Taunton second-grader suspended over drawing of Jesus

Father angered by forced psychological evaluation of boy, 8


Loading multimedia...


Submitted photo
A Maxham Elementary student was suspended from school for drawing what he says depicts Jesus on the cross. His name was removed from the drawing based on the family's wish to protect the boy.
advertisement
By Gerry Tuoti, Staff Writer
GateHouse News Service
Posted Dec 14, 2009 @ 10:20 PM

Taunton -


A Taunton father is outraged after his 8-year-old son was sent home from school and required to undergo a psychological evaluation after drawing a stick-figure picture of Jesus Christ on the cross.


The father said he got a call earlier this month from Maxham Elementary School informing him that his son, a second-grade student, had created a violent drawing. The image in question depicted a crucified Jesus with Xs covering his eyes to signify that he had died on the cross. The boy wrote his name above the cross.


"As far as I'm concerned, they're violating his religion," the incredulous father said.

He requested that his name and his son's name be withheld from publication to protect the boy.


The student drew the picture shortly after taking a family trip to see the Christmas display at the National Shrine of Our Lady of La Salette, a Christian retreat site in Attleboro. He made the drawing in class after his teacher asked the children to sketch something that reminded them of Christmas, the father said.


"I think what happened is that because he put Xs in the eyes of Jesus, the teacher was alarmed and they told the parents they thought it was violent," said Toni Saunders, an educational consultant with the Associated Advocacy Center.


Saunders is working with the boy's parents after a mutual acquaintance referred them to her.


"When I got that call, I was so appalled that I had to do something," Saunders said.

"They weren't looking at the fact that this is an 8-year-old child with special needs," she added. "They made him leave school, and they recommended that a psychiatrist do an evaluation."


The school, in fact, required the evaluation before the boy could return, the father said.

Maxham School principal Rebecca Couet referred all questions on the matter to the superintendent's office.


Superintendent Julie Hackett said district policy prevents her from discussing a "confidential matter regarding a student."


"Generally speaking, we have safety protocols in place," Hackett said. "If a situation warrants it, we ask for outside safety evaluations if we have particular concerns about a child's safety. We followed all the protocols in our system."


Hackett refused to specifically discuss the student's drawing or the school's reaction to it.

The father was flabbergasted when he learned his son had to undergo an evaluation.

"When she told me he needed to be psychologically evaluated, I thought she was playing," he said.


The man said his son, who gets specialized reading and speech instruction at school, has never shown any tendency toward violence.


"He's never been suspended," he said. "He's 8 years old. They overreacted."


The boy made the drawing and was sent home from school on Dec. 2. He went for the psychological evaluation - at his parents' expense - the next day and was cleared to return to school the following Monday after the psychological evaluation found nothing to indicate that he posed a threat to himself or others.


The boy, however, was traumatized by the incident, which made going back to school very difficult, the father said. School administrators have approved the father's request to have the boy transferred to another elementary school in the district.


This is not the first time in recent years that a Taunton student has been sent home over a drawing. In June 2008, fifth-grade student Cullen Smithson was suspended from Mulcahey Middle School for a day after creating a stick figure drawing that appeared to depict him shooting his teacher and a classmate.


The Mulcahey teacher also contacted the police to take out charges in the 2008 incident.


gtuoti@tauntongazette.com


Ok now I don't want this to be a religious debate over who is right or who is wrong etc....or have people start bashing Christians. They asked the boy to draw something about Christmas and he drew Jesus so I really don't see the problem here and think their reaction was insane.

If you are Christian which the boy obviously is Jesus is the reason for Christmas and his sacrifice on the cross shows his love for us. So the school's reaction was trying to suppress his religion.



Update


School, Parents At Odds Over Claim Boy Was Suspended For Drawing Jesus

By Mark Memmott

Two very different accounts are being told by those involved in a story that's gotten national attention because the first reports said a second-grader had been suspended from school for drawing a picture of Jesus on a cross.

The boy's father says his son was sent home and required to see a psychiatrist.

