Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)

Shreveport Citizens Disarmed By Police for 2nd Amendment Bumper Stickers

Posted by on Jul. 7, 2009 at 3:08 PM
  • 12 Replies
Argue With Everyone
July 7, 2009 (Infowars)


Welcome to Shreveport: Your rights are now suspended.According to Cedric Glover, mayor of Shreveport, Louisiana, his cops “have a power that [. . .] the President of these Unites States does not have”: His cops can take away your rights.

And would you like to guess which rights he has in mind?

Just ask Shreveport resident Robert Baillio, who got pulled over for having two pro-gun bumper stickers on the back of his truck — and had his gun confiscated.

While the officer who pulled him over says Baillio failed to use his turn signal, the only questions he had for Baillio concerned guns: Whether he had a gun, where the gun was, and if he was a member of the NRA. No requests for a driver’s licence, proof of insurance, or vehicle registration — and no discussion of a turn signal.

Accordingly, Baillio told the officer the truth, which led the police officer to search his car without permission and confiscate his gun.

However, not only does Louisiana law allow resident to drive with loaded weapons in their vehicles, but Mr. Baillio possessed a concealed carry license!

What does such behavior demonstrate, other than transparent political profiling — going so far as to use the infamous Department of Homeland Security report on “Americans of a rightwing persuasion” as a how-to guidebook, no less?

Mr. Baillio made no secret of his political affiliations: An American flag centers a wide flourish of pro-freedom stickers and decals on his back windshield.

In fact, when Baillio asked the officer if everyone he pulls over gets the same treatment, the officer said no and pointed to the back of his truck.

Baillio phoned Mayor Glover to complain about this “suspension of rights” only to find that his city’s morbidly obese “commander in chief” was elated at the story: According to Glover, Baillio got “served well, protected well, and even got a consideration that maybe [he] should not have gotten.”

Thankfully, Mr. Baillio recorded a good bit of that phone call. You can watch a video with the transcriptions here. I’ve reproduced a chunk of the call below:

Baillio: (in the context of being asked about the presence of a gun) Well, I answered that question honestly, and he disarmed me.

Glover: Which would be an appropriate and proper action, sir. The fact that you gave the correct answer — it simply means that you did what it is you were supposed to have done, and that is to give that weapon to the police officer so he could appropriately place it in a place where it would not be a threat to you, to him, or to anyone in the general public.

Glover: My direction to you is that, had you chosen not to properly identify the fact that you had a weapon and directed that officer to where that weapon was located; had you been taken from the vehicle, and the officer, in the interest of his safety, chose to secure you in a safe position, and then looked, found, and determined that you did, in fact, have a weapon…then, sir, you would have faced additional, [inaudible], and more severe criminal sanctions.

Baillio: So what you’re saying is: I give up all my rights to keep and bear arms if I’m stopped by the police: Is that correct?

Glover: Sir, you have no right, when you have been pulled over by a police officer for a potential criminal offense [which would be what?! - DB] to stand there with your weapon at your side in your hand [Baillio's weapon was nowhere near his side or his hand, and Glover knew that. -- DB] because of your second amendment rights, sir. That does not mean at that point your second amendment right has been taken away; it means at that particular point in time, it has been suspended.

——————————————————————————————-
Will Grigg from ProLibertate, an excellent freedom blog, has this to say:

According to Glover, a police officer may properly disarm any civilian at any time, and the civilian’s duty is to surrender his gun — willingly, readily, cheerfully, without cavil or question.
From Glover’s perspective, it is only when firearms are in the hands of people other than the state’s uniformed enforcers/oppressors that they constitute a threat, not only to the public and those in charge of exercising official violence but also to the private gun owner himself.
NAGR spoke with Mr. Baillio, and he told us that he’s in the process of securing the official procedures and codes for firearm handling and private property confiscation for the Shreveport police department.

So far, the city has been half-heartedly cooperating with him.

“I felt sick,” Baillio told NAGR. “My uncles didn’t die for this country so I could surrender my rights like a wimp. I felt terrible. I was just thinking of all that my family has done for freedom in this nation — including dying — and here they are disarming me at a traffic stop.”

What to do?
1. Read Luke’s commentary here, and participate in the discussion by leaving a comment.
2. Send this around. This kind of behavior cannot go unchecked.
3. Call Mayor Glover’s office to complain: (318) 673-5050.

I’ll leave you with one last consideration. As a licensed firearms instructor in charge of a hundred different students every month, I’m often asked if citizens should voluntarily inform police officers of the presence of a firearm during a routine traffic stop.

While different states have different laws, my answer for Colorado citizens is an emphatic “No”: Colorado law doesn’t require you to volunteer that kind of information, and this case in Louisiana proves why, if at all possible, you should never invite trouble by doing so.

