Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Supreme Court Agrees To Hear Wisconsin Gerrymandering Case

Posted by on Jun. 19, 2017 at 3:03 PM
  • 11 Replies

Supreme Court Agrees To Hear Wisconsin Gerrymandering Case

The Supreme Court has not ruled on "purely partisan gerrymanders," which means drawing voting districts with the aim of strengthening one political party, since 2004.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to take up an appeal over electoral districts in Wisconsin after a lower court ruled that the state's Republican-drawn map constitutes an "unconstitutional partisan gerrymander."

It's the first time in more than a decade that the nation's highest court will take up the issue of partisan gerrymandering, or drawing voting districts with the aim of strengthening one political party.

The Supreme Court has weighed in on the issue of race and congressional district-drawing, most recently last month when it rejected two North Carolina districts, as The Two-Way reported.

But the court has not ruled on "purely partisan gerrymanders" since 2004, as NPR's Nina Totenberg reported:

"In 2004, a four-member Supreme Court plurality all but ruled out challenges to even extreme partisan gerrymanders, while four members of the court would have allowed some limited challenges. Justice Anthony Kennedy cast the fifth and deciding vote, declaring that he might someday embrace a challenge to a partisan gerrymander if someone could come up with workable standards."

The defendants in this case, Gill v. Whitford, claim to have come up with such a standard. Here's how Shawn Johnson of Wisconsin Public Radio explained it:

"The metric that they came up with they called the efficiency gap, and it measures what they call wasted votes. Let's say you have a strongly Democratic district. And if a Democrat got a lot of votes there, but they only get one seat, they're saying that they wasted a lot of votes to get those seats. If Democrats come up just short in a lot of other districts, they're saying they wasted those votes as well.

"So they compare that district-by-district to the statewide total, and that gives them this efficiency gap measure. And by that metric, plaintiffs looked back at redistricting plans throughout the U.S., going back to 1972, and Wisconsin's redistricting plan was one of the most strongly political gerrymandered in history."

Last November, a panel of federal judges ruled against the state's electoral district map, which was drawn by Republican lawmakers after the 2010 census. As Johnson said, then-President Barack Obama did well in the state when he was re-elected in 2012, and "yet Democrats gained no seats in the Legislature, remained deeply in the minority."

Wendy Weiser from New York University's Brennan Center for Justice said in a statement Monday that "gerrymandering has become so aggressive, extreme, and effective that there is an urgent need for the Supreme Court to finally step in and set boundaries."

Supporters of Wisconsin's map say that "the election results it produced are similar to those under earlier court-drawn maps," as The Associated Press reports.

The lower court's ruling "ordered new maps drawn in time for the 2018 elections," the wire service adds. And "that work is proceeding."

Nasty Woman Power


by on Jun. 19, 2017 at 3:03 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
LGAll65215
by on Jun. 19, 2017 at 3:06 PM
Good .
Next they need to go to North Carolina and correct things there.
NWP
by guerrilla girl on Jun. 19, 2017 at 3:13 PM
1 mom liked this

"The Supreme Court has weighed in on the issue of race and congressional district-drawing, most recently last month when it rejected two North Carolina districts, as The Two-Way reported."

Quoting LGAll65215: Good . Next they need to go to North Carolina and correct things there.


Nasty Woman Power


UnoDuoTres
by Gold Member on Jun. 19, 2017 at 3:18 PM

I don't hold out any hope that the current court will seek to preserve democracy, rather I suspect they will act to entrench the already severe and worsening Republican gerrymandering.

LGAll65215
by on Jun. 19, 2017 at 3:20 PM
Cool
Thanks.


Quoting NWP:

"The Supreme Court has weighed in on the issue of race and congressional district-drawing, most recently last month when it rejected two North Carolina districts, as The Two-Way reported."

Quoting LGAll65215: Good .
Next they need to go to North Carolina and correct things there.

LGAll65215
by on Jun. 19, 2017 at 3:21 PM
Well that's very discouraging.

Quoting UnoDuoTres:

I don't hold out any hope that the current court will seek to preserve democracy, rather I suspect they will act to entrench the already severe and worsening Republican gerrymandering.

NWP
by guerrilla girl on Jun. 19, 2017 at 3:23 PM
1 mom liked this

I am very curious to see the outcome of this case and to see if all three of our branches are putting party over people or if at least our judicial branch cares about democracy.

Quoting UnoDuoTres:

I don't hold out any hope that the current court will seek to preserve democracy, rather I suspect they will act to entrench the already severe and worsening Republican gerrymandering.


Nasty Woman Power


ILive4This
by Robin on Jun. 19, 2017 at 4:18 PM
1 mom liked this

We'll see. With the addition of Gorsuch, it doesn't seem promising.

Gerrymandering, voter suppression, etc, etc....it's no surprise Republicans are in power.

NWP
by guerrilla girl on Jun. 19, 2017 at 4:25 PM

I don't know about that for sure. So far, nothing has changed much on the balance of the courts since he replaced an ultra conservative judge. So we will still see the same swing vote possibilities as we had under Obama. Maybe they will do the right thing.

Quoting ILive4This:

We'll see. With the addition of Gorsuch, it doesn't seem promising.

Gerrymandering, voter suppression, etc, etc....it's no surprise Republicans are in power.


Nasty Woman Power


LGAll65215
by on Jun. 19, 2017 at 9:54 PM
That's true, unfortunately.


Quoting ILive4This:

We'll see. With the addition of Gorsuch, it doesn't seem promising.

Gerrymandering, voter suppression, etc, etc....it's no surprise Republicans are in power.

joyful.noise
by on Jun. 19, 2017 at 9:59 PM
1 mom liked this

This is a super visual about gerrymandering:

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)