The great letter the NAA wrote to the CDC

[widespreadpanic]

Dear Centers for Disease Control,

If we’re anti-vaccine, then you must be anti-safety.

Because the fact is, we are pro-vaccine-schedule-that-is-thoughtful-and-safe-and-uses-common-sense.

So it’s more accurate to call us anti-toxic-vaccination-schedule-that-hasn’t-been-tested-for-cumulative-safety.

And since we’re parents who actually vaccinated our children (abundantly) only to watch them regress, and you continue to advocate for toxins to stay in vaccines, that would mean we’re pro-safety and you’re pro-dangerous.

Or would it be, we’re anti-dangerous and you’re anti-safety?

Wait, maybe it’s we’re anti pro-toxins and you’re pro anti-toxin? No, we’re pro-positive-change and you’re pro-hide-behind-the-parents-are-crazy-and-anti-vaccine-angle?

Better yet, we’re pro-asking questions and you’re pro-dodging them?

More like we’re anti-BS and you’re pro-see-how-many-people-will-keep-buying it?
(We may have a winner.)

Instead of calling parents “anti-vaccine” to deflect from the real issue of vaccine safety, how about advocating for our children’s health? For years you have tried to keep toxins in vaccines, and you fail to discourage flu shots that still contain the full amount of mercury from being given to pregnant women and infants. Wow, we should get thousands of people to start calling you anti-safety (since that really is what you seem to be). HOW MUCH LONGER, CDC, before you advocate for safe vaccinations?

We’re waiting.

[MommyJanice44]

Sep. 10, 2009 at 12:26 AM

.  

[Apple1]

Sep. 10, 2009 at 12:33 AM

I agree with Jancie, this post ROCKS momma!!!!!  Thanks for posting Kelly :)

[Apple1]

Sep. 10, 2009 at 12:34 AM

Ps.  Voted most popular post :)

[NoNonsenseMama]

Sep. 10, 2009 at 11:53 PM

Nice!