In liberty,
signature
Dudley Brown
Executive Director
National Association for Gun Rights


Call me a conspiracy theorist
by on Jul. 7, 2009 at 3:08 PM
Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Replies (1-10):
MrsRStewart
by Bronze Member on Jul. 7, 2009 at 3:14 PM

I am not for suing much, but this is a case that needs to be fought.  The only problem is in every case, it depends on what judge you get,  You get a conservative judge, you win the case.  You get a liberal judge, your case doesn't even get heard.  It is sad. 


a wedding website

Talee
by Gold Member on Jul. 7, 2009 at 3:15 PM

 Do you have a link? I would like to send this article to someone...

iluvmommyhood58
by Bronze Member on Jul. 7, 2009 at 3:17 PM
Quoting Talee:

 Do you have a link? I would like to send this article to someone...





Didn't link it but here's the address...



http://www.infowars.com/shreveport-citizens-disarmed-by-police-for-2nd-amendment-bumper-stickers/
Happy2bMom09
by New Member on Jul. 7, 2009 at 3:21 PM

Are you forgetting about that thing called a jury? 


 

Quoting MrsRStewart:

I am not for suing much, but this is a case that needs to be fought.  The only problem is in every case, it depends on what judge you get,  You get a conservative judge, you win the case.  You get a liberal judge, your case doesn't even get heard.  It is sad. 


mrs_khan07
by Silver Member on Jul. 7, 2009 at 3:29 PM

Thank you for posting this. This is why we left Louisiana. We lived pretty close to Shreveport. There are a lot of horror stories about I-10 and that is just where our horror story took place. We got pulled over on a cold night (as cold as it gets in Louisiana but it was pretty cold) for a swerving to miss a car that cut us off from the on-ramp. Why didn't they pull those guys over?

It started as simple questions and turned into accusations. We had driven to Houston that night to have dinner, it's about 2 hours from where we lived. My husband had the day off and we wanted to have dinner. Apparently that is a crime because who in their right mind would drive 2 hours for dinner? Well, us. We like to travel, we hadn't been to Houston. They were very suspicious of this and literally ripped our car apart. My son was about 7 months old and they left all the doors open (hatchback) and wouldn't even allow me to cover him with a blanket. He was screaming in the car and they wouldn't let me touch him for at least 30 mintues, just in case I was concealing weapons in his diaper. They even reached into his diaper to check.

Finally they let us go and told us whatever we were up to we better stop and that they would find out. We commited the crime of driving on I-10. Anyone who lives in that area should avoid I-10 at all costs. Even if you have nothing to hide, they will make you feel like you do. They will strip you of your rights. This is a huge problem that needs to be cleaned up.

Mrs. Khan

margroc
by on Jul. 7, 2009 at 3:59 PM

Am I crazy?  If I were a police officer and pulled someone over I would definitely take their gun - if the story had been about a police officer being shot by someone he pulled over for no turn signal what would your reaction be then?

awooding
by on Jul. 7, 2009 at 4:02 PM

On what grounds?

Quoting margroc:

Am I crazy?  If I were a police officer and pulled someone over I would definitely take their gun - if the story had been about a police officer being shot by someone he pulled over for no turn signal what would your reaction be then?



lilyrose73
by on Jul. 7, 2009 at 4:07 PM


Quoting margroc:

Am I crazy?  If I were a police officer and pulled someone over I would definitely take their gun - if the story had been about a police officer being shot by someone he pulled over for no turn signal what would your reaction be then?


According to Louisiana law, it is LEGAL to drive with a loaded weapon in you car... LEGAL... If you're a cop you can't just pick and chose which laws you want to enforce...and merely having the gun in your car is not gounds to confiscate it.

Champions find a way... Losers find an excuse

margroc
by on Jul. 7, 2009 at 4:11 PM

Okay, chill out!  I'm not from the south, I'm not even from the States.  So this is all foreign to me.  I will say that I certainly want to be a police officer and pull someone over for anything if there is a chance I may get shot.  Sure, this guy was okay, but there are a lot of people out there who aren't.

Stefanie1085
by Silver Member on Jul. 7, 2009 at 4:26 PM


Quoting margroc:

Okay, chill out!  I'm not from the south, I'm not even from the States.  So this is all foreign to me.  I will say that I certainly want to be a police officer and pull someone over for anything if there is a chance I may get shot.  Sure, this guy was okay, but there are a lot of people out there who aren't.


I am pretty sure I understand what you are saying. But that means that anoyone who has a gun in their vehicle- which is legal in the state of Louisiana- should have it confiscated? They could just go around pulling everyone over and taking their guns using "hey, better safe than sorry" as their excuse. I know about LA cops, living on the TX side of the border and driving on I-10 regularly. I-10 in LA is notorious for the renegade cops that will pull anybody over for anything. So there is a problem here IMO

Add your quick reply below:
You must be a member to reply to this post.
Join the Meeting Place for Moms!
Talk to other moms, share advice, and have fun!

(minimum 6 characters)



Featured