Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Current Events & Hot Topics Current Events & Hot Topics

Texas Father Barred from Taking Pregnant Wife Off Life Support

Posted by   + Show Post

 I find this repugnant.  This law absolutely reduces a woman to no more than a forced incubator.


On Nov. 26, Erick Munoz woke to the sound of his year-old son crying and found his 14-weeks-pregnant wife, Marlise, lying on the kitchen floor, blue in the face and without a pulse. A firefighter and paramedic, Munoz called 911 and performed CPR, to no avail. When they arrived at the John Peter Smith Hospital (JPS) in Fort Worth, Texas, he thought he would have to make an agonizing decision: refuse life support even though that meant losing both his wife and his future child. Munoz said in a WFAA News report that four years ago, when Marlise's brother was killed in an accident, she told him that she would never want to be on life support — something they had discussed many times since.

More on Yahoo: Family Fights to Save Teen Daughter on Life Support

A month later, against his requests, she is still on a ventilator. Not only does Munoz want to honor his wife's wishes, but also he believes that the fetus she is carrying has been seriously harmed. "I don't know how long she was there prior to me finding her," he said. Munoz, who could not be reached for comment, wrote on WFAA's Facebook page, "All I know is that she was without oxygen long enough for her to have massive brain swelling. I unfortunately know what that type of damage could do to a child during crucial developmental time." Doctors say it's likely that Munoz's wife suffered a pulmonary embolism, and no longer has brain activity.

More on Yahoo: Doctors Vary on Willingness to Talk Hospice

When Munoz first arrived at the hospital, he discovered that, according to Texas law, life-sustaining procedures may not be withheld or withdrawn from a pregnant woman, — even if she has an advance health care directive (also called a living will) stipulating that she does not want to be kept alive on a machine. There are conflicting reports about whether Marlise Munoz had an official DNR (Do Not Resuscitate order), and the family could not be reached for comment. But according to the Center for Women Policy Studies, as of 2012, Texas and 11 other states have automatically invalidated pregnant women's advance directives to refrain from using extraordinary measures to keep them alive, and others have slightly less restrictive but similar laws. A spokesperson from the hospital told Yahoo Shine, "Our responsibility is to be a good corporate citizen while also providing quality care for our patients. At all times, JPS will follow the law as it applies to healthcare in the state of Texas."

Marlise Munoz's mother and father say they support their son-in-law's request to take their daughter off life support. "She absolutely DID NOT EVER want to be connected to Life Support," her mother, Lynne Machado, wrote on WFAA's Facebook page. "This issue is not about Pro Choice/Pro Life. Our intent is purely one of education about how this [statute] null and voids any woman's DNR [if she is] pregnant. We know our daughter well enough, after numerous discussions about DNR, that she would NEVER EVER consent to being hooked up to Life Support." While the family's tragic situation hits a nerve in a state where abortion debates rage, Munoz also said he doesn't want to participate in arguments over right-to-life verses pro-choice issues, but instead wishes to honor his wife and inform the public about a little-known law.

Marlise Munoz, at approximately 18 weeks pregnant, remains unresponsive and her husband describes her as "simply a shell." Doctors check the fetal heartbeat daily, but Munoz doesn't think the testing is sufficient to measure the fetus's viability. "Its hard to reach the point where you would wish your wife's body would stop," he said.

http://shine.yahoo.com/parenting/texas-father-barred-taking-pregnant-wife-off-life-200600388.html

by on Dec. 20, 2013 at 9:11 PM
Replies (11-20):
angelenia
by Silver Member on Dec. 20, 2013 at 10:28 PM
:(
Sisteract
by Whoopie on Dec. 20, 2013 at 10:37 PM
11 moms liked this

The state of TX should be liable for all medical costs incurred and for any and all special medical needs that this fetus might incur.

yourspecialkid
by Platinum Member on Dec. 20, 2013 at 10:38 PM
1 mom liked this

 What a sad story.  I think he should be able to take her off life support.

 

JakeandEmmasMom
by Platinum Member on Dec. 20, 2013 at 10:49 PM
That's just wrong.
Posted on CafeMom Mobile
DestinyHLewis
by Destiny on Dec. 20, 2013 at 10:54 PM
1 mom liked this

Yet again awful news. 

LauraKW
by "Dude!" on Dec. 21, 2013 at 12:50 AM
1 mom liked this
Even a legally notarized DNR is disregarded for this Incubator Law.

Quoting .Bubbles.: This woman has a right to have her wishes followed through on. To be treated as nothing more than an incubator is disgusting and dehumanizing. The state has no right to override the wishes of her husband especially when her parents are saying he is only following her wishes.
AdrianneHill
by Platinum Member on Dec. 21, 2013 at 1:35 AM
1 mom liked this
Why do they hate the babies?! They're so MEEAANN!! :: collapses, sobbing and cradling my fetus doll keychain:: It's ok it's ok.

Quoting Woodbabe:

*beats breasts* All that matters is the unborn.... *sob*

Quoting parentalrights1: *falls on knees*



THINK OF THE CHILDRENNNNNN!



Quoting Saphira1207:

Ummm ....  This is supposed to be sarcasm, yes?  O.o

Quoting parentalrights1: Women are no longer people with their own feelings when they get pregnant. All that matters is the fetus



VinVanMom
by Bronze Member on Dec. 21, 2013 at 1:38 AM
4 moms liked this
She might have felt differently pregnant. I wouldn't want life support under normal circumstances but if my baby could live I'd want it to. She isn't bring harmed. He doesn't want up deal w a special needs child.
Mommabearbergh
by on Dec. 21, 2013 at 1:42 AM
3 moms liked this
A special needs child with two parents is hard but one parent its especially hard. Having a forever child isn't for everyone

Quoting VinVanMom: She might have felt differently pregnant. I wouldn't want life support under normal circumstances but if my baby could live I'd want it to. She isn't bring harmed. He doesn't want up deal w a special needs child.
VinVanMom
by Bronze Member on Dec. 21, 2013 at 1:43 AM
Adoption might be a good choice got the father

Quoting Mommabearbergh: A special needs child with two parents is hard but one parent its especially hard. Having a forever child isn't for everyone



Quoting VinVanMom: She might have felt differently pregnant. I wouldn't want life support under normal circumstances but if my baby could live I'd want it to. She isn't bring harmed. He doesn't want up deal w a special needs child.
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

close Join now to connect to
other members!
Connect with Facebook or Sign Up Using Email

Already Joined? LOG IN