Thoughts, Articles, & Info

On Birth, Pregnancy, and Parenting

As a mother who has had two cesarean sections, and someone who deeply works in the birth community, the rising numbers of cesarean sections across the country, as well as across the state of Connecticut is deeply concerning. Not just as someone who is educated about this, not just as a mother who hopes to have more children some day (and not be forced to have unnecessary surgery), but it is also becoming concerning to maternity care providers nationwide.

This morning I read an article in one of my favorite parenting magazines, Mothering. It was about the state of birth in the United States and the lack of access to real education, information, and providers who will attend a Vaginal Birth after a Cesarean Section, also better known as VBAC.  Numerous studies, publications, and scientific evidence have proven VBAC to be safer than elective repeat cesarean sections, which is really a no-brainer. Cesarean sections are major abdominal surgery which any surgery carries risks. There are some cases in which the risk of the procedure is out weighted by the medical need for the procedure, but certainly not at the numbers we are seeing them today. Connecticut currently holds a 34.6% cesarean section birth rate. Meaning when you step foot inside a hospital to give birth to your child, your risk for a cesarean birth is 1 out of every 3 women that steps foot in that hospital, some hospitals in the state have up to 45% cesarean rates making your risk go up even higher.

In some hospitals across our state, there are something called VBAC Bans. Hospitals that will simply not accept any woman who is planning or wanting to have a vaginal birth after a cesarean section. Meaning, either these women need to travel out of their area, opt for a birth at home, or consent to a repeat cesarean which they have no desire or need for.  Why is this all so alarming?   Below is a quote I took from the article about this subject in Mothering Magazine…

In 2002, 26.1 percent of US women gave birth by cesarean. The majority of these were elective repeat operations and first cesareans for dystocia, or failure of labor to progress, a highly variable diagnosis. The cesarean rate is the highest ever for this country. Eighteen percent of women had a primary cesarean, a rate also unprecedented.2 Of concern is the fact that young women between the ages of 18 and 24 have the highest number of first cesareans.3 A cesarean rate of no more than 15 percent is recommended by the World Health Organization,4 and a goal of the US National Health Service is a cesarean rate of 15 percent for first-time mothers by the year 2010.5

What stands out the most is the fact that after studying, running statistics, surveying, researching, and publishing reports, The World Health Organizations states for a country of our status, there should not be a cesarean birth rate over 15% and we are OVER double that number at this point in time.  Why again is this so concerning? In my opinion, and again this is just my personal opinion. I am not a Doctor, I am not a medical professional, I do not work as a medical professional in any capacity at all. I am simply a mother, who has extensively researched this, for the health and well being of myself, and my children.  I do not believe that women are fully being informed of their risks or even learning how serious this surgery truly is. It is the most popular surgery among women today, women electing to have cesarean’s with their first pregnancies, women electing to have major abdominal surgery for no medical reason in the thousands of elective repeat cesarean’s that are taking place today. Why? It completely boggles my mind. As a parent, I can simply not wrap my head around electing to put myself, and my baby at risk for no valid reason.

Below is another quote taken from the very well written and educational Mothering article.

Dangers for the Mother: Although cesarean section is safer than ever before, it is still major abdominal surgery with inherent risks. A woman who has one cesarean will always be at risk for a uterine rupture in a subsequent pregnancy, whether she labors for a VBAC or has an elective repeat cesarean delivery.With one prior uterine scar, the risk of a uterine rupture is 1 in 500, compared to 1 in 10,000 for a woman without a cesarean scar. Each additional cesarean increases that risk. Postoperative complications include risk of injury to other organs (2 percent), hemorrhage (1 to 6 percent of women will need a blood transfusion), blood clots in the legs (0.06 to 2 percent), pulmonary embolism (0.01 to 2 percent), infection (up to 50 times higher), and complications from anesthesia. A woman is four times as likely to have a placenta previa (low-lying placenta) in her next pregnancy, putting her at risk for miscarriage, bleeding during pregnancy and labor, placental abruption, and premature delivery. One birth by cesarean puts a mother at 10 times the risk for placenta accreta (placenta grows into or through the uterus), for which women often require a hysterectomy to stop the hemorrhaging. The incidence of placenta accreta has increased tenfold in the last 50 years.

A US study found that mothers are four times more likely to die from a cesarean unrelated to health problems, compared with women who have vaginal births.

These are not small risks, they are not minor complications, and some of the impacts on the infant can become lifelong issues especially with the increased risk for healthy-baby-applebreathing problems in cesarean born infants.  These are not things I am making up, I simply am not sugar coating them like some women would prefer that people do. I knew going into the birth of my second child that having a VBAC was important, not only to me, but to my child, while that plan did not work out, he got several benefits of  attempting a VBAC.  One being, he came when he was ready. Had I scheduled a repeat cesarean, he may have been born prematurely given I had been given two different due dates. One sooner than the other.  The March of Dimes has also spoke out against elective cesareans before 39 weeks gestation because of the great risk for a baby that is simply not ready to join the world.

