Welcome to CafeMom
join our community and talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

We won't show your age or birthday to anyone unless you want us to!

A battle I choose to pick: Obama breaks Promise on Posting Legislation

Posted by on Mar. 25, 2009 at 12:04 PM
  • 11 Replies

(CNN) -- Whether by omission or commission, both the White House and Congress get a dose of blame for not living up to the new era of transparency promised by President Obama.

The president's old campaign Web site still has this commitment there for all to see:

"As president, Obama will not sign any nonemergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House Web site for five days."

Well, the president broke that promise barely a week after taking office when he signed the Lilly Ledbetter Bill dealing with equal pay for men and women.

A good bill, and certainly one that could have survived a five-day comment period. So, maybe the White House folks just forgot?

But then there is Congress and the Stimulus Bill. How fast could you get through it?

According to the nonpartisan Sunlight Foundation, lawmakers had just 13 hours to read 1,100 pages of material that would cost the American taxpayer $787 billion.

That's less than a minute and a half per page, with no time for bathroom breaks. No wonder so many of our lawmakers didn't seem to notice that last-minute exemption clearing the way for bailed-out companies like AIG to pay out big bonuses.

So, the House tried to clean up the mess last week by rushing through another bill -- a tax on AIG bonuses. That bill was just 11 hours old before it went on the floor to be argued and then quickly approved.

And the list goes on well before the president took office.

The bank bailout got all of 29 hours, the rescue of Fannie and Freddie was only available for 19 hours. This is how bills could literally become, to borrow a phrase, too big to fail -- and too fast to stop.

advertisement

The Sunlight Foundation is calling on Congress to allow the American people three days, 72 hours, to read a nonemergency bill online before debate begins. We strongly agree.

And yes lawmakers, you can have three days to read it over, too, before taking a stand. As for President Obama's promise of a five-day public review once a bill leaves Capitol Hill headed for his desk, it would be nice if he kept his word on this going forward.

Posted by on Mar. 25, 2009 at 12:04 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies:
PamR
by Pam on Mar. 25, 2009 at 12:13 PM

I would like to see this, too.

Katie911
by on Mar. 25, 2009 at 12:18 PM

Every time I even give my opinion on Obama I get ripped.  So I will just say lay off already.  I hate the guy, but I sooooooo sick of listening to people bitch about him.

PamR
by Pam on Mar. 25, 2009 at 12:19 PM

I love him - I voted for him - but I would like to see this happen.

anxiousschk
by anxiouss on Mar. 25, 2009 at 12:31 PM

See..in the teleprompter post, I pointed out that there are battles that need to be picked.

Same thing with the special olympics post.

I don't believe it's fair or appropriate to go off about every little thing...it makes NO sense.  The man is human. 

However, I think it is perfectly reasonable and acceptable to look at campagin promises and see how those are coming to pass thus far. 

We know what a catastrophe it was to rush through the massive bailout bill.....even with that being labeled "emergency legislation"...why would it have been wrong to request 5 days?


 

Quoting Katie911:

Every time I even give my opinion on Obama I get ripped.  So I will just say lay off already.  I hate the guy, but I sooooooo sick of listening to people bitch about him.


sweetie00
by on Mar. 25, 2009 at 3:22 PM

ditto

Quoting PamR:

I love him - I voted for him - but I would like to see this happen.


realtorshelly
by on Mar. 25, 2009 at 3:26 PM

 Transparency would be nice...

1bluediamond
by Gold Member on Mar. 25, 2009 at 3:27 PM

bow down

Quoting anxiousschk:

See..in the teleprompter post, I pointed out that there are battles that need to be picked.

Same thing with the special olympics post.

I don't believe it's fair or appropriate to go off about every little thing...it makes NO sense.  The man is human. 

However, I think it is perfectly reasonable and acceptable to look at campagin promises and see how those are coming to pass thus far. 

We know what a catastrophe it was to rush through the massive bailout bill.....even with that being labeled "emergency legislation"...why would it have been wrong to request 5 days?


 

Quoting Katie911:

Every time I even give my opinion on Obama I get ripped.  So I will just say lay off already.  I hate the guy, but I sooooooo sick of listening to people bitch about him.

 

I did vote for him and do respect him. However I completely respect your point of you. It's refreshing to find someone who is reasonable.

SunandMoonMom
by Member on Mar. 25, 2009 at 4:22 PM

"We know what a catastrophe it was to rush through the massive bailout bill.....even with that being labeled "emergency legislation"...why would it have been wrong to request 5 days?"

I completely agree; I think five days (at least) could have made the American Public at least feel more involved and respected.  However, I wonder if five days would have been enough time for any changes to be made if a majority of Americans contacted Congress?

anxiousschk
by anxiouss on Mar. 25, 2009 at 7:48 PM

Probably not....but at least *maybe* Congress would have read the thing before they signed it :) 

Quoting SunandMoonMom:

"We know what a catastrophe it was to rush through the massive bailout bill.....even with that being labeled "emergency legislation"...why would it have been wrong to request 5 days?"

I completely agree; I think five days (at least) could have made the American Public at least feel more involved and respected.  However, I wonder if five days would have been enough time for any changes to be made if a majority of Americans contacted Congress?


hsteele
by on Mar. 26, 2009 at 1:54 AM

Agreed. The question is does the white house consider these emergency bills? But you are right. These aren't the first things that have gone through unannounced. Lets just hope maybe enough of an outcry will be heard so that this gets fixed for future bills.

Quoting anxiousschk:

See..in the teleprompter post, I pointed out that there are battles that need to be picked.

Same thing with the special olympics post.

I don't believe it's fair or appropriate to go off about every little thing...it makes NO sense.  The man is human. 

However, I think it is perfectly reasonable and acceptable to look at campagin promises and see how those are coming to pass thus far. 

We know what a catastrophe it was to rush through the massive bailout bill.....even with that being labeled "emergency legislation"...why would it have been wrong to request 5 days?


 

Quoting Katie911:

Every time I even give my opinion on Obama I get ripped.  So I will just say lay off already.  I hate the guy, but I sooooooo sick of listening to people bitch about him.



Heather

Proud Pagan Mama

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin~

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Welcome to CafeMom
join our community and talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

We won't show your age or birthday to anyone unless you want us to!


Featured