Helping to define energies. (Part 1)

[xxhazeldovexx]

Helping to define energies:

I'm doing a study to help others better understand the energies around us, in hopes they will use this information, to further their studies, and to help further science.  I do so in hopes that by pushing such studies, we will be able to one day, put to rest, religious arguments, and to help either prove or disprove religion.  Not only will this study help other's look for more objective evidence, but it will also help US better understand ourselves, and how energies effect, not only us, but our world, and universe.

Religion, be the key reason I got involved in trying to understand these energies, is why I will start of with religion. The key problem with religion is that there really is nothing but subjective evidence, to try to prove who is right and who is wrong, if anyone.  We can't base our findings on subjective evidence alone.  If we do, we are dependent upon an observer's limited perception.  If we had to take all religions to a court case to try to fight over what is right and what is wrong, our case would be thrown out because we only have circumstantial evidence (subjective evidence). 

In order to further a case about religion, we would need to have objective evidence. To find objective evidence, we have to be dependent upon external, UNBIASED measurements, equally obtainable by ALL.  This is the problem.  We have a lot of theories, based on historical evidence we have found, but these findings only draw theories on how this can connect to the overall story behind it.  Compelling as it may be, the minute the theory can be disproved, it becomes nothing more than subjective evidence, thus unusable. A great principle example of this, is Occam's Razor: In order to define a fact, assume as little as possible.

"If a viewpoint, religious or otherwise, is correct and true, then it should stand up to any and all scrutiny and criticism.  After all, the truth can not be unseated."- J.P. Warren.