One thing that many women neglect to talk about is the emotional impact of a cesarean section on the mother. In the months after I had my first child via cesarean I heard a lot of “Just be happy you have a healthy baby”  of course I am happy that I have a healthy baby, but that doesn’t change the fact that many women do feel negatively about their birth experience, and even in some cases they are traumatized.

No, this does not only happen in women who have had surgical deliveries, but it is so prominent in the cases of cesarean sections that there is an international organization that aids these women in their recovery, and offers them an amazing support system for their recovery, and future births. ICAN also known as The International Cesarean Awareness Network.  If there was no need for this group, it would not exist, nor would it have thousands of members internationally. But people do not want to really understand that there are negatives of the large number of cesarean sections taking place today.  Another great quote from the Mothering Article reads….

Emotional Scars of Cesareans: Personal accounts from women who have had a cesarean, as well as emerging research, suggest that despite a healthy baby and a timely physical recovery, some women experience cesarean birth as a traumatic event. An unanticipated cesarean is more likely to increase the risk for postpartum depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). As in other traumatic human experiences, the symptoms of birth-related PTSD may emerge weeks, months, or years after the event.9–11 Women re-experience the birth and the emotions associated with it in dreams or thought intrusions. They avoid places or people that remind them of the event. Some mothers have difficulty relating to their infants, and some will avoid sexual contact that may result in pregnancy. They will also exhibit symptoms of hyperarousal, such as difficulty sleeping or concentrating, irritability, and an excessive startle response. Untreated post-traumatic stress often leads to clinical depression.12

A traumatic birth of any kind can leave a woman feeling disempowered, violated, or betrayed. Unless she has had the opportunity to process the event, in her next pregnancy a woman who has no way of controlling what she perceives as events that are likely to reoccur will sometimes choose to repeat a cesarean with a known physician in a more controlled environment.

It is comforting today to see the emotional impacts of this surgery, and the experiences being addressed in such a large scale publication. In my time working with ICAN and running the chapter here in the state of Connecticut, I have been contacted by numbers of women who are in need of a shoulder to cry on, someone who understands when they say they hated their birth experience, someone to talk to about them not connecting with their newborn like they feel they should, someone to just listen. If you think that all these women are ok, you are wrong.

Sure there are thousands that just go on with their lives, and there are thousands who know their cesarean was medically necessary for one reason or another, like I experienced with my second cesarean, which I fully knew was necessary. But believe me, out of the circles of women you may know, there is at least one that is hurting from her experience, but is ashamed, scared, or intimidated to share how she really feels for the fear of the oh so common, “Just be glad you have a healthy baby” because that is hurtful.

Until you have walked in someone elses shoes, you should always think twice about what you have to say about their personal experience. That goes especially to those who have never had children, or had a cesarean section.

Sorry for being kind of long today.

Add A Comment

Comments:

wiles...
Oct. 13, 2009 at 3:30 PM

clapping

Message Friend Invite

Mary229
Oct. 13, 2009 at 4:02 PM

I agree with you whole-heartedly regarding your concerns of the rising rates of C-Sections.  I also think that women should be fully educated before choosing an option.  As a woman who tried for a VBAC and was not able to get one, you should know that they are not always attainable for reasons of safety.  I know of someone who died and whose child died as well because she was so intent on having her VBAC.  It was a rather traumatic experience for her husband and children...to say the least.  Again, I'm not trying to bash you for encouraging women to avoid getting a cesarean because I also think the surgical procedure to performed altogether too often; certainly more often than is necessary.  I just think that the bigger issue is getting women educated regarding their options & the safety of those options given their individual situation.

Message Friend Invite

CTRed...
Oct. 13, 2009 at 4:22 PM

Mary, first I am sorry for the loss of your friend. When you look at the scientific evidence behind repeat cesarean sections when compared to VBAC for health, low risk mothers, and I say healthy low risk women because these are the women that should be going for VBAC, not the women who have Pre-E at 32 weeks or some type of obstetric emergency. I am not sure what happened to your friend, but there are lots of things more likely to kill a woman than having a VBAC, and one of those things just happens to be a elective repeat cesarean with no medical reason.

As for the risk of uterine rupture, most women are never told by their provider that after having one cesarean section, they are always at a risk of uterine rupture with any subsequent pregnancy, and that is one of the biggest misconceptions about VBAC. Most women think or are told that they have a risk of uterine rupture of they attempt a VBAC, well truth be told, they have the same risk during an elective repeat cesarean, and any time during their pregnancies after any cesarean section.

The problem is women are going to their providers, and they are only getting 30% of the information regarding VBAC vs. elective repeat cesarean. They are not being told that there is a three times higher chance of neo natal death, they are not being told that with each cesarean their risk for uterine rupture during pregnancy increases, they are not being told that they will be at risk for increased infertlity or increased risk for an ectopic pregnancy. If all the real risks, and I mean ALL from A to Z were being really laid out on the table, women wouldn't be choosing them. I can put money on that.

