-
America's Burden
- Nov 3, 2008 at 8:02 PM
- By
- Comments (35) Total Views (1296) Everyone can see this journal post.
Saw this posted in the comment section on a different site:
"Americans are not sheep. They are not like Europeans who collectively behave in a manner in which the elite-made machine dictates. Americans do not allow impassable class structures to form. This is one manifestation of why Americans resist, mightily, being told what to do.
We're condemned to lead.
No matter which presidential candidate we choose tomorrow, his decisions to act or not to act will determine not only the safety of our country but the future of the world.
Allies and non-aligned states kick and complain, but expect us to make their boo-boos go away. Ignore the nonsense about America's (oft-predicted and yet to be witnessed) decline: We remain the indispensable power.
When we act, we'll be called a bully. When we fail to act, we'll be mocked as weak. No president can enduringly please foreign powers and populations. Our might - which remains unparalleled - was resented, is resented and will be resented. That's human nature.
Nor will we ever have the luxury of withdrawing from the world. If we tried, the world would simply come to us - as it did on 9/11. It's always better to act abroad than to wait to be acted upon at home. And we'll always be stuck with the dirty jobs - our international coworkers just want to collect their disability checks.
Consider the failures of the "world community" in cases when a strained Bush administration shrugged off a leadership role: As an endless civil war in Congo killed millions, the United Nations sent a few thousand military welfare recipients with pea-shooters. Rape and slaughter drag on as you read.
Ditto for Darfur. Zimbabwe starves as a tyrant fakes negotiations (the opium of the chattering classes). Russia invades its neighbors, murders dissidents and sells its newest weapons to rogue regimes. China commits ecogenocide against its own people. (Our allies prefer to criticize the United States.) Iran yearns for a nuclear Armageddon. Peace in Lebanon? Baloney.
The greatest danger to the United States and the world isn't from a president who does too much, but from one who does too little - or one who believes that words substitute for deeds. There are times when we must act, and damn the torpedoes.
For our part, we, the people, must accept that we'll never be loved by every last person. Jealousy is far too powerful an emotion. If we expect thanks, we'll always be disappointed. We must back our presidents when they do what is right, even if the world does not applaud.
For all that, we're not nearly as "hated" as our Left would have you believe. Anti-Americanism was far worse in the 1950s and '60s than over the past eight years. The 1970s seethed with Yankee-go-home sentiments (as I saw first-hand). And American power was supposed to be finished at the end of the Vietnam War. It's just that today's irresponsible media amplify every negative event.
Convincing themselves that President Bush spoiled a fairy tale, American leftists forget how gruesome fairy tales really are. When no one takes on the wicked witch, she wins. Sometimes, she wins anyway.
The recent efforts of President Nicolas Sarkozy of France to galvanize the European Union to fill the current leadership vacuum only underscore Washington's indispensability. The boldest leader the old world has produced since Margaret Thatcher could not unite Europeans to buttress their economies in this crisis - nor could he convince the European Union to muster a few thousand troops to save a few million lives in Congo.
To whom should the world then turn? To the Russians? The Chinese? The Taliban?
An American president too anxious to please the world is bound to do it great harm. Should the American electorate choose Sen. Barack Obama tomorrow, his first challenge will be deciding which groups of his supporters he'll disappoint first. The struggle against Islamist fanaticism will continue to demand costly, long-term commitments - it isn't a problem we can solve by sending in the San Francisco Police Department.
Without our military leadership, our allies would restrict themselves to defense in the global terror emergency. And you can't win on defense. Nature may abhor a vacuum, but terrorists love one. The demand for disciplined, capable men and women in American uniforms is only going to increase (while economic problems and campaign promises will threaten defense budgets). In this horribly troubled world, our troops remain the ultimate foreign aid. Only they protect us from global darkness.
All the conflict-resolution theories in the world aren't worth a single rifleman with an American flag on his sleeve. Aggressors won't be stopped with earnest petitions, and terrorists don't cower at repartee. As Jimmy Carter learned so very painfully, good will is no substitute for strength.
This is from my friend Ari in Australia:
"Are you one of those people who think that all the evils in the world exist because America came to dominate a world that Britain once dominated, both countries inflicting their cultural/economic/political/religious/legal system on the rest of the world?
Do you assume the world would be a better, safer, happier world if America and the rest of the western nations didn't exist? Do you assume that terrorism exists because of the "evil" American government and its policies?
Or do you think that all governments/societies/cultures/religions in every country are corrupt and at fault for the situation in the world today (which, by the way, is really not that different from the world a few thousand years ago. I am certain there was someone who thought exactly the same things of the Romans/Greeks/Egyptians/Persians, those evil conquering societies).
I want to know why it is only Western nations, and particularly America, that must justify their policies and histories, and the rest of the world has suffered under the yoke of such histories and policies and are entirely blameless.
I have said several times in other posts here that as far as I am concerned America should say "Stuff you" to the rest of the world and become isolationist and spend all the money it spends on foreign aid at home taking care of its own. I will say it again....how long do you think it would take for the rest of the world to be screaming for America to come and save it economically, militarily, medically? I would give it 6 months.
Let Europe do it all, they seem to think somehow that they would do a better job! Let China find other markets for its cheap produce, let Mexico and South America go it alone and close the border off so tight not even a fly could get through. You cross the border you will be shot! Send all the illegal immigrants home, more jobs for Americans, and give them no option. Take the job or starve to death! Let the Middle East destroy itself, let the Arabs try to stay rich without Americans buying oil.
Does anyone think America would be better off if it just said "The rest of the world hates us, so the rest of the world is on its own. We look after our own and we deport anyone who does not assimilate and tow the line. Got a whinge? then go back where you came from and survive. Don't like interference? fine, we stay out." How long would the rest of the world take to start screaming for American aid?"
Comments:
Yet ANOTHER great post! Voted popular!!!
Wow, this is really good. I never thought about it like this. Our Ancestors worked their butts off for this country. We are NOT like other countries, we are unique. We have every reason to be proud.
Great post. God Bless America.
thank you. voted popular
EXCELLENT....as we've COME TO EXPECT ...thanks Shari...
P
Exellent post Shari! Thank you!
...but O is the "hip" choice....
I guess I'm too old to be hip.
Voting popular and for McCain/Palin :o)
Great post~
I'm a young 23 with a brain and use the common sense God give me and already voted for McCain/Palin!
Already a member? Click here to log in
Videos
Bio-Identical Hormones and Synthetic Hormones - Suzanne Somers Breaking Through
Suzanne Somers Breaking Through
Suzanne Somers talks to her gynecologist Dr. Prudence Hall, and Dr. Abe Morgentaler [author of 'Testosterone for Life'] about synthetic hormones, bio-identical hormones, and how these hormones affect our bodies in different ways. Bio-identical hormones can be incredibly helpful in treating, and potentially eliminating, the many side effects of menopause. Find out more in this episode, and don't forget to subscribe to see a new episode of Suzanne Somers Breaking Through every Thursday!
Watch More Videos from CafeMom Studios ››
voted popular!
- Omayra_M
Message Friend Invite