I love researching a wide variety of subjects for hobby, and have from a young age. 

Middle school is when I started researching, and I started when I decided to research more into the death of Kurt Cobain;  From that I came to the conclusion that he did not commit suicide, but was murdered.  I know it was listed as suicide as his cause of death, but from researching I don't think that was what happened at all.  Kurt Cobain's supposed "suicide note" doesn't say anything about suicide in the body of the letter and is believed to have been a goodbye letter written for the fans, as Nirvana had been coming to an end.  The last 4 lines in the note were PROVEN to have been written in someone else's handwriting through handwriting analysis.  The note, pen used to write it, and shotgun used to Kill Kurt Cobain were all completely free of fingerprints, as if they had been cleaned.  Why would someone committing suicide clean all those things?  If he had done it himself he would have clearly left at least one fingerprint somewhere on the gun, or pen.  Also, during the autopsy it was found Kurt Cobain had 3 times the lethal dose of heroin in his system which would have put him in a coma or killed him instantly, although there is some speculation that due to his excessive drug use, he may have been able to handle that amount.  A man came forward to say that Courtney Love had offered him $50,000 to kill her husband, but the man had thought she was joking.  I also heard an audio recording taken soon after Cobain's death of Courtney Love joking that his death had boosted her album sales.  At the time Cobain died, he and Love had been considering divorce and Cobain planned on getting custody of their baby Francis Bean, Courtney Love wasn't going to let that happen.  And why hadn't Courtney Love told the police about the hidden room above the garage when Cobain was missing, which is where he was finally found after about 5 days dead.

I have done tons of research on Vaccines and believe they are much more harmful to your body then most know about.  To be honest I am getting a little tired of spreading awareness on the subject with no one listening.  I know how well my research is done and I know how credible my information is.  I think mom's who choose not to research vaccines for their kids at all don't honestly care about their child's BEST well-being.  Most people take the media's word for it which is the wrong way to go.  In my own personal opinion, a mother who does the research and chooses not to vaccinate their children is an amazingly smart mother.  And I'm not talking about talking to one person about it and reading an article or two, I'm talking about actually un-bias extensive research on both sides.

Through just SOME of my research on vaccines I've found that all major measles outbreaks in the U.S. since the measles vaccine was introduced had all been caused by large populationsof people who had been previously vaccinated against the measles.  So....  Why are people still vaccinating themselves against the measles when it's clearly been proven that it does not guard you against catching the measles.  I mean 8 years before the measles vaccine was even introduced, measles deaths had decreased on it's own 97.7 percent, yet the media still tries to convince people the rates had declined due to the vaccines itself.  Untrue.  What about polio, polio cases themselves skyrocketed AFTER the diphtheria and Pertussis vaccines were introduced.  And same thing with the measles, the Polio death rate had also declines on it's own before the Polio vaccine was introduced.  And no I have not made up these statistics, they are actual.  And the Gardasil vaccine that is suppose to prevent Cancer caused by HPV is TERRIBLE.  There have been many known immediate deaths following the gardasil vaccine injection within seconds, and others who became so very Ill after the shots.  Now I dunno about you, but I would much rather risk getting cervical cancer and fighting against it then to risk being killed instantly from that vaccine.

I do consider vaccines to be my some-what "amature expertise," but I do love to research a large variety of things such as; the TRUTH behind 9-11,The Loch Ness monster, the lost city of Atlantis, the Bermuda Triangle, Napoleon Bonaparte (who i believe was a mix of an almost-genius, and a complete douche-bag), Ruby Ridge, Waco Texas.  I've even used my awsome research skills to find an old childhood friend of my mother-in-law's that she hadn't seen in over 25 years, which was a some-what complicated process.  And I love researching family history and have traced a lot of my family from my mother's side back to the 1200's so far, and I've only just started researching my husband's side of the family, but I need to confirm a couple details before continuing that.

Currently I'm still searching in piecing together the history of all life.  I believe in God and that he created everything, but there are a lot of things missing from the bible that I believe could still make sense with most science.  Like what happened in between Adam and Eve and the great flood?  It says in the Bible the great flood was done to kill out all with wicked int he world, so how wicked did mankind get before Noah's ark?  The bible doesn't say anything about anyone from between Adam and Eve and the great flood or how much time passed between them.  I believe hundreds of thousands of years may have passed in that time.  During that time, is that when the world broke apart into all the separate countries?  Since there is scientific evidence that some parts of the word fit together like a puzzle and their coasts have all the same properties so I do believe there once was a time when all the land on earth was connected into one great big chunk of land.  I also believe that the science that claims the world was around for billions of years before humans roamed the earth could be possible.  The bible says that everything on earth was created in 7 days, but according to science, the earth was around long before humans.  Doesn't the bible also say that a moment in heaven could be years or longer on earth.  So isn't it possible that one heaven day is equivalent to say, 10 billion years on earth?  So maybe God created earth in 7 heaven days, but in 70 billion years on earth. (Of course if this is true, I don't know how many earth days is equivalent to one heaven day, I am using 10 billion years to one heaven day as an example)  So if earth was made on the 1st day, and people on the 6th day, it may have well been that earth was created in 10 billion earth years and one heaven day, and then people came 60 billions earth years later, but only 6 heaven days later.  I'm still confused in this subject, there's still a lot I don't know and I lot more I want to understand.

There's still plenty of other things I have researched, am researching, and things I will research, all because I love the hobby and learning about interesting things.

Comments have been turned off for this post.