When I was pregnant with my second child, and had to sign the "VBAC Consent" form from my midwives office, which was writen by the lawyer of the OB/GYN group that backed them, the list of VBAC risks was 3 paragraphs. The risk listed for a repeat elective cesarean barely made one paragraph. Being an educated consumer, I laughed hysterically at the form, as did my Midwife for the thousandth time because she knew as well as I did that the form was simply picking and choosing what it wanted to include.

Point is women need to educate themselves, and the problem is they aren't. They are blinding following what their doctors are telling them because in America there is this stigma that Doctors are some kind of magical beings that know all. They are human, they make mistakes, and they deceive in a lot of cases. And these women are being put through the system. Which is why this has become an important battle for me.

Message Friend Invite (Original Poster)

Bella...
Oct. 14, 2009 at 4:20 PM

i have had to c-sections, but seriously if i was to get pregnant again I would want a vbac. the only reason i couldnt with my second is because they were only 11 months apart and my docs said that my body hasnt completely healed. my now my second child is 2 and i bet it would work.

Message Friend Invite

trkrwyf
Oct. 14, 2009 at 10:10 PM

i agree with you i have been lucky to have 3 csect and vbac

but the only reason i was allow was the time in between

1989 c-section (baby wasnt in canal and water broke and contractions were weak..)

1990 c-section (was in labor for 3 days with nothing happening)

2000 vbac

2002 c-section (emergency his heart rate dropped and my blood pressure dropped) he was going to be a vaginal too till this had happened.

Message Friend Invite

campm...
Oct. 14, 2009 at 11:21 PM

I realize that this a very controversial issue regarding women and VBAC.  I have three children and I have had 2 c-sections (my oldest and youngest children were c-sections)  I delivered my daughter in 2002 via VBAC after 7 intense hours of horrific pushing.  I was so torn both internally and externally that I had to undergo emergency surgery to repair the severe tearing on my cervix and rectum.  The unstoppable bleeding almost cost me my life.  There is always a compelling reason behind why a woman has a c-section.  In my case, it was because my first born was posterior and after quickly dilating to 10 cm, i was not able to push her out.  After 10 long hours, my OB decided it was time for me to be sectioned.  There was a reason why I couldn't give birth vaginally to my first daughter, so I should have never, ever been allowed to even attempt a VBAC.  I am so thankful for my healthy, beautiful children, but i will never forget that terrible VBAC experience.  Women need to educate themselves on their own bodies and understand the risk factors that come along with a VBAC.  The decision to have a VBAC needs to be based solely on the woman's body as well as the reasons why she couldn't deliver vaginally the first time around.

Message Friend Invite

kelli...
Oct. 15, 2009 at 2:18 AM

I have had 4 children. The first 3 were vaginal births and the 4th was c-sec. .  I was devastated! I know I should be thankfull my baby is healthy.  I HATE that I had to have the c-sec.  I feel as if I didn't give birth, that the birth of my baby was taken from me.  I probably wouldn't feel this way if my first 3 weren't vaginal, but I do.  I feel like no one understands how painful it was emotionally, and how hard it is to get over it.  Is anyone else feeling this way?

Message Friend Invite

tyrel...
Oct. 15, 2009 at 2:44 AM

Kelliebean, you probably would have felt the same way, even if you hadn't experienced vaginal birth before.  My first two were c-section.  I STILL don't feel like I gave birth to them, and they're 4 and 2.  It has been very painful and traumatic for me.  The only thing that has helped was my successful VBAC this August.  My confirmation that yes, my body does work the way it's supposed to.   What definitely doesn't help is that no one I know IRL understands at all.  At least we understand each other, right?

Message Friend Invite

CTRed...
Oct. 15, 2009 at 8:42 AM

Camp, not in all cases there is a real valid reason for a woman to have a c-section. With my first, there was no real compelling reason other than my OB/GYN wanted to go home. Simple as that. No fetal distress, no issues. I simply was not progressing fast enough for her liking. That was it. As far as women who are having elective repeat cesareans, in the eyes of most, having a c-section with your first child, is simply not a valid reason to have a second cesarean without other real medical reasons.

I understand your VBAC was not the norm. Did they leave you on your back? Did they allow you to get up to push, stand up, get on your hands and knees, use a birth stool?

Message Friend Invite (Original Poster)

CTRed...
Oct. 15, 2009 at 8:43 AM

Kellie, many women who have c-sections feel like that, even if they have not had a vaginal birth before their cesarean. Maybe you should look up your local ICAN chapter?

Message Friend Invite (Original Poster)

Want to leave a comment and join the discussion?

Sign up for CafeMom!

Already a member? Click here to log in

Advertisement