Is it wrong to talk about the public health importance of breastfeeding?
So there was this article
in Pediatrics that estimated there are 911 preventable deaths a
year in the U.S. due to lack of breastfeeding.
Should we not say
that? The comments sections of a lot of the media coverage of this
article, and several bloggers, think so. Apparently, saying that lack of
breastfeeding has real public health consequences is making women feel
bad. Because there are a hundred ways in which women in this country get
poor support and/or have their breastfeeding attempts outright
sabotaged, a lot of women don't manage to breastfeed successfully. So we
should stop saying that breastfeeding has important public health
effects, because then some women will feel guilty that breastfeeding
didn't work out for them. Do you follow? I don't. I really, really
don't.
I see an implication in those comments that no one is
grappling with the structural issues that affect breastfeeding success,
that breastfeeding advocates are not interested in those issues. I beg
to differ. At the Breastfeeding & Feminism conference (which was
awesome, and I only wish I had the time and brainpower right now to talk
about the many facets of awesomeness) you could meet dozens and dozens
of people who grapple with these issues in a vital part of their
academic, professional, and/or personal capacity. If you feel like all
breastfeeding advocates are doing is trying to guilt or shame women into
breastfeeding, you aren't looking very hard at breastfeeding advocacy
in this country.*
Just at my university and the associated
hospital, I can think of the following breastfeeding advocacy projects
happening right now: improving child care centers'
breastfeeding-friendliness, working for the hospital to go
Baby-Friendly, getting funding for free pumps for NICU moms, providing
breastfeeding support training for physicians and medical residents,
improving lactation room information and access on campus, encouraging
businesses to identify as breastfeeding-friendly, training lactation
consultants, teaching prenatal breastfeeding classes, referring to local
WIC peer counselors, providing discounted pumps to university students
& employees, offering a local breastfeeding support group for
African-American moms, and studying the impact of each Baby-Friendly
step on hospital breastfeeding rates.
With all of that work to
facilitate people reaching their breastfeeding goals on a structural and
community level, you can understand why I'm so frustrated when articles
like the one in Pediatrics get the reception they do. Which of those
activities is targeted at making women feel guilty? Which is just about
trying to control women's bodies and tell them what to do?
In
fact, let's take a look at the conclusions section of the article itself
which reads, in its entirety:
"By being incredibly selfish and
not trying hard enough, 911 American mothers kill their babies every
year by not breastfeeding. Clearly, public health and medical
authorities have failed to make women feel guilty enough for not
breastfeeding. Further efforts are required to make all mothers feel
shame for any amount of formula that they offer their babies, regardless
of their individual circumstances."
Oh, whoops! That wasn't the
actual conclusions section. I got confused there for a moment. Here's
the real one:
"By allowing breastfeeding rates to continue at
their current levels, rather than implementing supports to help more
families follow medically recommended guidelines, the United States
incurs billions of dollars in excess costs and hundreds of preventable
infant deaths. Action to improve breastfeeding rates, duration, and
exclusivity, including creation of a national infrastructure to support
breastfeeding, could be cost-effective."
I don't see a single
mention in there even of education targeted at consumers. I don't even
see individuals mentioned. I hear talk about "implementing supports" and
"creation of a national infrastructure". I see an admonishment to our
country to facilitate breastfeeding success. When people talk about
"articles like this making women feel guilty because a lot of women
can't breastfeed" and "don't they know that breastfeeding is hard", my
jaw just drops. The whole point of articles like this is to point
out that we need to do better at making breastfeeding less hard,
at enabling more women to overcome breastfeeding difficulties, to
illustrate to policymakers and public health authorities that those
efforts are worth it for very concrete human and financial reasons. To
make them feel guilty for the piss-poor job we do of supporting
breastfeeding specifically, and mothers in general. If we don't talk
about the reasons breastfeeding is important, how can we advocate for
system change?
There are hundreds if not thousands of public
health professionals out there trying to make the system changes that
people responding to these articles often point out. How can we support
breastfeeding if we're not supposed to say WHY?
*Let's note that "looking hard" does not mean
"reading blogs and comment sections". Can I bait a flame-war about
breast vs. formula with people getting obnoxiously self-righteous on
both sides? Yes; I can also start one about Pepsi vs. Coke, but that
doesn't mean Pepsi is actually putting out ads calling Coke drinkers
elitist jerk-offs.
Again, not written by me.
Comments:
People don't want to think that the choice they made was not the best one. Others feel bad because they legitimately could not. Either way, it is easier on their conscience to defend their choice- rather than helping the other women out there sharing the same frustrations and concerns that pushed them away.
Of course we should be talking about it. People chose to feel guilty and defend their choices rather than just say "crap I didnt know! let me learn more so I can do better next time." No they say "How DARE you insinuate that i didnt make the absolute best choice!"
*sigh* We're not even trying to make them feel guilty, we just want to get the message out about this VERY IMPORTANT HEALTH ISSUE.
This whole argument requires people to be able to think in the abstract, and not about themselves. Personal anecdote means nothing when dealing with statistics. I was lucky---I gave birth in a certified Baby-Friendly hospital and my employer is extremely pro-breastfeeding, providing not only lactation rooms but hospital grade pumps, a lactation consultant on staff, and a breastfeeding support group moderated by an IBCLC. That's my personal anecdote. What does it have to do with this story? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. That's the value of personal anecdotes when discussing public health issues.
The article does not say that women who chose to formula feed contributed to the deaths of those 911 children. I think that the only response that it asks for from all women is to say that we can do better than that, and we've got the resources as a nation to provide the proper infrastructure so that no woman has to go through the heartbreak of losing her infant.
Why do people think wic counselors are pro breastfeeding? Well not where I live they are formula pushers.
They're supposed to be, Crystal. Especially with the changes in October to encourage them to be even more pro-breastfeeding after statistics showed that with the old method, people were LESS likely to breastfeed if they knew they could get formula from WIC.
Thank you thank you THANK YOU for posting this. This is what I and so many others have been trying to get at for the longest time.
It's time we fix the boken system.
It's not wrong. It's just a subject people get extremely defensive about, though.
I completely agree. I commented on your post earlier this week with my thoughts.
I am pro-breastfeeding. But I am not on any CM groups about it anymore, as my questions were not taken seriously and many replies were catty & mean (The group may have changed in 2+yrs). Even on this site, women who wish to learn more about breastfeeding and try to make it work are treated very harshly, leading to an environment of failure.
And for those who discount the posts saying "I tried to, but I couldn't." If you truly want to change the system, instead of just dismissing their posts, read WHY they failed. And that will target where we all need to focus our efforts.
Already a member? Click here to log in


The Best 100 Baby Names on the Map
Yes absolutely we should be talking about it, the same we are addressing obesity in this country.
You are doing a wonderful service to the cafemom community by spreading the word. Thank you!
- science_spot
Message Friend Invite