School officials in Taunton, Mass., say the local newspaper -- which first reported the news -- and other outlets got the story all wrong.

The Boston Globe writes this morning that:

"The report is totally inaccurate,'' Julie Hackett, superintendent of the Taunton public schools, said in an interview in her office yesterday. "The inaccuracies in the original media story have resulted in a great deal of criticism and scrutiny of the system that is unwarranted.''

The original accounts, as the Associated Press wrote, were that "an 8-year-old Massachusetts boy was sent home from school and ordered to undergo a psychological evaluation after he was asked to make a Christmas drawing and sketched what appeared to be a stick figure of Jesus on a cross, the child's father said Tuesday."

That father, Chester Johnson, spent much of yesterday talking with reporters about what he says happened.

It was last evening when the school superintendent responded, issuing a statement saying that the boy had not been suspended, that the drawing that prompted some concern was not the one of Jesus on a cross (she did not describe the other image) and that students had not been asked to make sketches about Christmas "or any religious holiday."

We expect more will be said about this in coming days.





I'm really not sure i believe the school. If they are positive it's not the Jesus picture he was disciplined over why won't they say what was on the picture. They are just being too vague for me to be convinced they aren't just trying to save face now that the world knows what idiots they are.


Add A Comment

Comments:

flitp...
Dec. 15, 2009 at 8:58 AM

I'm not Christian and I absolutely agree that he school went overboard. He's a child. If Christmas reminds him of his religion (which, as we remember, is why we celebrate Christmas like we do) then so be it. If they're going to bring a religious holiday into a school, they need to be prepared for some children to think of Jesus before Santa.  

Message Friend Invite

ankle...
Dec. 15, 2009 at 3:15 PM

I am not christian either and I agree the school went overboard.  Goodness what are they going to start doing, making all the churches take down their crucifixs (spelling) because they are 'violent'. 

Message Friend Invite

Krist...
Dec. 15, 2009 at 3:19 PM

While Yes the picture can be seen as violent I do feel that the school board over reacted.  Once the explanation came out that it was "Jesus on the Cross" the matter should have been dropped.

Message Friend Invite

ankle...
Dec. 15, 2009 at 3:22 PM

Ok after I read the whole article the end part sad this has happened before.   But the first time if was a depiction of killing with guns.  I think this is less to do with religion and more to do  with people over reacting about a "violent" picture.

Message Friend Invite

ankle...
Dec. 15, 2009 at 3:23 PM

I agree Kristi.

Message Friend Invite

Colts...
Dec. 15, 2009 at 4:22 PM

way overboard!!!!!!! what if he wore a crufix as a lot of people do?? ugh.

Message Friend Invite

Saya
Dec. 15, 2009 at 4:54 PM

The kid put his OWN name on the cross, not Jesus.  I think the teacher was concerned about the child.  She probably could have called the parents instead of sending the child home.  But what if the 8 year old really had an issue and ended up hurting himself or someone else?  Then everyone would say "why didn't they do anything, they should have seen this coming, Look at those X's on the eyes!"  So I think that in today's world you just can win.

 

Message Friend Invite

Rebec...
Dec. 15, 2009 at 5:12 PM

Yeah that was overboard.  Sent home was just silly.

Message Friend Invite

Colts...
Dec. 15, 2009 at 5:13 PM

the thing is.. the cross WAS violent. the cruxifiction was violent. .does that mean people shouldn't wear crucfix or crosses cause of it? i mean . ..i just dont get it to be honest, looking at the picture

Message Friend Invite

ethan...
Dec. 15, 2009 at 6:48 PM

I like how they ( the school) compared the picture of the cruxifiction (and they did ask for things that reminded them of the holiday) to a picture of a boy shooting a teacher. Nice. Obviously those two drawing are on the same page....

The school way overeacted, but it's really no surprise to me since my mom was called in for a parent teacher confrerence when I was five because I had blurted out that dog was god spelled backwards.

Message Friend Invite

Want to leave a comment and join the discussion?

Sign up for CafeMom!

Already a member? Click here to log in