping. This post indicated a positive shift.

Quoting Sisteract:

Now I am angry, OP.

Many want to claim the US as the greatest nation on Earth. 

Would the greatest nation on Earth put profit before people? Purposely add non- nutritive items, for no good rea$on to food products? Contaminate water supplies? Deny needed health screenings and treatments? 

Nothing before the mighty buck....Citizens, who cares.

Greatest Nation? 



Sisteract
by Whoopie on Dec. 18, 2013 at 1:27 PM

It's the why behind the approach that P*sses me off. WHY is the US so backazzwards when it comes to real protections of what/WHO is important? It always comes down to dollars and the approach lacks common sense...the PIC always have to be forced to make the right decisions.

Yes, this post indicated a positive- We are now approaching global baseline in some areas of food labeling- Yippee.

ETA- and food adulteration

Quoting NWP: I see some promise in this article. Id we stand up and demand accountability in food labeling then companies will adjust their products because people DO care. The worst case scenario is that we get the labeling changed and people don't adjust their shopping. This post indicated a positive shift.

Quoting Sisteract:

Now I am angry, OP.

Many want to claim the US as the greatest nation on Earth. 

Would the greatest nation on Earth put profit before people? Purposely add non- nutritive items, for no good rea$on to food products? Contaminate water supplies? Deny needed health screenings and treatments? 

Nothing before the mighty buck....Citizens, who cares.

Greatest Nation? 




Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN